IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i9p1299-d1382592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Design Optimization of Electric Machines with Isogeometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Theodor Komann

    (Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Dolivostraße 15, 64297 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Michael Wiesheu

    (Computational Electromagnetics Group, Technical University of Darmstadt, Schloßgartenstraße 8, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Stefan Ulbrich

    (Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Dolivostraße 15, 64297 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Sebastian Schöps

    (Computational Electromagnetics Group, Technical University of Darmstadt, Schloßgartenstraße 8, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

Abstract

In electric machine design, efficient methods for the optimization of the geometry and associated parameters are essential. Nowadays, it is necessary to address the uncertainty caused by manufacturing or material tolerances. This work presents a robust optimization strategy to address uncertainty in the design of a three-phase, six-pole permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM). The geometry is constructed in a two-dimensional framework within MATLAB ® , employing isogeometric analysis (IGA) to enable flexible shape optimization. The main contributions of this research are twofold. First, we integrate shape optimization with parameter optimization to enhance the performance of PMSM designs. Second, we use robust optimization, which creates a min–max problem, to ensure that the motor maintains its performance when facing uncertainties. To solve this bilevel problem, we work with the maximal value functions of the lower-level maximization problems and apply a version of Danskin’s theorem for the computation of generalized derivatives. Additionally, the adjoint method is employed to efficiently solve the lower-level problems with gradient-based optimization. The paper concludes by presenting numerical results showcasing the efficacy of the proposed robust optimization framework. The results indicate that the optimized PMSM designs not only perform competitively compared to their non-robust counterparts but also show resilience to operational and manufacturing uncertainties, making them attractive for industrial applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodor Komann & Michael Wiesheu & Stefan Ulbrich & Sebastian Schöps, 2024. "Robust Design Optimization of Electric Machines with Isogeometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:1299-:d:1382592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/9/1299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/9/1299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Omid Nohadani & Kwong Meng Teo, 2010. "Nonconvex Robust Optimization for Problems with Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 44-58, February.
    2. Y. Zhang, 2007. "General Robust-Optimization Formulation for Nonlinear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 111-124, January.
    3. Matthias Ehrgott, 2005. "Multicriteria Optimization," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-27659-3, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    2. Emilio Carrizosa & Frédéric Messine, 2021. "An interval branch and bound method for global Robust optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 507-522, July.
    3. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    4. Wu, Weitiao & Lin, Yue & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2022. "The multi-depot electric vehicle scheduling problem with power grid characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 322-347.
    5. Gabriele Eichfelder & Corinna Krüger & Anita Schöbel, 2017. "Decision uncertainty in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 485-510, October.
    6. Bogdana Stanojević & Milan Stanojević & Sorin Nădăban, 2021. "Reinstatement of the Extension Principle in Approaching Mathematical Programming with Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Stelios Rozakis & Athanasios Kampas, 2022. "An interactive multi-criteria approach to admit new members in international environmental agreements," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3461-3487, September.
    8. Manuel V. C. Vieira & Margarida Carvalho, 2023. "Lexicographic optimization for the multi-container loading problem with open dimensions for a shoe manufacturer," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 491-512, September.
    9. Danielle A. Ripsman & Thomas G. Purdie & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Houra Mahmoudzadeh, 2022. "Robust Direct Aperture Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2017-2038, July.
    10. Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório & Laura Cozzi Ribeiro & Mateus Alberto Dorna de Oliveira Ferreira & Joel Gomes Pereira Junior, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Yeudiel Lara Moreno & Carlos Ignacio Hernández Castellanos, 2024. "A Hierarchical Approach to a Tri-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem Considering an ESG Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Bennet Gebken & Sebastian Peitz, 2021. "Inverse multiobjective optimization: Inferring decision criteria from data," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 3-29, May.
    13. Fernando García-Castaño & Miguel Ángel Melguizo-Padial & G. Parzanese, 2023. "Sublinear scalarizations for proper and approximate proper efficient points in nonconvex vector optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(3), pages 367-382, June.
    14. Min Feng & Shengjie Li & Jie Wang, 2022. "On Tucker-Type Alternative Theorems and Necessary Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 480-503, November.
    15. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2019. "Numerical Method for Solving the Robust Continuous-Time Linear Programming Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-50, May.
    16. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben & Maddah, Bacel & Flamand, Tülay & Azar, Jimmy, 2024. "Store-Wide space planning balancing impulse and convenience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 211-226.
    17. Doğan, Ilgın & Lokman, Banu & Köksalan, Murat, 2022. "Representing the nondominated set in multi-objective mixed-integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 804-818.
    18. Brouer, Berit D. & Dirksen, Jakob & Pisinger, David & Plum, Christian E.M. & Vaaben, Bo, 2013. "The Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem (VSRP) – A MIP model for handling disruptions in liner shipping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 362-374.
    19. Lourdes Uribe & Johan M Bogoya & Andrés Vargas & Adriana Lara & Günter Rudolph & Oliver Schütze, 2020. "A Set Based Newton Method for the Averaged Hausdorff Distance for Multi-Objective Reference Set Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    20. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:1299-:d:1382592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.