IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i10p1138-d556771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Class of Estimators Based on a General Relative Loss Function

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Hu

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Baosheng Liang

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
    Current Address: Room 617, Yifu Building, Xueyuan Rd., Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.)

Abstract

Motivated by the relative loss estimator of the median, we propose a new class of estimators for linear quantile models using a general relative loss function defined by the Box–Cox transformation function. The proposed method is very flexible. It includes a traditional quantile regression and median regression under the relative loss as special cases. Compared to the traditional linear quantile estimator, the proposed estimator has smaller variance and hence is more efficient in making statistical inferences. We show that, in theory, the proposed estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal under appropriate conditions. Extensive simulation studies were conducted, demonstrating good performance of the proposed method. An application of the proposed method in a prostate cancer study is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Hu & Baosheng Liang, 2021. "A New Class of Estimators Based on a General Relative Loss Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:10:p:1138-:d:556771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/10/1138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/10/1138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guosheng Yin & Jianwen Cai, 2005. "Quantile Regression Models with Multivariate Failure Time Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 151-161, March.
    2. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Quantile regression 40 years on," CeMMAP working papers CWP36/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    4. Chen, Kani & Guo, Shaojun & Lin, Yuanyuan & Ying, Zhiliang, 2010. "Least Absolute Relative Error Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(491), pages 1104-1112.
    5. Powell, James L., 1986. "Censored regression quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 143-155, June.
    6. Joshua Angrist & Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val, 2006. "Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S. Wage Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 539-563, March.
    7. Pollard, David, 1991. "Asymptotics for Least Absolute Deviation Regression Estimators," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 186-199, June.
    8. Wang, Huixia Judy & Wang, Lan, 2009. "Locally Weighted Censored Quantile Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1117-1128.
    9. Gneiting, Tilmann, 2011. "Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 746-762.
    10. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Quantile Regression: 40 Years On," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 155-176, September.
    11. Peng, Limin & Huang, Yijian, 2008. "Survival Analysis With Quantile Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 637-649, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Shangyu & Wan, Alan T.K. & Zhou, Yong, 2015. "Quantile regression methods with varying-coefficient models for censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 154-172.
    2. Jiang, Rong & Qian, Weimin & Zhou, Zhangong, 2012. "Variable selection and coefficient estimation via composite quantile regression with randomly censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 308-317.
    3. Akram Yazdani & Hojjat Zeraati & Mehdi Yaseri & Shahpar Haghighat & Ahmad Kaviani, 2022. "Laplace regression with clustered censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1041-1068, July.
    4. Tatsushi Oka & Ken Yamada, 2023. "Heterogeneous Impact of the Minimum Wage: Implications for Changes in Between- and Within-Group Inequality," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 58(1), pages 335-362.
    5. Wei, Bo & Tan, Kean Ming & He, Xuming, 2024. "Estimation of complier expected shortfall treatment effects with a binary instrumental variable," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    6. Xianghua Luo & Chiung-Yu Huang & Lan Wang, 2013. "Quantile Regression for Recurrent Gap Time Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 375-385, June.
    7. Lin, Guixian & He, Xuming & Portnoy, Stephen, 2012. "Quantile regression with doubly censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 797-812.
    8. Ruofan Xu & Jiti Gao & Tatsushi Oka & Yoon-Jae Whang, 2022. "Quantile Random-Coefficient Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects: Heterogeneous Group-Level Policy Evaluation," Papers 2208.03632, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    9. Jiang Du & Zhongzhan Zhang & Tianfa Xie, 2017. "Focused information criterion and model averaging in censored quantile regression," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(5), pages 547-570, July.
    10. Jung-Yu Cheng & Shinn-Jia Tzeng, 2014. "Quantile regression of right-censored length-biased data using the Buckley–James-type method," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1571-1592, December.
    11. Yunwen Yang & Huixia Judy Wang & Xuming He, 2016. "Posterior Inference in Bayesian Quantile Regression with Asymmetric Laplace Likelihood," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 327-344, December.
    12. Ruofan Xu & Jiti Gao & Tatsushi Oka & Yoon-Jae Whang, 2022. "Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Quantile Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects," Papers 2208.03632, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    13. De Backer, Mickael & El Ghouch, Anouar & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2017. "An Adapted Loss Function for Censored Quantile Regression," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2017003, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Ying Cui & Limin Peng, 2022. "Assessing dynamic covariate effects with survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 675-699, October.
    15. Guillen, Montserrat & Bermúdez, Lluís & Pitarque, Albert, 2021. "Joint generalized quantile and conditional tail expectation regression for insurance risk analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Chen, Zhao & Cheng, Vivian Xinyi & Liu, Xu, 2024. "Reprint: Hypothesis testing on high dimensional quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(2).
    17. Damian Clarke & Manuel Llorca Jaña & Daniel Pailañir, 2023. "The use of quantile methods in economic history," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 115-132, April.
    18. De Silva, Dakshina G. & Kosmopoulou, Georgia & Lamarche, Carlos, 2017. "Subcontracting and the survival of plants in the road construction industry: A panel quantile regression analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 113-131.
    19. Ruosha Li & Limin Peng, 2017. "Assessing quantile prediction with censored quantile regression models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 517-528, June.
    20. Xiaofeng Lv & Gupeng Zhang & Xinkuo Xu & Qinghai Li, 2019. "Weighted quantile regression for censored data with application to export duration data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1161-1192, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:10:p:1138-:d:556771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.