IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i1p8-d1023739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guidelines for the Technical Sustainability Evaluation of the Urban Drinking Water Systems Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Rukhshanda Rehman

    (National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Planning (NIUIP), The University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar (UET Peshawar), Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
    Department of Civil Engineering, CECOS University of IT & Emerging Sciences, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Sagheer Aslam

    (National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Planning (NIUIP), The University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar (UET Peshawar), Peshawar 25000, Pakistan)

  • Elżbieta Jasińska

    (Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Muhammad Faisal Javed

    (Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Abbottabad Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Miroslava Goňo

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The challenge of achieving and measuring urban water sustainability is hard because of its complex nature. The sustainability of urban drinking water system (UDWS) is no exception, as integration of technical, environmental, social, economic, and institutional elements of sustainability is defying and perplexing in terms of its application and evaluation. This paper deals with the technical aspects related to the design, construction, operation, and maintenance factors of a UDWS. Measurement of the status of such factors is almost impossible in generic formats. Therefore, a list of measurable sub factors was developed through an extensive literature survey and refined by involving appropriate stakeholders. This led to the development of a hierarchy from criteria to factors and from factors to sub factors, making a case for the utilization of an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for multicriteria analysis (MCA). Appropriate stakeholders were included in this research to address the issues for which there were major gaps in the literature. A set of guidelines were developed for the evaluation of the status of various sub factors in a quantitative format. It is concluded that a trans disciplinary framework, the involvement of stakeholders, and guidelines for adopting appropriate processes and techniques may improve the sustainability of stressed urban water systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rukhshanda Rehman & Muhammad Sagheer Aslam & Elżbieta Jasińska & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Miroslava Goňo, 2023. "Guidelines for the Technical Sustainability Evaluation of the Urban Drinking Water Systems Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:8-:d:1023739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/1/8/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/1/8/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nazli Aydin & Larry Mays & Theo Schmitt, 2014. "Sustainability Assessment of Urban Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4373-4384, September.
    2. Xie, M. & Kuffner, U. & Le Moigne, G., 1993. "Using Water Efficiently: Technological Options," Papers 205, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    3. Nazli Aydin & Larry Mays & Theo Schmitt, 2014. "Technical and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(13), pages 4699-4713, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacqueline de Almeida Barbosa Franco & Ary Franco Junior & Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle & Barbara Stolte Bezerra, 2024. "Dynamic Capabilities: Unveiling Key Resources for Environmental Sustainability and Economic Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility towards Sustainable Development Goals," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueping Gao & Lingling Chen & Bowen Sun & Yinzhu Liu, 2017. "Employing SWOT Analysis and Normal Cloud Model for Water Resource Sustainable Utilization Assessment and Strategy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Seungyub Lee & Joong Hoon Kim, 2020. "Quantitative Measure of Sustainability for Water Distribution Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Agathoklis Agathokleous & Chrystalleni Christodoulou & Symeon E. Christodoulou, 2017. "Topological Robustness and Vulnerability Assessment of Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(12), pages 4007-4021, September.
    4. Robert L. Oxley & Larry W. Mays & Alan Murray, 2016. "Optimization Model for the Sustainable Water Resource Management of River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 3247-3264, July.
    5. Ahmed Sattar & B. Gharabaghi & Edward McBean, 2016. "Prediction of Timing of Watermain Failure Using Gene Expression Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1635-1651, March.
    6. Amir Nafi & Jacques Tcheng & Patrick Beau, 2015. "Comprehensive Methodology for Overall Performance Assessment of Water Utilities," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5429-5450, December.
    7. Danuta Grosbois & Ryan Plummer, 2015. "Problematizing Water Vulnerability Indices at a Local Level: a Critical Review and Proposed Solution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5015-5035, November.
    8. Matthew Scanlan & Yves R. Filion, 2017. "Influence of Topography, Peak Demand, and Topology on Energy Use Patterns in four Small to Medium-Sized Systems in Ontario, Canada," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(4), pages 1361-1379, March.
    9. Kumar, M. D. & Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Sharma, Bharat R. & Trivedi, Kairav & Singh, O. P. & Sikka, Alok K. & van Dam, Jos C., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian Agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," IWMI Conference Proceedings 260570, International Water Management Institute.
    10. Kumar, M. Dinesh & Amarasinghe, Upali A., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Gentile, U. & Marrone, S. & Nardone, R. & Bellini, E., 2020. "Computer-aided security assessment of water networks monitoring platforms," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    12. World Bank, 2000. "Niger : Towards Water Resource Management," World Bank Publications - Reports 14981, The World Bank Group.
    13. Fátima Pérez & Laura Delgado-Antequera & Trinidad Gómez, 2019. "A Two-Phase Method to Assess the Sustainability of Water Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Jyotsna Pandey & Vemavarapu V. Srinivas, 2024. "Integrated Sustainability Index for Assessing the Performance of Water Distribution Network," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3707-3724, August.
    15. Nazli Aydin & Larry Mays & Theo Schmitt, 2014. "Technical and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(13), pages 4699-4713, October.
    16. Ardalan Izadi & Farhad Yazdandoost & Roza Ranjbar, 2020. "Asset-Based Assessment of Resiliency in Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1407-1422, March.
    17. Kumar, M. Dinesh & Amarasinghe, Upali A., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," IWMI Books, Reports H042634, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Ahmed M. A. Sattar & B. Gharabaghi & Edward A. McBean, 2016. "Prediction of Timing of Watermain Failure Using Gene Expression Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1635-1651, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:8-:d:1023739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.