IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i21p2788-d671322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observation of a Change in Human Attitude in a Decision Making Process Equipped with an Interference of a Third Party

Author

Listed:
  • Asma Mahmood

    (Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mohsan Raza

    (Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In this paper, the attitudes of experts are observed for the possible changes after taking a certain decision. The decision is taken by two persons with different fields of expertise. There is also an annotation of such changes due to the interference of a third person, which is main idea of this paper. These observations are done by developing fuzzy soft differential equations with the help of optimum fuzzy soft constants (OFSCs), which are obtained through the ranking coefficients. The ranking of alternatives is based on the coefficients, which are obtained through a decision-making process. Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is exploited to rank the alternatives, and the attitudes of resource persons are examined through phase portraits and line graphs of the respective system of differential equations. The utilization of TOPSIS is a practice of multi-criteria decision-making in the analysis of human behaviours. Dual hesitant fuzzy soft sets are taken to represent the initial data.

Suggested Citation

  • Asma Mahmood & Mohsan Raza, 2021. "Observation of a Change in Human Attitude in a Decision Making Process Equipped with an Interference of a Third Party," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:21:p:2788-:d:671322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/21/2788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/21/2788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Zhu & Zeshui Xu & Meimei Xia, 2012. "Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-13, May.
    2. Fuqiang Wang & Xihua Li & Xiaohong Chen, 2014. "Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Set and Its Applications in Multicriteria Decision Making," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, July.
    3. Khalid, Asma & Beg, Ismat, 2018. "Influence model of evasive decision makers," MPRA Paper 95493, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Muhammad Jabir Khan & Poom Kumam & Peide Liu & Wiyada Kumam & Shahzaib Ashraf, 2019. "A Novel Approach to Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets and Its Application in Decision Support System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Chaube, Shshank & Joshi, Dheeraj Kumar & Ujarari, Chandan Singh, 2023. "Hesitant Bifuzzy Set (an introduction): A new approach to assess the reliability of the systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 98-107.
    4. Hui Gao & Linggang Ran & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei & Jiang Wu, 2020. "VIKOR Method for MAGDM Based on Q-Rung Interval-Valued Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Its Application to Supplier Selection of Medical Consumption Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Li Li & Hegong Lei & Jun Wang, 2020. "Q -Rung Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-34, September.
    7. Huiping Chen & Guiqiong Xu & Pingle Yang, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Muhammad Sarwar Sindhu & Muhammad Ahsan & Khalil Ahmad & Imran Ameen Khan, 2024. "Modeling of Decision-Making Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 720-729.
    9. Palash Dutta & Rupjit Saikia, 2020. "A Decision-making Approach for Choosing a Reliable Product under the Hesitant Fuzzy Environment via a Novel Distance Measure," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 45(3), pages 147-159, September.
    10. Mei Tang & Jie Wang & Jianping Lu & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei & Yu Wei, 2019. "Dual Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Sonam & Ramakant Bhardwaj & Satyendra Narayan, 2023. "Fixed Point Results in Soft Fuzzy Metric Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Wang Feng, 2019. "Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 70-89, February.
    13. Saleem Abdullah & Alaa O. Almagrabi & Ihsan Ullah, 2023. "A New Approach to Artificial Intelligent Based Three-Way Decision Making and Analyzing S-Box Image Encryption Using TOPSIS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Pavle Milošević & Bratislav Petrović & Ivana Dragović, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on Interpolative Boolean Algebra," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Huan Zhou & Jing Wang & Xin-E. Li & Jian-qiang Wang, 2016. "Intuitionistic hesitant linguistic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 131-160, April.
    16. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2023. "Exploring the hyperledger blockchain technology disruption and barriers of blockchain adoption in petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Fanyong Meng & Aiqing Zeng & Jie Tang & Witold Pedrycz, 2023. "Ranking Objects from Individual Linguistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information in View of Optimal Model-Based Consistency and Consensus Iteration Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 5-44, February.
    18. Xiaonan Ji & Lixia Yu & Jiapei Fu, 2019. "Evaluating Personal Default Risk in P2P Lending Platform: Based on Dual Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy TODIM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Chachra, Aayushi & Kumar, Akshay & Ram, Mangey, 2023. "Intuitionistic fuzzy approach to reliability assessment of multi-state systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 489-503.
    20. Harish Garg & Gagandeep Kaur, 2018. "Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators with New Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-30, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:21:p:2788-:d:671322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.