IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i23p3754-d1532055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability Growth Method for Electromechanical Products Based on Organizational Reliability Capability Evaluation and Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyi Mu

    (College of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China
    College of Aerospace Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Jian Li

    (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Equipment Mechanism Design and Control, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
    College of Mechanical Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Xiaogang Zhang

    (Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Genbao Zhang

    (College of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China)

  • Jinyuan Li

    (College of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China)

  • Hao Wei

    (College of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China)

Abstract

The reliability growth of electromechanical products is a continuous process of addressing reliability defects, which is very important for manufacturing enterprises. At present, research on the reliability growth of electromechanical products mostly focuses on the reliability defects of the products themselves, ignoring the fact that manufacturing enterprises are the executors of product reliability related work. Improving the organizational reliability capability of manufacturing enterprises can enhance the reliability of electromechanical products. In order to understand the current situation of organizational reliability capability (ORC) in electromechanical product manufacturing enterprises and make improvements, this paper establishes an ORC evaluation indicator framework for electromechanical product manufacturing enterprises and evaluates it using the grey evaluation method. Firstly, an evaluation indicator framework for ORC is established based on enterprise research. Secondly, the ORC of electromechanical product manufacturing enterprises is evaluated by combining the three-parameter interval grey number and projection index function. Then, the evaluation results are analyzed from multiple perspectives to understand the current situation and shortcomings of ORC and guide its improvement. Finally, the evaluation indicator framework and method are explained through practical application in CNC machine tool manufacturing enterprises, and the effectiveness of the framework and method is demonstrated through the MTBF growth of CNC machine tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyi Mu & Jian Li & Xiaogang Zhang & Genbao Zhang & Jinyuan Li & Hao Wei, 2024. "Reliability Growth Method for Electromechanical Products Based on Organizational Reliability Capability Evaluation and Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3754-:d:1532055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liao, Ruoyu & He, Yihai & Zhang, Jishan & Zheng, Xin & Zhang, Anqi & Zhang, Weifang, 2023. "Reliability proactive control approach based on product key reliability characteristics in manufacturing process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Grudzień, Łukasz & Hamrol, Adam, 2016. "Information quality in design process documentation of quality management systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 599-606.
    3. Adrian Gill & Ireneusz Pielecha & Filip Szwajca, 2024. "A New Method of Failure Mode and Severity Effects Analysis for Hydrogen-Fueled Combustion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Nath, Rahul & Muhuri, Pranab K., 2024. "A novel evolutionary solution approach for many-objective reliability-redundancy allocation problem based on objective prioritization and constraint optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Zhang, Zixuan & Yang, Lin & Xu, Youwei & Zhu, Ran & Cao, Yining, 2023. "A novel reliability redundancy allocation problem formulation for complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chenwei & Wang, Ying & Zheng, Tao & Zhang, Kaifeng, 2024. "Complex network theory-based optimization for enhancing resilience of large-scale multi-energy System11The short version of the paper was presented at CUE2023. This paper is a substantial extension of," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    2. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Zhong, Yuanfu & Ren, Kezhou & Zhang, Yingchao, 2024. "Deep reinforcement learning-based resilience enhancement strategy of unmanned weapon system-of-systems under inevitable interferences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Davide Lanni & Enzo Galloni, 2024. "New Fuels and Advanced Combustion Modes for Innovative Internal Combustion Engines: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-6, December.
    4. Nath, Rahul & Muhuri, Pranab K., 2024. "A novel evolutionary solution approach for many-objective reliability-redundancy allocation problem based on objective prioritization and constraint optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3754-:d:1532055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.