IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v13y2024i2p21-d1330810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Bioenergetic Potential from Coffee Processing Residues: Towards an Industrial Symbiosis

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Torres Albarracin

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Mendeleyev 200, Campinas 13083-860, SP, Brazil
    Center for Energy Planning (NIPE), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Cora Coralina 330, Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)

  • Irina Ramirez Mas

    (Laboratory of Anaerobic Biotechnology, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Rodovia José Aurélio Vilela 11999, Poços de Caldas 37704-376, MG, Brazil)

  • Lucas Tadeu Fuess

    (Biological Processes Laboratory (LPB), São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC), University of São Paulo (USP), Av. João Dagnone 1100, Santa Angelina, São Carlos 13563-120, SP, Brazil)

  • Renata Piacentini Rodriguez

    (Laboratory of Anaerobic Biotechnology, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Rodovia José Aurélio Vilela 11999, Poços de Caldas 37704-376, MG, Brazil)

  • Maria Paula Cardeal Volpi

    (Center for Energy Planning (NIPE), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Cora Coralina 330, Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil
    School of Agricultural Engineering (FEAGRI), University of Campinas (Unicamp), Av. Cândido Rondon 501—Cidade Universitária, Campinas 13083-875, SP, Brazil)

  • Bruna de Souza Moraes

    (Center for Energy Planning (NIPE), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Cora Coralina 330, Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Coffee processing generates a large amount of organic waste, which has the potential for energy use through biogas production. Although Brazil dominates world coffee production, treating its residue with biogas technology is not a practice, especially due to this product’s seasonality, which hampers continuous digester operation. The implementation of biogas production from coffee residues in a concept of industrial symbiosis could overcome this. This work evaluates the biogas energy potential from the main liquid residues of coffee processing (i.e., mucilage and wash water) and their integration with glycerin and cattle manure. Around 2773 m 3 biogas day −1 would be produced (75% CH 4 ), used as biomethane (734 thousand m 3 year −1 ), or thermal energy (23,000,000 MJ year −1 ), or electricity (2718 MWh year −1 ), which could supply, respectively, all the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and diesel demands of the farm, all the thermal energy demands of the grain drying process, as well as electricity for 30 residences. Considering the short coffee season, the results have a broader context for the application of biogas production on coffee processing farms, envisaging that the Agroindustrial Eco-Park concept has the potential to integrate various agroindustrial sectors for energy production, residue exchange, and water recirculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Torres Albarracin & Irina Ramirez Mas & Lucas Tadeu Fuess & Renata Piacentini Rodriguez & Maria Paula Cardeal Volpi & Bruna de Souza Moraes, 2024. "The Bioenergetic Potential from Coffee Processing Residues: Towards an Industrial Symbiosis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:21-:d:1330810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minjeong Lee & Minseok Yang & Sangki Choi & Jingyeong Shin & Chanhyuk Park & Si-Kyung Cho & Young Mo Kim, 2019. "Sequential Production of Lignin, Fatty Acid Methyl Esters and Biogas from Spent Coffee Grounds via an Integrated Physicochemical and Biological Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    3. Marian Chertow & Weslynne Ashton & Juan Espinosa, 2008. "Industrial Symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally Related Agglomeration Economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1299-1312.
    4. Sandra Gonzalez-Piedra & Héctor Hernández-García & Juan M. Perez-Morales & Laura Acosta-Domínguez & Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel & Eliseo Hernandez-Martinez, 2021. "A Study on the Feasibility of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Raw Cheese Whey with Coffee Pulp Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Chapagain, A.K. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2007. "The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 109-118, October.
    6. Moraes, Bruna S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cavalett, Otávio & Mantelatto, Paulo E. & Bonomi, Antonio & Zaiat, Marcelo, 2014. "Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 825-835.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacio Cazcarro & Rosa Duarte & Miguel Martín-Retortillo & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2015. "How Sustainable is the Increase in the Water Footprint of the Spanish Agricultural Sector? A Provincial Analysis between 1955 and 2005–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Ehsan Qasemipour & Ali Abbasi & Farhad Tarahomi, 2020. "Water-Saving Scenarios Based on Input–Output Analysis and Virtual Water Concept: A Case in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Bain, Ariana & Shenoy, Megha & Ashton, Weslynne & Chertow, Marian, 2010. "Industrial symbiosis and waste recovery in an Indian industrial area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1278-1287.
    4. Zhilong Wei & Lei Wang & Hu Liu & Zihao Liu & Haisheng Zhen, 2021. "Numerical Investigation on the Flame Structure and CO/NO Formations of the Laminar Premixed Biogas–Hydrogen Impinging Flame in the Wall Vicinity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Gao, Yuchen & Jiang, Jianguo & Meng, Yuan & Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu & Ju, Tongyao & Chen, Xuejing & Yan, Feng, 2020. "A novel nickel catalyst supported on activated coal fly ash for syngas production via biogas dry reforming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-793.
    6. Korberg, Andrei David & Skov, Iva Ridjan & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2020. "The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Raquel de Souza Deuber & Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Daniel Santos Fernandes & Henrique Real Guimarães & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Antonio Bonomi & Leonardo Vasconcelos Fregolente & Marcos Djun Barbosa , 2023. "Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels from Lignocellulosic Residues in Brazil through Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Błażej Gaze & Paulina Wojtko & Bernard Knutel & Przemysław Kobel & Kinga Bobrowicz & Przemysław Bukowski & Jerzy Chojnacki & Jan Kielar, 2023. "Influence of Catalytic Additive Application on the Wood-Based Waste Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Wiedmann, Thomas, 2009. "A first empirical comparison of energy Footprints embodied in trade -- MRIO versus PLUM," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1975-1990, May.
    10. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Zhang, Zhien & Reina, T.R., 2020. "Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias, 2019. "Current Status, Emerging Challenges, and Future Prospects of Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.
    14. Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    15. Okadera, Tomohiro & Geng, Yong & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Dong, Huijuan & Liu, Zhu & Yoshida, Noboru & Kanazawa, Takaaki, 2015. "Evaluating the water footprint of the energy supply of Liaoning Province, China: A regional input–output analysis approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 148-157.
    16. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Tiberio Daddi & Domenico Ceglia & Guia Bianchi & Marcia Dutra de Barcellos, 2019. "Paradoxical tensions and corporate sustainability: A focus on circular economy business cases," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 770-780, July.
    18. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    20. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "The Impact of Manure Use for Energy Purposes on the Economic Balance of a Dairy Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:21-:d:1330810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.