IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v13y2024i11p151-d1505895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability and Environmental Performance in Selective Collection of Residual Materials: Impact of Modulating Citizen Participation Through Policy and Incentive Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Laurie Fontaine

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

  • Robert Legros

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

  • Jean-Marc Frayret

    (Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

Abstract

The effective management of urban waste represents a growing challenge in the face of demographic evolution and increased consumption. This study explores the impacts of municipal strategic decisions on household waste management behaviours and sustainability performance outcomes through agent-based modelling. Using data from Gatineau and Beaconsfield in Quebec, Canada, the model is calibrated and validated to represent diverse urban contexts. Our analysis demonstrates that reducing collection frequency leads to notable increases in participation rates, reaching 78.2 ± 5.1% for collections every two weeks and 96.5 ± 8.3% for collections every five weeks. While this reduction improves bin filling levels, it concurrently decreases the recovery of recyclable materials by 2.8% and 19.5%, significantly undermining the environmental benefits of the recycling program. These findings highlight a complex interplay between collection frequency, citizen participation behaviour, waste stream characteristics, and overall environmental performance. While reducing collection frequency initially appears beneficial, it leads to operational challenges and increased CO 2 emissions due to reduced material recovery. The research emphasises the need for tailored holistic waste management strategies that optimise performance outcomes while minimising environmental impacts. By understanding these dynamics, municipalities can develop more effective waste management policies that promote sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurie Fontaine & Robert Legros & Jean-Marc Frayret, 2024. "Sustainability and Environmental Performance in Selective Collection of Residual Materials: Impact of Modulating Citizen Participation Through Policy and Incentive Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:151-:d:1505895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/11/151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/11/151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida Ferrara & Paul Missios, 2005. "Recycling and Waste Diversion Effectiveness: Evidence from Canada," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(2), pages 221-238, February.
    2. Karavezyris, Vassilios & Timpe, Klaus-Peter & Marzi, Ruth, 2002. "Application of system dynamics and fuzzy logic to forecasting of municipal solid waste," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 149-158.
    3. Hancong Ma & Mei Li & Xin Tong & Ping Dong, 2023. "Community-Level Household Waste Disposal Behavior Simulation and Visualization under Multiple Incentive Policies—An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Hailin Wu & Fengming Tao & Bo Yang, 2020. "Optimization of Vehicle Routing for Waste Collection and Transportation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. He, Zhou & Xiong, Jie & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Fan, Bo & Shoemaker, Christine A., 2017. "Managing competitive municipal solid waste treatment systems: An agent-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 1063-1077.
    6. Ju-Chin Huang, & John M. Halstead, & Shanna B. Saunders, 2011. "Managing Municipal Solid Waste with Unit-Based Pricing: Policy Effects and Responsiveness to Pricing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(4), pages 645-660.
    7. Shi, Xiaoran & Thanos, Aristotelis E. & Celik, Nurcin, 2014. "Multi-objective agent-based modeling of single-stream recycling programs," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 190-205.
    8. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    9. Peter Tucker & Andrew Smith, 1999. "Simulating Household Waste Management Behaviours," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2(3), pages 1-3.
    10. Zhikun Ding & Wenyan Gong & Shenghan Li & Zezhou Wu, 2018. "System Dynamics versus Agent-Based Modeling: A Review of Complexity Simulation in Construction Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rizzati, Massimiliano & Landoni, Matteo, 2024. "A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 617-631.
    2. Valaei Sharif, Shahab & Habibi Moshfegh, Peyman & Kashani, Hamed, 2023. "Simulation modeling of operation and coordination of agencies involved in post-disaster response and recovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Elbert Dijkgraaf & Raymond Gradus, 2017. "An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(3), pages 501-526, November.
    4. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.
    6. Sellevåg, Stig Rune, 2021. "Changes in inoperability for interdependent industry sectors in Norway from 2012 to 2017," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    7. Maarten A. Allers & Corine Hoeben, 2010. "Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing: A Differences-in-Differences Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 405-428, March.
    8. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Mazur, Christoph & Hoegerle, Yannick & Brucoli, Maria & van Dam, Koen & Guo, Miao & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "A holistic resilience framework development for rural power systems in emerging economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 219-232.
    10. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2021. "Feasibility study of PRA for critical infrastructure risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Aktar, Asikha & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Harun, Mukaramah, 2022. "Energy Efficiency Policies in Malaysia: A Critical Evaluation from the Sustainable Development Perspective," OSF Preprints 9cf3a, Center for Open Science.
    13. Shihab Uddin & Qing Lu & Hung Nguyen, 2021. "Truck Impact on Buried Water Pipes in Interdependent Water and Road Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Hausken, Kjell, 2024. "Fifty Years of Operations Research in Defense," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 355-368.
    15. Moglen, Rachel L. & Barth, Julius & Gupta, Shagun & Kawai, Eiji & Klise, Katherine & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2023. "A nexus approach to infrastructure resilience planning under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    17. Mohamad Darayi & Kash Barker & Joost R. Santos, 2017. "Component Importance Measures for Multi-Industry Vulnerability of a Freight Transportation Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1111-1136, December.
    18. Dylan Sanderson & Sabarethinam Kameshwar & Nathanael Rosenheim & Daniel Cox, 2021. "Deaggregation of multi-hazard damages, losses, risks, and connectivity: an application to the joint seismic-tsunami hazard at Seaside, Oregon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1821-1847, November.
    19. Jiang, P. & Liu, X., 2016. "Hidden Markov model for municipal waste generation forecasting under uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 639-651.
    20. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:151-:d:1505895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.