IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i11p1857-d433571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Decision Approach with Probabilistic Linguistic Information for Test Case Prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • A. D. Shrivathsan

    (School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, TN, India)

  • R. Krishankumar

    (School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, TN, India)

  • Arunodaya Raj Mishra

    (Department of Mathematics, Government College, Jaitwara 485221, MP, India)

  • K. S. Ravichandran

    (School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, TN, India)

  • Samarjit Kar

    (Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713209, WB, India)

  • V. Badrinath

    (School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, TN, India)

Abstract

This paper focuses on an exciting and essential problem in software companies. The software life cycle includes testing software, which is often time-consuming, and is a critical phase in the software development process. To reduce time spent on testing and to maintain software quality, the idea of a systematic selection of test cases is needed. Attracted by the claim, researchers presented test case prioritization (TCP) by applying the concepts of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). However, the literature on TCP suffers from the following issues: (i) difficulty in properly handling uncertainty; (ii) systematic evaluation of criteria by understanding the hesitation of experts; and (iii) rational prioritization of test cases by considering the nature of criteria. Motivated by these issues, an integrated approach is put forward that could circumvent the problem in this paper. The main aim of this research is to develop a decision model with integrated methods for TCP. The core importance of the proposed model is to (i) provide a systematic/methodical decision on TCP with a reduction in testing time and cost; (ii) help software personnel choose an apt test case from the suite for testing software; (iii) reduce human bias by mitigating intervention of personnel in the decision process. To this end, probabilistic linguistic information (PLI) is adopted as the preference structure that could flexibly handle uncertainty by associating occurrence probability to each linguistic term. Furthermore, an attitude-based entropy measure is presented for criteria weight calculation, and finally, the EDAS ranking method is extended to PLI for TCP. An empirical study of TCP in a software company is presented to certify the integrated approach’s effectiveness. The strengths and weaknesses of the introduced approach are conferred by comparing it with the relevant methods.

Suggested Citation

  • A. D. Shrivathsan & R. Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & K. S. Ravichandran & Samarjit Kar & V. Badrinath, 2020. "An Integrated Decision Approach with Probabilistic Linguistic Information for Test Case Prioritization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:11:p:1857-:d:433571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/1857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/1857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huchang Liao & Xiaomei Mi & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 81-134, March.
    2. Wanying Xie & Zeshui Xu & Zhiliang Ren & Hai Wang, 2018. "Probabilistic Linguistic Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application on the Performance Assessment of Xiongan New Area," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1693-1724, November.
    3. Xiaolu Zhang & Xiaoming Xing, 2017. "Probabilistic Linguistic VIKOR Method to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huchang Liao & Xiaomei Mi & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 81-134, March.
    2. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Yayi Yuan & Zeshui Xu & Yixin Zhang, 2022. "The DEMATEL–COPRAS hybrid method under probabilistic linguistic environment and its application in Third Party Logistics provider selection," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    5. Zhenzhen Ma & Jianjun Zhu & Shitao Zhang, 2021. "Probabilistic-based expressions in behavioral multi-attribute decision making considering pre-evaluation," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 145-173, March.
    6. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Yong Qin, 2022. "Structure, trend and prospect of operational research: a scientific analysis for publications from 1952 to 2020 included in Web of Science database," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-672, December.
    7. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu & Xinxin Wang & Huchang Liao, 2021. "Managing consensus reaching process with self-confident double hierarchy linguistic preference relations in group decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-79, March.
    8. Shuailei Yuan & Aijun Liu & Zengxian Li & Yun Yang & Jing Liu & Yue Su, 2022. "Supplier Evaluation Considering Green Production Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Meng Zhao & Xinyuan Shen & Huchang Liao & Mingyao Cai, 2022. "Selecting products through text reviews: An MCDM method incorporating personalized heuristic judgments in the prospect theory," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 21-44, March.
    10. Qi Wang & Shuo Wang & Si Fu, 2023. "A Sustainable Iterative Product Design Method Based on Considering User Needs from Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao, 2021. "Learning judgment benchmarks of customers from online reviews," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(4), pages 1125-1157, December.
    13. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shanlin Yang, 2022. "A comparative analysis of probabilistic linguistic preference relations and distributed preference relations for decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 71-97, March.
    14. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2023. "Value-driven preference disaggregation analysis for uncertain preference information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Dan-Ping Li & Li Xie & Peng-Fei Cheng & Xiang-Hong Zhou & Cheng-Xun Fu, 2021. "Green Supplier Selection Under Cloud Manufacturing Environment: A Hybrid MCDM Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    16. Yongming Song, 2018. "Deriving the priority weights from probabilistic linguistic preference relation with unknown probabilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Jiahui Chai & Sidong Xian & Sichong Lu, 2021. "Z probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in multi-attribute group decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 529-566, December.
    18. Bahram Farhadinia, 2022. "An innovative unification process for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements and its application to decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 335-382, September.
    19. Xiangqian Feng & Xiaodong Pang & Lan Zhang, 2020. "On consistency and priority weights for interval probabilistic linguistic preference relations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 529-560, December.
    20. Yinfeng Du & Dun Liu, 2021. "A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 365-395, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:11:p:1857-:d:433571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.