IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i3p269-d489356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Integrated Interval Rough MCDM Model for Ranking and Selection of Asphalt Production Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Bojan Matić

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Stanislav Jovanović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milan Marinković

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Siniša Sremac

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Dillip Kumar Das

    (Civil Engineering, Sustainable Transportation Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Kwazulu Natal, 238 Mazisi Kunene Rd, Glenwood, Durban 4041, South Africa)

  • Željko Stević

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of East Sarajevo, Vojvode Mišića 52, 74000 Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

Asphalt production plants play an important role in the field of civil engineering, but also in the entire economic system since the construction of roads enables uninterrupted functioning within it. In this paper, the ranking of asphalt production plants on the territory of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina has been performed. The modern economy needs contemporary models and methods to solve complicated MCDM problems and, for these purposes, it has been developed an original Interval Rough Number (IRN) Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model that implies an extension of two methods belonging to the field with interval rough numbers. After forming a list of eight most significant criteria for assessing the efficiency of asphalt production plants, the Interval Rough Number PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (IRN PIPRECIA) method was developed to determine the significance of the criteria. A total of 21 locations with asphalt mixture installation were considered. For that purpose, seven asphalt production plants were included, and for their ranking, the IRN EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method was created. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel interval rough model that can be useful for determining the efficiency of asphalt production plants. Averaging in group decision-making (GDM) for both methods was performed using an IRN Dombi weighted geometric averaging (IRNDWGA) aggregator. The obtained results show that (A15) Ruma (SP)–Mačvanska Mitrovica–Zasavica has the best characteristics out of the set of locations considered in this study. However, Alternatives A6 and A19 are also variants with remarkably good characteristics since there is very little difference in values compared to the first-ranked alternative. Also, the obtained results have shown that the developed model is applicable, which is proven through a comparative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojan Matić & Stanislav Jovanović & Milan Marinković & Siniša Sremac & Dillip Kumar Das & Željko Stević, 2021. "A Novel Integrated Interval Rough MCDM Model for Ranking and Selection of Asphalt Production Plants," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:269-:d:489356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/3/269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/3/269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    2. Srđan Dimić & Dragan Pamučar & Srđan Ljubojević & Boban Đorović, 2016. "Strategic Transport Management Models—The Case Study of an Oil Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Dragisa STANUJKIC & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Florentin SMARANDACHE & Zenonas TURSKIS, 2017. "The Use Of The Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Method For Determining The Weights Of Criteria," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 116-133, December.
    4. Giuseppe Sollazzo & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Clara Celauro, 2020. "Impact Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment of Asphalt Production from Primary Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donghun Lee, 2022. "Knowledge Gradient: Capturing Value of Information in Iterative Decisions under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmut BAKIR & Şahap AKAN & Kasım KIRACI & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Dragisa STANUJKIC & Gabrijela POPOVIC, 2020. "Multiple-Criteria Approach of the Operational Performance Evaluation in the Airline Industry: Evidence from the Emerging Markets," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 149-172, July.
    2. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Dragan Pamucar & Abhijit Saha, 2024. "An integrated Pythagorean fuzzy fairly operator-based MARCOS method for solving the sustainable circular supplier selection problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 523-564, November.
    3. Vaida Zemlickienė & Indrė Lapinskaitė & Zenonas Turskis, 2022. "Internal Communication in R&D: Decision-Making Methods Based on Expert Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Franciely Velozo Aragão & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli & Fernanda Cavicchioli Zola & Emanuely Velozo Aragão & Luis Henrique Nogueira Marinho & Ana Lidia Cascales Correa & João Carlos Colmenero, 2023. "Smart Cities Maturity Model—A Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Anda Ligia Belc & Adrian Ciutina & Raluca Buzatu & Florin Belc & Ciprian Costescu, 2021. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Different Warm Mix Asphalts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Anastasia Christodoulou & Zeeshan Raza & Johan Woxenius, 2019. "The Integration of RoRo Shipping in Sustainable Intermodal Transport Chains: The Case of a North European RoRo Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Mulian Zheng & Wang Chen & Xiaoyan Ding & Wenwu Zhang & Sixin Yu, 2021. "Comprehensive Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Preventive Maintenance Techniques for Asphalt Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Namin, Farhad Samimi & Ghadi, Aliakbar & Saki, Farshad, 2022. "A literature review of Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) towards mining method selection (MMS)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Wang, Junqi & Cao, Hongjun, 2022. "Improving competitive strategic decisions of Chinese coal companies toward green transformation: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Dražen Žgaljić & Edvard Tijan & Alen Jugović & Tanja Poletan Jugović, 2019. "Implementation of Sustainable Motorways of the Sea Services Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Croatian Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Marina Nikolić Topalović & Milenko Stanković & Goran Ćirović & Dragan Pamučar, 2018. "Comparison of the Applied Measures on the Simulated Scenarios for the Sustainable Building Construction through Carbon Footprint Emissions—Case Study of Building Construction in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Anna Trembecka & Grzegorz Ginda & Anita Kwartnik-Pruc, 2023. "Application of the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Method to Assess Factors Influencing the Development of Cycling Infrastructure in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Mališa Žižović & Dragan Pamučar & Miloljub Albijanić & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ivan Pribićević, 2020. "Eliminating Rank Reversal Problem Using a New Multi-Attribute Model—The RAFSI Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Michael R. Gruber & Bernhard Hofko, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Recycled Asphalt Pavement Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Józef Ciuła & Elżbieta Sobiecka & Tomasz Zacłona & Paulina Rydwańska & Aneta Oleksy-Gębczyk & Tomasz P. Olejnik & Sławomir Jurkowski, 2024. "Management of the Municipal Waste Stream: Waste into Energy in the Context of a Circular Economy—Economic and Technological Aspects for a Selected Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Saheeb Ahmed Kayani & Salman Sagheer Warsi & Raja Awais Liaqait, 2023. "A Smart Decision Support Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, March.
    18. Edvard Tijan & Adrijana Agatić & Marija Jović & Saša Aksentijević, 2019. "Maritime National Single Window—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Seaport Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Maciej Urbaniak & Blanka Tundys & Magdalena Ankiel, 2021. "Expectations of Production Companies Operating in Poland towards Suppliers with Regards to Implementation of the Sustainability Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Giovanni Leonardi & Federica Suraci, 2022. "A 3D-FE Model for the Rutting Prediction in Geogrid Reinforced Flexible Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:269-:d:489356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.