IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2020i1p13-d466842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Financial Valuation Risk in Pepper Production: The Use of Decoupled Net Present Value

Author

Listed:
  • Josefa López-Marín

    (Department of Crop Production and Agri-technology, IMIDA, 30150 Murcia, Spain)

  • Amparo Gálvez

    (Department of Crop Production and Agri-technology, IMIDA, 30150 Murcia, Spain)

  • Francisco M. del Amor

    (Department of Crop Production and Agri-technology, IMIDA, 30150 Murcia, Spain)

  • Jose M. Brotons

    (Department of Economic and Financial Studies, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, 03202 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Greenhouse peppers are one of the most important crops globally. However, as in any production activity, especially agricultural, they are subject to important risk factors such as price fluctuations, pests, or the use of bad quality water. This article aims to evaluate the viability of these types of crops by using discounted cash flows. Risk evaluation has been carried out through the analysis of pepper plantations for 2016 and 2017. The traditional application of this tool has significant limitations, such as the discount rate to be used or the estimation of future cash flows. However, by using discount functions that decrease over time in combination with decoupled net present value, these limitations are expected to improve. The use of decoupled net present value has permitted an increase in the accuracy and quantification of risks, isolating the main risks such as price drops (EUR 3720 ha −1 year −1 ) and structural risks (EUR 1622 € ha −1 year −1 ). The use of decreasing discount functions has permitted a more realistic investment estimation. Finally, the sensitivity analysis shows that decoupled net present value (DNPV) is little affected by changes in interest rates in contrast to traditional net present value (NPV).

Suggested Citation

  • Josefa López-Marín & Amparo Gálvez & Francisco M. del Amor & Jose M. Brotons, 2020. "The Financial Valuation Risk in Pepper Production: The Use of Decoupled Net Present Value," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:13-:d:466842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Henderson & Ian Bateman, 1995. "Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 413-423, June.
    2. Espinoza, R. David & Rojo, Javier, 2017. "Towards sustainable mining (Part I): Valuing investment opportunities in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 7-18.
    3. Adam Borison, 2005. "Real Options Analysis: Where Are the Emperor's Clothes?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 17(2), pages 17-31, March.
    4. David Espinoza & Javier Rojo & Arturo Cifuentes & Jeremy Morris, 2020. "DNPV: a valuation methodology for infrastructure and Capital investments consistent with prospect theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 259-274, March.
    5. Harvey M. Wagner, 1995. "Global Sensitivity Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 948-969, December.
    6. Ben Groom & Cameron Hepburn & Phoebe Koundouri & David Pearce, 2005. "Declining Discount Rates: The Long and the Short of it," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 32(4), pages 445-493, December.
    7. Henry H. Willis, 2007. "Guiding Resource Allocations Based on Terrorism Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 597-606, June.
    8. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1996. "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13(2), pages 231-257, April.
    9. Savvas, D. & Stamati, E. & Tsirogiannis, I.L. & Mantzos, N. & Barouchas, P.E. & Katsoulas, N. & Kittas, C., 2007. "Interactions between salinity and irrigation frequency in greenhouse pepper grown in closed-cycle hydroponic systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-3), pages 102-111, July.
    10. Mehra, Rajnish (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780444508997.
    11. David Espinoza & Jeremy W.F. Morris, 2013. "Decoupled NPV: a simple, improved method to value infrastructure investments," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 471-496, May.
    12. Espinoza, R. David & Rojo, Javier, 2015. "Using DNPV for valuing investments in the energy sector: A solar project case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 44-49.
    13. George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 1992. "Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 573-597.
    14. Mark R. Manfredo & Raymond M. Leuthold, 1999. "Value-at-Risk Analysis: A Review and the Potential for Agricultural Applications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 99-111.
    15. Nicola Chiara & Michael Garvin, 2008. "Variance models for project financial risk analysis with applications to greenfield BOT highway projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 925-939.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winkler, Ralph, 2009. "Now or Never: Environmental Protection under Hyperbolic Discounting," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 3, pages 1-22.
    2. Dorje C. Brody & Lane P. Hughston, 2013. "Social Discounting and the Long Rate of Interest," Papers 1306.5145, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    3. Dorje C. Brody & Lane P. Hughston, 2018. "Social Discounting And The Long Rate Of Interest," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 306-334, January.
    4. Ben Groom & Cameron Hepburn & Phoebe Koundouri & David Pearce, 2007. "Implications of declining discount rates: Climate Change Policy in the UK," DEOS Working Papers 0702, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    5. Dou, Shi-quan & Liu, Jiang-yi & Xiao, Jian-zhong & Pan, Wen, 2020. "Economic feasibility valuing of deep mineral resources based on risk analysis: Songtao manganese ore - China case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Jouini, Elyès & Marin, Jean-Michel & Napp, Clotilde, 2010. "Discounting and divergence of opinion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 830-859, March.
    7. Weitzman, Martin L., 1998. "Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 201-208, November.
    8. D. Espinoza & J. Morris & H. Baroud & M. Bisogno & A. Cifuentes & A. Gentzoglanis & L. Luccioni & J. Rojo & F. Vahedifard, 2020. "The role of traditional discounted cash flows in the tragedy of the horizon: another inconvenient truth," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 643-660, April.
    9. Penyalver, Domingo & Turró, Mateu & Zavala-Rojas, Diana, 2018. "Intergenerational perception of the utility of major transport projects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 97-111.
    10. Winkler, Ralph, 2006. "Does 'better' discounting lead to 'worse' outcomes in long-run decisions? The dilemma of hyperbolic discounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 573-582, June.
    11. Defrancesco, Edi & Gatto, Paola & Rosato, Paolo, 2014. "A ‘component-based’ approach to discounting for natural resource damage assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Hansen, Anders Chr., 2006. "Do declining discount rates lead to time inconsistent economic advice?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 138-144, November.
    13. Le Kama, Alain Ayong & Schubert, Katheline, 2007. "A Note On The Consequences Of An Endogenous Discounting Depending On The Environmental Quality," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 272-289, April.
    14. Aline Chiabai & Ibon Galarraga & Anil Markandya & Unai Pascual, 2013. "The Equivalency Principle for Discounting the Value of Natural Assets: An Application to an Investment Project in the Basque Coast," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(4), pages 535-550, December.
    15. Onno J. Kuik & Barbara Bucher & Michela Catenacci & Etem Karakaya & Richard S.J. Tol, 2006. "Methodological aspects of recent climate change damage cost studies," Working Papers FNU-122, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Dec 2006.
    16. Mikhail V. Sokolov, 2023. "NPV, IRR, PI, PP, and DPP: a unified view," Papers 2302.02875, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    17. Teschner, Benjamin & Holley, Elizabeth, 2021. "The cost of mine suspension from social conflict: A decision tree model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Geoffrey Heal & Antony Millner, 2013. "Discounting under Disagreement," NBER Working Papers 18999, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Espinoza, R. David & Rojo, Javier, 2017. "Towards sustainable mining (Part I): Valuing investment opportunities in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 7-18.
    20. Tol, Richard S.J., 2013. "Targets for global climate policy: An overview," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 911-928.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:13-:d:466842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.