IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i23p3838-d1536757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Decisions of Quality and Goodwill in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Delay Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 73000, China)

  • Linzhong Liu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 73000, China)

  • Wen Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 73000, China)

Abstract

Improving product quality is an effective way for a company to gain goodwill as well as to increase sales. In this paper, the focus is on a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Considering the delayed effect of quality improvement on product quality, the differential equations on the levels of quality and goodwill as the state variables are established to explore the impact of delay time on members’ strategy inputs, supply chain profits and performance under decentralized and centralized decision models. Additionally, in this paper, how different profit maximization scenarios affect supply chain revenue under decentralized models is examined. The equilibrium solutions are obtained by numerical simulation. The results show that both quality improvement efforts and marketing efforts are decreasing functions of delay time, and the delay effect affects the motivation of supply chain members’ strategic inputs. Importantly, supply chain profit under centralized decision is not always higher than that under decentralized decision when the manufacturer’s concern degree and delay time are taken into account. The Rubinstein bargaining model is then used to optimize the profit distribution between the manufacturer and the retailer under centralized decision. In this paper, it is also identified that the longer the delay time, the lower the levels of quality and goodwill. The dual effect of delay effect and concern degree will exacerbate the negative impact on the levels of quality and goodwill.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Li & Linzhong Liu & Wen Li, 2024. "Dynamic Decisions of Quality and Goodwill in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Delay Effect," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3838-:d:1536757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lizhen Zhan & Hui Shu & Xideng Zhou & Xiaowei Lin, 2022. "A Quality Decision Model Considering the Delay Effects in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Bruce G. S. Hardie & Eric J. Johnson & Peter S. Fader, 1993. "Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 378-394.
    3. Ashwin Aravindakshan & Prasad A. Naik, 2015. "Understanding the Memory Effects in Pulsing Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 35-47, February.
    4. Petr Fiala, 2016. "Profit allocation games in supply chains," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 24(2), pages 267-281, June.
    5. F. Gozzi & C. Marinelli & S. Savin, 2009. "On Controlled Linear Diffusions with Delay in a Model of Optimal Advertising under Uncertainty with Memory Effects," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 291-321, August.
    6. Aust, Gerhard & Buscher, Udo, 2014. "Cooperative advertising models in supply chain management: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 1-14.
    7. Régis Chenavaz, 2017. "Dynamic quality policies with reference quality effects," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(32), pages 3156-3162, July.
    8. Reddy, Puduru V. & Wrzaczek, Stefan & Zaccour, Georges, 2016. "Quality effects in different advertising models - An impulse control approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 984-995.
    9. Zhang, Shichen & Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2022. "Demand forecast sharing for a dominant retailer with supplier encroachment and quality decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 39-50.
    10. Haoyu Liu & Shulin Liu, 2020. "Research on Advertising and Quality of Paid Apps, Considering the Effects of Reference Price and Goodwill," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Govindan, Kannan & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Jokar, Abbas, 2019. "An adjustable bi-level wholesale price contract for coordinating a supply chain under scenario-based stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 175-195.
    12. Yanyan He & Juan Zhang & Qinglong Gou & Gongbing Bi, 2018. "Supply chain decisions with reference quality effect under the O2O environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 273-292, September.
    13. Yan Zhang & Wen Zhang, 2023. "Optimal pricing and greening decisions in a supply chain when considering market segmentation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 93-130, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou Xideng & Xu Bing & Xie Fei & Li Yu, 2020. "Research on Quality Decisions and Coordination with Reference Effect in Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Ma, Deqing & Li, Kaifu & Hu, Jinsong & Wang, Xue, 2024. "How to leverage blockchain to react to consumer reference effects and develop a distribution strategy in online retailing?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu & Weihao Wang, 2021. "Differential game of product–service supply chain considering consumers’ reference effect and supply chain members’ reciprocity altruism in the online-to-offline mode," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 263-297, September.
    4. Minglin Jiang & Xiaowei Lin & Xideng Zhou & Hongfang Qiao, 2022. "Research on Supply Chain Quality Decision Model Considering Reference Effect and Competition under Different Decision-Making Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    6. Mesak, Hani I. & Bari, Abdullahel & Luehlfing, Michael S. & Han, Fei, 2015. "On modeling the advertising-operations interface under asymmetric competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 278-291.
    7. Huang, Zongsheng & Bai, Peijie, 2021. "Dynamic cooperative promotion in the presence of consumer reference effect with competing retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Deqing Ma & Xue Wang & Jinsong Hu, 2022. "Platform Selling Mode Selection Considering Consumer Reference Effect in Carbon Emission Reduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-43, December.
    9. Zhou, Yanju & Lai, Hongzhen & Chen, Xiaohong & Hu, Chunhua, 2025. "Protecting labor rights: Contract design and coordination between brand firms and suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(1), pages 69-84.
    10. Zhou, Chi & Yu, Jing & Qian, Yong, 2024. "Should live-streaming platforms nonexclusively promote brands from traditional retail platforms?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Chadwick J. Miller & Daniel C. Brannon & Jim Salas & Martha Troncoza, 2021. "Advertising, incentives, and the upsell: how advertising differentially moderates customer- vs. retailer-directed price incentives’ impact on consumers’ preferences for premium products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1043-1064, November.
    12. Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Zaccour, Georges, 2017. "Assessing the profitability of cooperative advertising programs in competing channels," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 142-158.
    13. William Lefebvre & Enzo Miller, 2021. "Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution," Working Papers hal-03145949, HAL.
    14. Vishal Gaur & Young-Hoon Park, 2007. "Asymmetric Consumer Learning and Inventory Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 227-240, February.
    15. Grund, Christian, 2011. "Job Preferences as Revealed by Employee Initiated Job Changes," IZA Discussion Papers 6127, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Eric Johnson & Simon Gaechter & Andreas Herrmann, 2006. "Exploring the Nature of Loss Aversion," Discussion Papers 2006-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    17. Carstensen, Laura L. & Reynolds, Megan E., 2023. "Age differences in preferences through the lens of socioemotional selectivity theory," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    18. Raj Sethuraman & V. Srinivasan & Doyle Kim, 1999. "Asymmetric and Neighborhood Cross-Price Effects: Some Empirical Generalizations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 23-41.
    19. Chenavaz, Régis & Paraschiv, Corina, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for inventories with reference price effects," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-16.
    20. Zongsheng Huang & Peijie Bai, 2024. "Dynamic Cooperative Promotion in the Presence of Private Brand Introduction and Retailer Myopic Behavior," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1131-1159, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3838-:d:1536757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.