IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v7y2019i2p42-d238192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Connections: Examining Digital Library and Institutional Repository Use Overlap

Author

Listed:
  • Mark E. Phillips

    (University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA)

  • Pamela Andrews

    (University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA)

  • Ana Krahmer

    (University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA)

Abstract

The University of North Texas Libraries’ Digital Collections are situated as a unified whole within their preservation infrastructure, with three separate user interfaces serving the content to different audiences. These separate interfaces are: The UNT Digital Library (DL), The Portal to Texas History, and The Gateway to Oklahoma History. Situated within each interface are collections, and hosted within these collections are digital objects. One collection, the UNT Scholarly Works Repository, specifically serves UNT’s research and creative contributions and functions as the Institutional repository (IR) for the University of North Texas. Because UNT Scholarly works is seated as a collection amongst other collections, users can access faculty research, not just out of an interest in research from specific faculty members, but also as it ties into the user’s broader understanding of a given topic. With flexible infrastructure and metadata schema that connect collections beneath the umbrella of the wider preservation infrastructure, the UNT DL employs full-text searching and interlinked metadata to strengthen and make visible the connections between objects in different collections. This paper examined how users navigated between other collections within the UNT IR, as well as within the UNT DL. Through this examination, we observed patterns between how users navigated between objects, understood which collections may have related to one another, examined why some unique items were used more than others, and viewed the average number of items used within a session.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark E. Phillips & Pamela Andrews & Ana Krahmer, 2019. "Understanding Connections: Examining Digital Library and Institutional Repository Use Overlap," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:42-:d:238192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/2/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/2/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohua Zhu & Mark Antony Freeman, 2019. "An evaluation of U.S. municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(1), pages 27-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vigan Raca & Goran Velinov & Stefan Dzalev & Margita Kon-Popovska, 2022. "A Framework for Evaluation and Improvement of Open Government Data Quality: Application to the Western Balkans National Open Data Portals," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    2. Abdullah Almuqrin & Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdulaziz Alomran & Jeffrey Gauthier & Majed Abusharhah, 2022. "Factors Influencing Public Trust in Open Government Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:42-:d:238192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.