IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i19p3154-d1494796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Games between a Brand Manufacturer and an Internet Celebrity Regarding Fairness Concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Li

    (School of Business, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Weidong Huang

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of social media and live-streaming technology, live-stream selling has become integral to the digital economy. Using differential game theory, this paper examines how fairness concerns impact the profits of internet celebrities and brand manufacturers under the “pure commission” model. We analyzed no fairness concern, gap fairness concern, and self-due fairness concern models, to investigate the optimal decisions and corresponding profits for an internet celebrity and a brand manufacturer. The results show that the internet celebrity earned the highest profits with low commission rates under the self-due fairness concern model, whereas higher commission rates yielded higher profits for the internet celebrity under the gap fairness concern model. Simultaneously, fairness concerns significantly affected the cooperation stability and long-term benefits, motivating the internet celebrity to maintain efficient collaborations with the brand manufacturer. Furthermore, the self-due fairness concern model was more practical than the gap fairness concern model.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Li & Weidong Huang, 2024. "Differential Games between a Brand Manufacturer and an Internet Celebrity Regarding Fairness Concerns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:3154-:d:1494796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/3154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/3154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye, Fei & Ji, Li & Ning, Yu & Li, Yina, 2024. "Influencer selection and strategic analysis for live streaming selling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan, 2013. "Dynamic conformance and design quality in a supply chain: an assessment of contracts’ coordinating power," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 137-166, December.
    3. Linye Ma & Shuqing Gao & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2022. "How to Use Live Streaming to Improve Consumer Purchase Intentions: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Cui, Xueqing & Li, Yongjian & Li, Xiang & Fang, Shulin, 2023. "Livestream e-commerce in a platform supply chain: A product-fit uncertainty reduction perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Ji, Guojun & Fu, Tianyu & Li, Shuhao, 2023. "Optimal selling format considering price discount strategy in live-streaming commerce," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 529-544.
    6. Yehuda Kotowitz & Frank Mathewson, 1979. "Advertising, Consumer Information, and Product Quality," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(2), pages 566-588, Autumn.
    7. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    8. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Chi & Yu, Jing & Qian, Yong, 2024. "Should live-streaming platforms nonexclusively promote brands from traditional retail platforms?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Yang, Wenting & Govindan, Kannan & Zhang, Jiantong, 2023. "Spillover effects of live streaming selling in a dual-channel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. L. Lambertini & R. Orsini, 2014. "Process Innovation and Product Quality Improvement in a Dynamic Monopoly," Working Papers wp926, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    4. Luca Lambertini & Raimondello Orsini, 2015. "Quality Improvement and Process Innovation in Monopoly: A Dynamic Analysis," Working Paper series 15-12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    5. Xu, Xiaoping & Wang, Yuting & Cheng, T.C.E. & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2024. "Should live broadcasting platforms adopt artificial intelligence? A sales effort perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 979-999.
    6. Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Feichtinger, Gustav & Grass, Dieter & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M. & Seidl, Andrea, 2017. "Interaction of pricing, advertising and experience quality: A dynamic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 877-885.
    7. Ye, Fei & Ji, Li & Ning, Yu & Li, Yina, 2024. "Influencer selection and strategic analysis for live streaming selling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "A survey of dynamic models of product quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 991-1007.
    9. Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger & Dieter Grass & Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort, 2016. "Advertising and Quality-Dependent Word-of-Mouth in a Contagion Sales Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 323-342, July.
    10. Xiaogang Ma & Chunyu Bao & Jizi Li & Wandong Lou, 2022. "The impact of dual fairness concerns on bargaining game and its dynamic system stability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 357-382, November.
    11. Hui Zhang & Kai Luo & Guanqun Ni, 2022. "The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1106-1124, July.
    12. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    15. Hua Pan & Huimin Zhu & Minmin Teng, 2023. "Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Fan, Jianchang & Ni, Debing & Fang, Xiang, 2020. "Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 514-537.
    17. Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Aliasghar Abbasi Kamardi & Moein Beheshti & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Luis Rocha-Lona, 2022. "Analysing supply chain coordination mechanisms dealing with repurposing challenges during Covid-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: a multi-layer decision making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1341-1360, December.
    18. Shuchen Ni & Chun Feng & Handan Gou, 2023. "Nash-Bargaining Fairness Concerns under Push and Pull Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Yingxiao Li & Jianheng Zhou, 2023. "Modeling the relationship between fairness concern and customer loyalty in dual distribution channel," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Salvatore Piccolo & Piero Tedeschi & Giovanni Ursino, 2018. "Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1291-1310, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:3154-:d:1494796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.