IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i20p3176-d1496241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Production Rescheduling: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Holguin Jimenez

    (Université de Lorraine, LGIPM, F-57000 Metz, France)

  • Wajdi Trabelsi

    (ICN Business School, LGIPM, F-54000 Nancy, France)

  • Christophe Sauvey

    (Université de Lorraine, LGIPM, F-57000 Metz, France)

Abstract

Production rescheduling involves re-optimizing production schedules in response to disruptions that render the initial schedule inefficient or unfeasible. This process requires simultaneous consideration of multiple objectives to develop new schedules that are both efficient and stable. However, existing review papers have paid limited attention to the multi-objective optimization techniques employed in this context. To address this gap, this paper presents a systematic literature review on multi-objective production rescheduling, examining diverse shop-floor environments. Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 291 papers were identified. From this pool, studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and analyzed to provide a comprehensive overview of the problems tackled, dynamic events managed, objectives considered, and optimization approaches discussed in the literature. This review highlights the primary multi-objective optimization methods used in relation to rescheduling strategies and the dynamic disruptive events studied. Findings reveal a growing interest in this research area, with “a priori” and “a posteriori” optimization methods being the most commonly implemented and a notable rise in the use of the latter. Hybridized algorithms have shown superior performance compared to standalone algorithms by leveraging combined strengths and mitigating individual weaknesses. Additionally, “interactive” and “Pareto pruning” methods, as well as the consideration of human factors in flexible production systems, remain under-explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Holguin Jimenez & Wajdi Trabelsi & Christophe Sauvey, 2024. "Multi-Objective Production Rescheduling: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3176-:d:1496241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suresh, V. & Chaudhuri, Dipak, 1993. "Dynamic scheduling--a survey of research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 53-63, August.
    2. Pablo Valledor & Alberto Gomez & Paolo Priore & Javier Puente, 2018. "Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(19), pages 6363-6377, October.
    3. Neufeld, Janis S. & Schulz, Sven & Buscher, Udo, 2023. "A systematic review of multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 1-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarper, H. & Henry, M. C., 1996. "Combinatorial evaluation of six dispatching rules in a dynamic two-machine flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 73-81, February.
    2. Xinyu Sun & Xin-Na Geng & Tao Liu, 2020. "Due-window assignment scheduling in the proportionate flow shop setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 113-131, September.
    3. Khalil Tliba & Thierno M. L. Diallo & Olivia Penas & Romdhane Ben Khalifa & Noureddine Ben Yahia & Jean-Yves Choley, 2023. "Digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling of a hybrid flow shop," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2281-2306, June.
    4. Roman Buil & Jesica de Armas & Daniel Riera & Sandra Orozco, 2021. "Optimization of the Real-Time Response to Roadside Incidents through Heuristic and Linear Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Adan, Ivo J.B.F., 2024. "Enhancing stability and robustness in online machine shop scheduling: A multi-agent system and negotiation-based approach for handling machine downtime in industry 4.0," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 569-583.
    6. Cowling, Peter & Johansson, Marcus, 2002. "Using real time information for effective dynamic scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 230-244, June.
    7. Máté Hegyháti & Krisztián Attila Bakon & Tibor Holczinger, 2023. "Optimization with uncertainties: a scheduling example," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1239-1263, December.
    8. Bowen Pang & Xiaolei Xie & Feng Ju & James Pipe, 2022. "A dynamic sequential decision-making model on MRI real-time scheduling with simulation-based optimization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 426-440, September.
    9. Ntuen, Celestine A. & Park, Eui H., 1995. "An experiment in scheduling and planning of non-structured jobs: Lessons learned from artificial intelligence and operational research toolbox," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 96-115, July.
    10. Thom J. Hodgson & Denis Cormier & Alexander J. Weintraub & Andrew Zozom, 1998. "Note. Satisfying Due Dates in Large Job Shops," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1442-1446, October.
    11. Tang, Lixin & Liu, Jiyin & Rong, Aiying & Yang, Zihou, 2001. "A review of planning and scheduling systems and methods for integrated steel production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Xingong Zhang & Win-Chin Lin & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "Rescheduling problems with allowing for the unexpected new jobs arrival," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 630-645, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3176-:d:1496241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.