IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i6p64-d1155897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Tsiglianu

    (Economics, Organization and Management Department, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Natalia Romasheva

    (Economics, Organization and Management Department, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Artem Nenko

    (Gazpromneft-Technological Partnerships LLC, 190000 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

More than half of the global demand for energy resources is covered today by oil and natural gas, and according to various forecasts, it is expected to grow 1.5–2 times greater over the next 30–50 years. This creates serious prospects for the development of the national oil and gas sectors of various countries, including Russia. Modern industry challenges create significant restrictions for the development of Russian oil and gas resources, and considering their predominant technological nature, the key solution is the increase in internal technological potential, in particular through the implementation of engineering projects aimed at creating the necessary technological solutions. This article presents an approach to the development of a conceptual management framework that will allow for the effective implementation of oil and gas engineering projects. The methodology of the research includes desk studies, systematization, the expert method (including interviews and questionnaires), grouping, generalization, and algorithm design techniques. The results of the study showed that effective implementation of engineering projects should be based on a systematic management approach, one of which is the TRA process. This article analyzes the TRA methods, on the basis of which key project readiness indicators are identified. Based on a literature review and the expert method, the relevant readiness indicators necessary for the assessment of oil and gas engineering projects are substantiated. Given these indicators, the authors proposed a framework for a comprehensive readiness assessment of oil and gas engineering projects and developed an algorithm for management decision-making on project implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Tsiglianu & Natalia Romasheva & Artem Nenko, 2023. "Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:64-:d:1155897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. V. Komarov & A. N.  Petrov  & A. V. Sartory, 2018. "The Model Of Integrated Assessment Of Technological Readiness Of Innovative Scientific And Technological Projects," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 4(1).
    2. Ekaterina Samylovskaya & Alexey Makhovikov & Alexander Lutonin & Dmitry Medvedev & Regina-Elizaveta Kudryavtseva, 2022. "Digital Technologies in Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Extraction: Global Trends and Russian Experience," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, March.
    3. V. V. Jebel’  & A. V. Komarov & K. A. Komarov & K. V. Shurtakov, 2018. "Software For Integrated Assessment Of Technological Readiness Of Innovative Scientific And Technological Projects," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 4(1).
    4. Ruslan Gizatullin & Mikhail Dvoynikov & Natalya Romanova & Victor Nikitin, 2023. "Drilling in Gas Hydrates: Managing Gas Appearance Risks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Sartas, Murat & Schut, Marc & Proietti, Claudio & Thiele, Graham & Leeuwis, Cees, 2020. "Scaling Readiness: Science and practice of an approach to enhance impact of research for development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Sune Solberg Hjorth & Alexander Michael Brem, 2016. "How to Assess Market Readiness for an Innovative Solution: The Case of Heat Recovery Technologies for SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Tatiana Ponomarenko & Eugene Marin & Sergey Galevskiy, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Oil and Gas Projects: Justification of Engineering Solutions in the Implementation of Field Development Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2022. "Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Kobos, Peter H. & Malczynski, Leonard A. & Walker, La Tonya N. & Borns, David J. & Klise, Geoffrey T., 2018. "Timing is everything: A technology transition framework for regulatory and market readiness levels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 211-225.
    10. Irina Gennadyevna Gerasimova & Irina Sergeevna Oblova & Ekaterina Ilinichna Golovina, 2021. "The Demographic Factor Impact on the Economics of the Arctic Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Komarov, A.V. (Комаров, А.В) & Petrov, A.N. (Петров, А.Н.) & Sartory, A.V. (Сартори, А.В.), 2018. "The model of integrated assessment of technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects [Модель Комплексной Оценки Технологической Готовности Инновационных Научно-Технолог," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 47-57, April.
    12. Elena Katysheva, 2023. "Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Jebel', V.V. (Жебель, В.В.) & Komarov, A.V. (Комаров, А.В) & Komarov, K.A. (Комаров, К.А.) & Shurtakov, K.V. (Шуртаков, К.В.), 2018. "Software for integrated assessment of technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects [Программное Средство Для Комплексной Оценки Технологической Готовности Инновационн," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 58-68, April.
    14. Mikhail Dvoynikov & George Buslaev & Andrey Kunshin & Dmitry Sidorov & Andrzej Kraslawski & Margarita Budovskaya, 2021. "New Concepts of Hydrogen Production and Storage in Arctic Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Andrey Kunshin & Mikhail Dvoynikov & Eduard Timashev & Vitaly Starikov, 2022. "Development of Monitoring and Forecasting Technology Energy Efficiency of Well Drilling Using Mechanical Specific Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Sofiya Tesovskaya, 2023. "Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Oksana Marinina & Anna Tsvetkova & Yurii Vasilev & Nadejda Komendantova & Anna Parfenova, 2022. "Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Dmitrieva & Victoria Solovyova, 2023. "Russian Arctic Mineral Resources Sustainable Development in the Context of Energy Transition, ESG Agenda and Geopolitical Tensions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Diana Dmitrieva & Victoria Solovyova, 2024. "A Taxonomy of Mineral Resource Projects in the Arctic: A Path to Sustainable Financing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Andrey Lebedev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn, 2024. "Waste Management during the Production Drilling Stage in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Feasibility Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Marina A. Nevskaya & Semen M. Raikhlin & Victoriya V. Vinogradova & Victor V. Belyaev & Mark M. Khaikin, 2023. "A Study of Factors Affecting National Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Aleksei Kazanin & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2023. "Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Shunli Qin & Juhua Li & Jingyou Chen & Xueli Bi & Hui Xiang, 2023. "Research on Displacement Efficiency by Injecting CO 2 in Shale Reservoirs Based on a Genetic Neural Network Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. V. Komarov & D. A. Matveev & A. V. Filimonov & A. V. Sartory, 2018. "On the development of mechanisms and tools for expanding the value of full-cycle science and technology projects using the TPRL methodology," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 4(4).
    2. Yury Valeryevich Ilyushin & Ekaterina Ivanovna Kapostey, 2023. "Developing a Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Aluminium Production in a Soderberg Electrolyser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Vik, Jostein & Melås, Anders Mahlum & Stræte, Egil Petter & Søraa, Roger Andre, 2021. "Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Komarov, A.V. (Комаров, А.В) & Matveev, D.A. (Матвеев, Д.А.) & Filimonov, A.V. (Филимонов, А.В.) & Sartory, A.V. (Сартори, А.В.), 2018. "The model of integrated assessment of technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects [К Вопросу О Разработке Механизмов И Инструментов Расширения Ценности Научно-Технол," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 282-296, April.
    5. Larisa Vazhenina & Elena Magaril & Igor Mayburov, 2022. "Resource Conservation as the Main Factor in Increasing the Resource Efficiency of Russian Gas Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    7. Ekaterina Golovina & Vera Khloponina & Pavel Tsiglianu & Runchu Zhu, 2023. "Organizational, Economic and Regulatory Aspects of Groundwater Resources Extraction by Individuals (Case of the Russian Federation)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Elena Katysheva, 2023. "Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Oksana Marinina & Anna Nechitailo & Gennady Stroykov & Anna Tsvetkova & Ekaterina Reshneva & Liudmila Turovskaya, 2023. "Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Dimitrios Mendrinos & Spyridon Karytsas & Olympia Polyzou & Constantine Karytsas & Åsta Dyrnes Nordø & Kirsti Midttømme & Danny Otto & Matthias Gross & Marit Sprenkeling & Ruben Peuchen & Tara Geerdin, 2022. "Understanding Societal Requirements of CCS Projects: Application of the Societal Embeddedness Level Assessment Methodology in Four National Case Studies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Torres-Avila, Angelica & Aguilar-Ávila, Jorge & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio & Martínez-González, Enrique Genaro & Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman, 2022. "Innovation in the pineapple value chain in Mexico: Explaining the global adoption process of the MD-2 hybrid," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Brem, Alexander & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2017. "Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects – A case from Denmark," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 130-141.
    14. Darwin Ortiz & Damián Calderón & Alfredo Viloria & Marvin Ricaurte, 2023. "A Techno-Economic Analysis of Natural Gas Valuation in the Amazon Region to Increase the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Production in Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Ang Yang & Xiangyu Meng & He He & Liang Wang & Jing Gao, 2022. "Towards Optimized ARMGs’ Low-Carbon Transition Investment Decision Based on Real Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Brown, Brendan & Paudel, Gokul P. & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2021. "Visualising adoption processes through a stepwise framework: A case study of mechanisation on the Nepal Terai," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Andrey A. Kunshin & George V. Buslaev & Matthias Reich & Dmitriy S. Ulyanov & Dmitriy I. Sidorkin, 2023. "Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Processes in the “Thruster—Downhole Motor—Bit” System While Extended Reach Well Drilling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Alemu, Solomon & Kosmowski, Frederic & Stevenson, James R. & Mallia, Paola & Taye, Lemi & Macours, Karen, 2024. "Studying inclusive innovation with the right data: An empirical illustration from Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Gargani, John & Chaminuka, Petronella & McLean, Robert, 2024. "Dynamic evaluation of agricultural research for development supports innovation and responsible scaling through high-level inclusion," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Juan Abello-Romero & Claudio Mancilla & Walter Sáez & Francisco Ganga-Contreras & Ivette Durán-Seguel, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability of Chilean State Universities: Evidence from Their Strategic Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:64-:d:1155897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.