IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i8p1245-d392001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Learning Methods for Modeling Bitcoin Price

Author

Listed:
  • Prosper Lamothe-Fernández

    (Department of Financing and Commercial Research, UDI of Financing, Calle Francisco Tomás y Valiente, 5, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • David Alaminos

    (Department of Economic Theory and Economic History, Campus El Ejido s/n, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • Prosper Lamothe-López

    (Rho Finanzas Partner, Calle de Zorrilla, 21, 28014 Madrid, Spain)

  • Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Campus El Ejido s/n, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

Abstract

A precise prediction of Bitcoin price is an important aspect of digital financial markets because it improves the valuation of an asset belonging to a decentralized control market. Numerous studies have studied the accuracy of models from a set of factors. Hence, previous literature shows how models for the prediction of Bitcoin suffer from poor performance capacity and, therefore, more progress is needed on predictive models, and they do not select the most significant variables. This paper presents a comparison of deep learning methodologies for forecasting Bitcoin price and, therefore, a new prediction model with the ability to estimate accurately. A sample of 29 initial factors was used, which has made possible the application of explanatory factors of different aspects related to the formation of the price of Bitcoin. To the sample under study, different methods have been applied to achieve a robust model, namely, deep recurrent convolutional neural networks, which have shown the importance of transaction costs and difficulty in Bitcoin price, among others. Our results have a great potential impact on the adequacy of asset pricing against the uncertainties derived from digital currencies, providing tools that help to achieve stability in cryptocurrency markets. Our models offer high and stable success results for a future prediction horizon, something useful for asset valuation of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

Suggested Citation

  • Prosper Lamothe-Fernández & David Alaminos & Prosper Lamothe-López & Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez, 2020. "Deep Learning Methods for Modeling Bitcoin Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:8:p:1245-:d:392001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/8/1245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/8/1245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel Ciaian & Miroslava Rajcaniova & d’Artis Kancs, 2016. "The economics of BitCoin price formation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(19), pages 1799-1815, April.
    2. Aniruddha Dutta & Saket Kumar & Meheli Basu, 2020. "A Gated Recurrent Unit Approach to Bitcoin Price Prediction," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Zhang, G. Peter & Qi, Min, 2005. "Neural network forecasting for seasonal and trend time series," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 501-514, January.
    4. Osamah Al-Khazali & Elie Bouri & David Roubaud, 2018. "The impact of positive and negative macroeconomic news surprises: Gold versus Bitcoin," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 373-382.
    5. Balcilar, Mehmet & Bouri, Elie & Gupta, Rangan & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 74-81.
    6. Spyros Makridakis & Evangelos Spiliotis & Vassilios Assimakopoulos, 2018. "Statistical and Machine Learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Rainer Schmidt & Michael Möhring & Daniel Glück & Ralf Haerting & Barbara Keller & Christopher Reichstein, 2016. "Benefits from Using Bitcoin: Empirical Evidence from a European Country," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 7(4), pages 48-62, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaolong Tang & Yuping Song & Xingrui Jiao & Yankun Sun, 2024. "On Forecasting Realized Volatility for Bitcoin Based on Deep Learning PSO–GRU Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 2011-2033, May.
    2. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Kong, Xiao-Lin & Baltas, Konstantinos & Zureigat, Qasim, 2022. "Past, present, and future of the application of machine learning in cryptocurrency research," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Chenlu Dang & Fan Wang & Zimo Yang & Hongxia Zhang & Yufeng Qian, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating and forecasting the risks of small to medium-sized enterprises in the supply chain finance market using blockchain technology and deep learning model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 662-675, December.
    4. Nagula, Pavan Kumar & Alexakis, Christos, 2022. "A new hybrid machine learning model for predicting the bitcoin (BTC-USD) price," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    5. Bhaskar Tripathi & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Modeling Bitcoin Prices using Signal Processing Methods, Bayesian Optimization, and Deep Neural Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1919-1945, December.
    6. Jingjing Li & Xinge Rao & Xianyi Li & Sihai Guan, 2022. "Gold and Bitcoin Optimal Portfolio Research and Analysis Based on Machine-Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Wang, Hao & Wang, Xiaoqian & Yin, Siyuan & Ji, Hao, 2022. "The asymmetric contagion effect between stock market and cryptocurrency market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Siwen, 2018. "Exploring the Driving Forces of the Bitcoin Exchange Rate Dynamics: An EGARCH Approach," MPRA Paper 89445, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ji Ho Kwon, 2021. "On the factors of Bitcoin’s value at risk," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Toan Luu Duc Huynh, 2019. "Spillover Risks on Cryptocurrency Markets: A Look from VAR-SVAR Granger Causality and Student’s-t Copulas," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Fang, Tong & Su, Zhi & Yin, Libo, 2020. "Economic fundamentals or investor perceptions? The role of uncertainty in predicting long-term cryptocurrency volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Huthaifa Alqaralleh & Alaa Adden Abuhommous & Ahmad Alsaraireh, 2020. "Modelling and Forecasting the Volatility of Cryptocurrencies: A Comparison of Nonlinear GARCH-Type Models," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 346-356, July.
    6. Elie Bouri & Mahamitra Das & Rangan Gupta & David Roubaud, 2018. "Spillovers between Bitcoin and other assets during bear and bull markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(55), pages 5935-5949, November.
    7. Svetoslav Borisov, 2024. "Bitcoin – Hedge or Speculative Asset: Analysis of Its Role and Nature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 148-170.
    8. Emon Kalyan Chowdhury & Mohammad Nayeem Abdullah, 2024. "Gauging Demand for Cryptocurrency over the Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Volatility," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 37-55, July.
    9. Rodrigo Hakim das Neves, 2020. "Bitcoin pricing: impact of attractiveness variables," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Hewamalage, Hansika & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bandara, Kasun, 2021. "Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current status and future directions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 388-427.
    12. Bouri, Elie & Gupta, Rangan & Lahiani, Amine & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2018. "Testing for asymmetric nonlinear short- and long-run relationships between bitcoin, aggregate commodity and gold prices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 224-235.
    13. Aurelio F. Bariviera & Ignasi Merediz‐Solà, 2021. "Where Do We Stand In Cryptocurrencies Economic Research? A Survey Based On Hybrid Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 377-407, April.
    14. Bhuiyan, Rubaiyat Ahsan & Husain, Afzol & Zhang, Changyong, 2021. "A wavelet approach for causal relationship between bitcoin and conventional asset classes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Jamal Bouoiyour & Refk Selmi, 2017. "The Bitcoin price formation: Beyond the fundamental sources," Working Papers hal-01548710, HAL.
    16. Christian Conrad & Anessa Custovic & Eric Ghysels, 2018. "Long- and Short-Term Cryptocurrency Volatility Components: A GARCH-MIDAS Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Abdelkader Derbali & Lamia Jamel & Monia Ben Ltaifa & Ahmed K. Elnagar, 2020. "Return, Volatility and Shock Spillovers of Bitcoin with Energy Commodities," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 10(3), pages 157-170.
    18. Gaies, Brahim & Nakhli, Mohamed Sahbi & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Schweizer, Denis, 2023. "Interactions between investors’ fear and greed sentiment and Bitcoin prices," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Flori, Andrea, 2019. "News and subjective beliefs: A Bayesian approach to Bitcoin investments," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-356.
    20. Icaro Romolo Sousa Agostino & Wesley Vieira da Silva & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2020. "Forecasting models in the manufacturing processes and operations management: Systematic literature review," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(7), pages 1043-1056, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:8:p:1245-:d:392001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.