IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i2p180-d315629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discovering Systemic Risks of China's Listed Banks by CoVaR Approach in the Digital Economy Era

Author

Listed:
  • Huichen Jiang

    (Chinese Academy of Engineering Frontier Strategy, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Jun Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Engineering Frontier Strategy, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The world has entered the digital economy era. As a developing country, China's banking industry plays an important role in the financial industry, and its size ranks first in the world. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the systemic risks of China's banks in the digital economy era. We first compare the traditional indicator approach and the market-based approach theoretically, and Conditional Value at Risk (CoVaR) model, a market-based approach, is considered to be an efficient way to discover systemic risk in different perspectives. Based on static and dynamic models, we evaluate the contributions of sixteen China's listed banks to the systemic risk. Furthermore, we model bank exposures, extend the models by considering extreme circumstance, and incorporate the effects of Fintech and non-bank financial institutions. The results show the levels of systemic risks and the corresponding systemic importance rankings vary in different time periods. We find that the contributions of some small banks to systemic risk are even higher than some big banks during the sample period. Moreover, the big banks face less risks than most of the small banks when the banking system is in distress. We make suggestions for improving financial supervision and maintaining financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Huichen Jiang & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Discovering Systemic Risks of China's Listed Banks by CoVaR Approach in the Digital Economy Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:180-:d:315629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acharya, Viral V. & Yorulmazer, Tanju, 2007. "Too many to fail--An analysis of time-inconsistency in bank closure policies," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Souza, Sergio Rubens Stancato de & Silva, Thiago Christiano & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Guerra, Solange Maria, 2016. "Evaluating systemic risk using bank default probabilities in financial networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 54-75.
    3. López-Espinosa, Germán & Moreno, Antonio & Rubia, Antonio & Valderrama, Laura, 2012. "Short-term wholesale funding and systemic risk: A global CoVaR approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3150-3162.
    4. Girardi, Giulio & Tolga Ergün, A., 2013. "Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3169-3180.
    5. Mathias Manguzvane & John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba, 2019. "Modelling systemic risk in the South African banking sector using CoVaR," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 624-641, September.
    6. Varotto, Simone & Zhao, Lei, 2018. "Systemic risk and bank size," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 45-70.
    7. Wided Khiari & Salim Ben Sassi, 2019. "On Identifying the Systemically Important Tunisian Banks: An Empirical Approach Based on the △CoVaR Measures," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Bernal, Oscar & Gnabo, Jean-Yves & Guilmin, Grégory, 2016. "Economic policy uncertainty and risk spillovers in the Eurozone," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 24-45.
    9. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2015. "Systemic risk in European sovereign debt markets: A CoVaR-copula approach," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 214-244.
    10. Benjamin Miranda Tabak & Thiago Christiano Silva & Ahmet Sensoy, 2018. "Financial Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-2, April.
    11. Verma, Ramprasad & Ahmad, Wasim & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Bekiros, Stelios, 2019. "Analysing the systemic risk of Indian banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 103-108.
    12. Drakos, Anastassios A. & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2015. "Bank ownership, financial segments and the measurement of systemic risk: An application of CoVaR," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 127-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, Walmir & Kimura, Herbert & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim, 2017. "An analysis of the literature on systemic financial risk: A survey," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 91-114.
    2. Shimizu, Katsutoshi & Ly, Kim Cuong, 2017. "Were regulatory interventions effective in lowering systemic risk during the financial crisis in Japan?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 80-91.
    3. Usman, Muhammad & Umar, Zaghum & Choi, Sun-Yong & Teplova, Tamara, 2024. "Quantifying endogenous and exogenous shocks to financial sector systemic risk: A comparison of GFC and COVID-19," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 281-293.
    4. Zhu, Bangzhu & Huang, Liqing & Yuan, Lili & Ye, Shunxin & Wang, Ping, 2020. "Exploring the risk spillover effects between carbon market and electricity market: A bidimensional empirical mode decomposition based conditional value at risk approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 163-175.
    5. Xu, Qiuhua & Yan, Haoyang & Zhao, Tianyu, 2022. "Contagion effect of systemic risk among industry sectors in China’s stock market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Fenghua Wen & Kaiyan Weng & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Measuring the contribution of Chinese financial institutions to systemic risk: an extended asymmetric CoVaR approach," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 310-337, December.
    7. Morelli, David & Vioto, Davide, 2020. "Assessing the contribution of China’s financial sectors to systemic risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    8. Varotto, Simone & Zhao, Lei, 2018. "Systemic risk and bank size," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 45-70.
    9. Curcio, Domenico & Gianfrancesco, Igor & Vioto, Davide, 2023. "Climate change and financial systemic risk: Evidence from US banks and insurers," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Hossein Dastkhan, 2021. "Network‐based early warning system to predict financial crisis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 594-616, January.
    11. Yang, Hsin-Feng & Liu, Chih-Liang & Yeutien Chou, Ray, 2020. "Bank diversification and systemic risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 311-326.
    12. Cao, Yufei, 2022. "Extreme risk spillovers across financial markets under different crises," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Foglia, Matteo & Addi, Abdelhamid & Angelini, Eliana, 2022. "The Eurozone banking sector in the time of COVID-19: Measuring volatility connectedness," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Pham, Thach N. & Powell, Robert & Bannigidadmath, Deepa, 2021. "Systemically important banks in Asian emerging markets: Evidence from four systemic risk measures," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Xu, Qifa & Jin, Bei & Jiang, Cuixia, 2021. "Measuring systemic risk of the Chinese banking industry: A wavelet-based quantile regression approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    16. Fang, Libing & Sun, Boyang & Li, Huijing & Yu, Honghai, 2018. "Systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 190-206.
    17. Jian, Zhihong & Wu, Shuai & Zhu, Zhican, 2018. "Asymmetric extreme risk spillovers between the Chinese stock market and index futures market: An MV-CAViaR based intraday CoVaR approach," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 98-113.
    18. Aida Barkauskaite & Ausrine Lakstutiene & Justyna Witkowska, 2018. "Measurement of Systemic Risk in a Common European Union Risk-Based Deposit Insurance System: Formal Necessity or Value-Adding Process?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Rahman, Md Lutfur & Troster, Victor & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Yahya, Muhammad, 2022. "Systemic risk contribution of banks and non-bank financial institutions across frequencies: The Australian experience," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Curcio, Domenico & D’Amico, Simona & Gianfrancesco, Igor & Vioto, Davide, 2024. "Understanding the impact of the financial technology revolution on systemic risk: Evidence from US and EU diversified financials," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:180-:d:315629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.