IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i6p813-d1354489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Analytics-Driven Selection of Die Material in Multi-Material Co-Extrusion of Ti-Mg Alloys

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Fernández

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Álvaro Rodríguez-Prieto

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana María Camacho

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The selection of the most suitable material is one of the key decisions to be made during the design stage of a manufacturing process. Traditional approaches, such as Ashby maps based on material properties, are widely used in industry. However, in the production of multi-material components, the criteria for the selection can include antagonistic approaches. The aim of this work is to implement a methodology based on the results of process simulations for several materials and to classify them by applying an advanced data analytics method based on machine learning (ML)—in this case, the support vector regression (SVR) or multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology. Specifically, the multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR) was combined with entropy weighting methods. To achieve this, a finite element model (FEM) was built to evaluate the extrusion force and the die wear during the multi-material co-extrusion process of bimetallic Ti6Al4V-AZ31B billets. After applying SVR and VIKOR in combination with the entropy weighting methodology, a comparison was established based on material selection and the complexity of the methodology used. The results show that the material chosen in both methodologies is very similar, but the MCDM method is easier to implement because there is no need for evaluating the error of the prediction model, and the time required for data preprocessing is less than the time needed when applying SVR. This new methodology is proven to be effective as an alternative to traditional approaches and is aligned with the new trends in industry based on simulation and data analytics.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Fernández & Álvaro Rodríguez-Prieto & Ana María Camacho, 2024. "Data-Analytics-Driven Selection of Die Material in Multi-Material Co-Extrusion of Ti-Mg Alloys," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:813-:d:1354489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/6/813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/6/813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Rai & Manoj Kumar Tiwari & Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2021. "Machine learning in manufacturing and industry 4.0 applications," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(16), pages 4773-4778, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Jiuh‐Biing Sheu & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2023. "Can we work more safely and healthily with robot partners? A human‐friendly robot–human‐coordinated order fulfillment scheme," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 794-812, March.
    3. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.
    4. Yu, Aobo & Cai, Bolin & Wu, Qiujie & García, Miguel Martínez & Li, Jing & Chen, Xiangcheng, 2024. "Source-free domain adaptation method for fault diagnosis of rotation machinery under partial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Jackson, Ilya & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "A beautiful shock? Exploring the impact of pandemic shocks on the accuracy of AI forecasting in the beauty care industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Yu Yao & Quan Qian, 2024. "Dynamic Industrial Optimization: A Framework Integrates Online Machine Learning for Processing Parameters Design," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Tsan-Ming Choi & Alexandre Dolgui & Dmitry Ivanov & Erwin Pesch, 2022. "OR and analytics for digital, resilient, and sustainable manufacturing 4.0," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 1-6, March.
    8. Alisha Lakra & Shubhkirti Gupta & Ravi Ranjan & Sushanta Tripathy & Deepak Singhal, 2022. "The Significance of Machine Learning in the Manufacturing Sector: An ISM Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Zhu, Minghao & Liang, Chen & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2024. "The impact of intelligent manufacturing on labor productivity: An empirical analysis of Chinese listed manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Chauhan, Ruchi & Majumder, Arunava & Kumar, Varun, 2023. "The impact of adopting customization policy and sustainability for improving consumer service in a dual-channel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:813-:d:1354489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.