IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i6p51-d822897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate Analysis of Geological Data for Regional Studies of Geodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Erikstad

    (Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-0855 Oslo, Norway)

  • Vegar Bakkestuen

    (Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-0855 Oslo, Norway)

  • Rolv Dahl

    (Geological Survey of Norway, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Mari Lie Arntsen

    (Geological Survey of Norway, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Annina Margreth

    (Geological Survey of Norway, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Tine Larsen Angvik

    (Geological Survey of Norway, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Linda Wickström

    (Geological Survey of Sweden, SE-75128 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

In Norway, a landscape map exists which gives the opportunity to collect data in landscape units for further analysis. This study covers parts of Norway and Sweden, so the landscape map was extended into Sweden to form a unified landscape structure. A collection of geological and terrain data within landscape units can serve as a tool to describe the geodiversity profile of the units, study their geographical distribution and analyse similarities and dissimilarities between them. We collected geological and terrain data for an area covering large parts of southern Norway and Sweden. The data were collected as attributes in landscape polygons. The data were then analysed using multivariate techniques (Principle component analyses) where the first four axes of variation were definable. The first axis is a terrain axis, the second a bedrock unit axis, the third a bedrock diversity axis and the fourth a soil/sediment axis. In total, the four gradients answer for 54.9% of the total variation in the material. Links are found between the terrain data and geological units, but these links are relatively weak. The four gradients represent a step-less model of the geodiversity profile of the landscape areas but are dependent on the quality and scale of the input data. Norwegian and Swedish data had to be harmonised in order to be analysed together; however, because of this they ended up having a coarser resolution than desired, both spatially and scientifically. The stepless model was clustered to form 16 geodiversity profile groups for easy comparison and regional overview. The procedure can serve as a baseline for more detailed and field-based studies of geodiversity profiles, and give the opportunity to make analytical maps through simple overlay techniques and to compare areas with each other with respect to their geodiversity profile. This can be carried out both alone and in a wider landscape setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Erikstad & Vegar Bakkestuen & Rolv Dahl & Mari Lie Arntsen & Annina Margreth & Tine Larsen Angvik & Linda Wickström, 2022. "Multivariate Analysis of Geological Data for Regional Studies of Geodiversity," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:51-:d:822897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/6/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/6/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Marcin Siłuch & Waldemar Kociuba & Leszek Gawrysiak & Piotr Bartmiński, 2023. "Assessment and Quantitative Evaluation of Loess Area Geomorphodiversity Using Multiresolution DTMs (Roztocze Region, SE Poland)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:51-:d:822897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.