IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i10p115-d1247594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waste Management in the Smart City: Current Practices and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Danuta Szpilko

    (International Department of Logistics and Service Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-312 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Antonio de la Torre Gallegos

    (Departament of Financial Economics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Seville, Ramón y Cajal 1, 41018 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Felix Jimenez Naharro

    (Departament of Financial Economics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Seville, Ramón y Cajal 1, 41018 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Agnieszka Rzepka

    (Department of Economics and Economic Management, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38 D, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Angelika Remiszewska

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-312 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

The discourse surrounding sustainability, particularly in the urban environment, has gained considerable momentum in recent years. The concept of a smart city epitomises the integration of innovative technological solutions with community-centred approaches, thereby laying the groundwork for a sustainable lifestyle. One of the crucial components of this integration is the effective and innovative management of waste. The aim of this article was to classify scientific research pertaining to waste management within the context of smart city issues, and to identify emerging directions for future research. A systematic literature review, based on a bibliometric analysis of articles included in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, was conducted for this study. The purpose of such a systematic review is to identify, integrate, and evaluate research on a selected topic, using clearly defined criteria. The research query included: TITLE-ABS-KEY (“smart city” AND (waste OR garbage OR trash OR rubbish)) in the case of Scopus, and TS = (“smart city” AND (waste OR garbage OR trash OR rubbish)) in the case of the Web of Science database. A total of 1768 publication records qualified for the analysis. This study presents an investigation into the current and forthcoming directions of waste management in smart cities, synthesising the latest advancements and methods. The findings outline specific future research directions encompassing technological advancement, special waste challenges, digitisation, energy recovery, transportation, community engagement, policy development, security, novel frameworks, economic and environmental impact assessment, and global implications. These insights reflect a multifaceted approach, advocating a technology-driven perspective that is integral to urban sustainability and quality of life. The study’s findings provide practical avenues for cities to enhance waste management through modern technologies, promoting efficient systems and contributing to sustainable urban living and the circular economy. The insights are vital for policymakers and industry leaders globally, supporting the creation of universal standards and policies, thereby fostering comprehensive waste management systems aligned with global sustainability objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Danuta Szpilko & Antonio de la Torre Gallegos & Felix Jimenez Naharro & Agnieszka Rzepka & Angelika Remiszewska, 2023. "Waste Management in the Smart City: Current Practices and Future Directions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:115-:d:1247594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/10/115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/10/115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild, 2017. "Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1857-1859, June.
    2. Martha María Mayes-Ramírez & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Ángel Fermín Ramos-Ridao & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2023. "Urban Waste: Visualizing the Academic Literature through Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Vítor Domingues Martinho & Paulo Reis Mourão, 2020. "Circular Economy and Economic Development in the European Union: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Vhuthu Ndou & Isaac Tebogo Rampedi, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management Research: Global and South African Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Nehal Elshaboury & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Ghasan Alfalah, 2022. "Construction and Demolition Waste Management Research: A Science Mapping Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Deniz Yalçıntaş & Suzan Oğuz & Eda Yaşa Özeltürkay & Murat Gülmez, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Sustainable Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernando Almeida & Cristina Machado Guimarães & Vasco Amorim, 2024. "Exploring the Differences and Similarities between Smart Cities and Sustainable Cities through an Integrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Aleksandra Gulc & Klaudia Budna, 2024. "Classification of Smart and Sustainable Urban Mobility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Stephen Mandiza Kalisha & Kondwani Godwin Munthali, 2024. "Multi-Factor GIS Modeling for Solid Waste Dumpsite Selection in Lilongwe, Malawi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Godlove Suila Kuaban & Valery Nkemeni & Onyeka J. Nwobodo & Piotr Czekalski & Fabien Mieyeville, 2024. "Internet of Things Adoption in Technology Ecosystems Within the Central African Region: The Case of Silicon Mountain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, 2021. "Food and Consumer Attitude(s): An Overview of the Most Relevant Documents," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Merve Karabeyeser Bakan, 2024. "A Roadmap for Reducing Construction Waste for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Lu Yu & Sichen Chen & Zhe Tan, 2024. "Analysis of Solid Waste Treatment and Management in Typical Chinese Industrial Parks with the Goal of Sustainable Development and Future Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Kasun Gomis & Ravindu Kahandawa & Ruchini Senarath Jayasinghe, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of the Global Scientific Literature on Circularity Indicators in the Construction and Built Environment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Zbigniew Korzeb & Paweł Niedziółka & Danuta Szpilko & Filippo Pietro, 2024. "ESG and climate-related risks versus traditional risks in commercial banking: A bibliometric and thematic review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Ishmael Onungwe & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Ian Jefferson, 2023. "Transition and Implementation of Circular Economy in Municipal Solid Waste Management System in Nigeria: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Simina Teodora Hora & Constantin Bungau & Paul Andrei Negru & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2023. "Implementing Circular Economy Elements in the Textile Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Lucija Ažman Momirski & Barbara Mušič & Boštjan Cotič, 2021. "Urban Strategies Enabling Industrial and Urban Symbiosis: The Case of Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. de Carvalho, Gustavo Dambiski Gomes & Sokulski, Carla Cristiane & da Silva, Wesley Vieira & de Carvalho, Hélio Gomes & de Moura, Rafael Vignoli & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & da Veiga, Claudimar Per, 2020. "Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    11. Neslihan Onur & Hale Alan & Hüsne Demirel & Ali Rıza Köker, 2024. "Digitalization and Digital Applications in Waste Recycling: An Integrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Giulia Chiaraluce & Deborah Bentivoglio & Adele Finco, 2021. "Circular Economy for a Sustainable Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Review for Current Trends and Future Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio & Jonathan Soto-Paz & Jhon Alexander Hernández-Cruz & Martha Cecilia Gómez-Herreño & Isabel Cristina Domínguez-Rivera & Edgar Ricardo Oviedo-Ocaña, 2023. "Evaluation of Biochar as an Additive in the Co-Composting of Green Waste and Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Emina Kristina Petrović & Caroline Ann Thomas, 2024. "Global Patterns in Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:115-:d:1247594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.