IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i13p1529-d584793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Objective Bayesian Approach with Dynamic Optimization (MOBADO). A Hybrid of Decision Theory and Machine Learning Applied to Customs Fraud Control in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Ignacio González García

    (Decision Analysis and Statistic Group, Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial, Campus de Montegancedo s/n, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alfonso Mateos Caballero

    (Decision Analysis and Statistic Group, Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial, Campus de Montegancedo s/n, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

This paper studies the economically significant problem of the optimization of customs fraud control, which is a critical issue for many countries. The European Union (EU) alone handles 4693 tons of goods every minute (2018 figures). Even though 70% of goods are imported at zero tariff, the EU raised EUR 25.4 billions in 2018, and customs-related income transferred by member states to the EU accounts for nearly 13% of its overall budget. In this field, (a) the conflicting objectives are qualitative and cannot be reduced to a common measure (security and terrorism, health, drug market access control, taxes, etc.); (b) each submitted item has dozens of characteristics; (c) there are constraints; and (d) risk analysis systems have to make decisions in real time. Although the World Customs Organization has promoted the use of artificial intelligence to increase the precision of controls, the problem is very complex due to the data characteristics and interpretability, which is a requirement established by customs officers. In this paper, we propose a new Bayesian-based hybrid approach combining machine learning and multi-objective linear programming (MOLP), called multi-objective Bayesian with dynamic optimization (MOBADO). We demonstrate that it is possible to more than double (with a 237% increase) the precision of current inspection systems, freeing up almost 50% of human resources, and outperform past results with respect to each of the above objectives. MOBADO is an optimization technique that could be combined with any artificial intelligence approach capable of optimizing the quality of multi-objective risk analysis in real time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ignacio González García & Alfonso Mateos Caballero, 2021. "A Multi-Objective Bayesian Approach with Dynamic Optimization (MOBADO). A Hybrid of Decision Theory and Machine Learning Applied to Customs Fraud Control in Spain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:13:p:1529-:d:584793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/13/1529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/13/1529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand Laporte, 2011. "Risk management systems: using data mining in developing countries' customs administration," Post-Print halshs-00601379, HAL.
    2. Ousmane COUNDOUL & Massene GADIAGA & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2012. "Inspecting less to inspect better: The use of data mining for risk management by customs administrations," Working Papers P46, FERDI.
    3. Irina Vinogradova, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods as a Part of Mathematical Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Liliana Ionescu-Feleaga & Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu & Dumitru-Florin Moise, 2023. "A Decade for the Mathematics : Bibliometric Analysis of Mathematical Modeling in Economics, Ecology, and Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel CARIOLLE & Cyril CHALENDARD & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2016. "Décloisonner l’analyse des données pour appuyer la modernisation des douanes : une illustration à partir du Gabon," Working Papers 201618, CERDI.
    2. Joel CARIOLLE & Cyril CHALENDARD & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2017. "Going beyond analysis of internal data to support customs modernization: A case study in Gabon," Working Papers 201723, CERDI.
    3. Ana Margarida Fernandes & Russell Hillberry & Alejandra Mendoza Alcántara, 2021. "Trade Effects of Customs Reform: Evidence from Albania," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(1), pages 34-57.
    4. Christian Volpe Martincus, 2016. "Out of the Border Labyrinth: An Assessment of Trade Facilitation Initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 96856, February.
    5. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2021. "Application of Bayesian Approach to Reduce the Uncertainty in Expert Judgments by Using a Posteriori Mean Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Volpe Martincus, Christian & Carballo, Jerónimo & Graziano, Alejandro, 2015. "Customs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 119-137.
    7. Ousmane COUNDOUL & Massene GADIAGA & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2012. "Inspecting less to inspect better: The use of data mining for risk management by customs administrations," Working Papers P46, FERDI.
    8. Máximo Méndez & Mariano Frutos & Fabio Miguel & Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo, 2020. "TOPSIS Decision on Approximate Pareto Fronts by Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Application to an Engineering Design Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Cheng-An Tsai & Tien-Hwa Ho & Jyh-Shyan Lin & Chien-Chih Tu & Che-Wei Chang, 2021. "Model for Evaluating Outsourcing Logistics Companies in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Olubayo Babatunde & Michael Emezirinwune & John Adebisi & Khadeejah A. Abdulsalam & Busola Akintayo & Oludolapo Olanrewaju, 2024. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach for Selecting Sustainable Power Systems Simulation Software in Undergraduate Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Thomas Orliac, 2012. "The economics of trade facilitation [L'économie de la facilitation des échanges]," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03681980, HAL.
    12. Ousmane COUNDOUL & Massene GADIAGA & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2012. "Contrôler moins pour contrôler mieux : l’utilisation du data mining pour la gestion du risque en douane," Working Papers P46, FERDI.
    13. Volpe Martincus, Christian & Carballo, Jerónimo & Graziano, Alejandro, 2015. "Customs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 119-137.
    14. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    15. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2024. "Centroidous Method for Determining Objective Weights," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2016. "Out of the Border Labyrinth: An Assessment of Trade Facilitation Initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 7994, December.
    17. Ramesh Allipour Birgani & Amirhossein Takian & Abolghasem Djazayery & Ali Kianirad & Hamed Pouraram, 2022. "Climate Change and Food Security Prioritizing Indices: Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Social Network Analysis (SNA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Daniel Fernández & Álvaro Rodríguez-Prieto & Ana M. Camacho, 2022. "Optimal Parameters Selection in Advanced Multi-Metallic Co-Extrusion Based on Independent MCDM Analytical Approaches and Numerical Simulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:13:p:1529-:d:584793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.