IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i18p2955-d1483596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric Test for Logistic Regression with Application to Italian Enterprises’ Propensity for Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Bonnini

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Michela Borghesi

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

Abstract

In this work, a nonparametric method is proposed to jointly test the significance of the regression coefficient estimates in a logistic regression model and identify which explanatory variables are effective in predicting the binary response. The motivating example is related to the factors affecting the propensity of Italian Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to innovate. The explanatory variables of the model represent firms’ characteristics, such as size and age, and the possible effect of the sector of economic activity is taken into account by including a set of binary variables as control factors. The dependent variable indicates whether a company, in the period under study, introduced at least one product or process innovation. Therefore, it is also dichotomous, and the logistic regression model is appropriate for representing the relationship between explanatory variables and dependent variable. Specifically, the logit transformation of the firm’s propensity to innovate, i.e., the probability that a company randomly chosen from the population of Italian SMEs has introduced an innovation or, equivalently, the proportion of innovative companies among the Italian SMEs, is expressed as a linear function of the predictors (explanatory and control variables). The proposed test is based on the permutation approach and satisfies important statistical properties, proved in a simulation study. The test is more flexible and robust than the classic parametric approach, and is preferable to typical stepwise regression procedures for the selection of a parsimonious and effective model.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Bonnini & Michela Borghesi, 2024. "Nonparametric Test for Logistic Regression with Application to Italian Enterprises’ Propensity for Innovation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:18:p:2955-:d:1483596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/18/2955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/18/2955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter H. Westfall, 2014. "Kurtosis as Peakedness, 1905-2014. R.I.P," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 191-195, April.
    2. Chenli Yin & Maria Paz Salmador & Dan Li & M. Begoña Lloria, 2022. "Green entrepreneurship and SME performance: the moderating effect of firm age," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 255-275, March.
    3. Li, Guangqin & Xue, Qing & Qin, Jiahong, 2022. "Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Moon, Jin-Young & Park, Youngseok & Na, Seung Kwon & Lee, Sunghee & Kim, Eunmi, 2022. "Accelerating Transitions towards a Circular Economy and Policy Implications for Korea," World Economy Brief 22-33, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Shunbin Zhong & Huafu Shen & Ziheng Niu & Yang Yu & Lin Pan & Yaojun Fan & Atif Jahanger, 2022. "Moving towards Environmental Sustainability: Can Digital Economy Reduce Environmental Degradation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Jani Saastamoinen & Hanna Savolainen, 2021. "Does a leopard change its spots? Auditors and lawyers as valuation experts for minority shareholders in the judicial appraisal of private firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 613-636, March.
    5. Zhao, Xing & Guo, Yifan & Feng, Tianchu, 2023. "Towards green recovery: Natural resources utilization efficiency under the impact of environmental information disclosure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Qin, Shuai & Li, Yaya, 2022. "Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Shige Makino & Christine M. Chan, 2017. "Skew and heavy-tail effects on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1721-1740, August.
    9. Huang, Hongyun & Mbanyele, William & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Wang, Yuzhang, 2022. "Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Cai Li & Majid Murad & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf, 2023. "The Influence of Women’s Green Entrepreneurial Intention on Green Entrepreneurial Behavior through University and Social Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Tian, Jinfang & Sun, Siyang & Cao, Wei & Bu, Di & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Make every dollar count: The impact of green credit regulation on corporate green investment efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Papadopoulos, Alecos & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2021. "Type II failure and specification testing in the Stochastic Frontier Model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 990-1001.
    13. Valery Chistov & Nekane Aramburu & María Eugenia Fabra Florit & Iñaki Peña‐Legazkue & Pauline Weritz, 2023. "Sustainability orientation and firm growth as ventures mature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5314-5331, December.
    14. Hui Hou & Yuanyuan Wang & Minglang Zhang, 2024. "Impact of environmental information disclosure on green finance development: empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20279-20309, August.
    15. Laura Broccardo & Elisa Truant & Lèo‐Paul Dana, 2023. "The sustainability orientation in the wine industry: An analysis based on age as a driver," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1300-1313, May.
    16. Zhang, Dongyang, 2024. "The pathway to curb greenwashing in sustainable growth: The role of artificial intelligence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Cong Zhang & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "What Drives Sustainable Development of Enterprises? Focusing on ESG Management and Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Lu, Zhiqiang & Li, Hongyu, 2023. "Does environmental information disclosure affect green innovation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-59.
    19. A. H. Nzokem, 2023. "Bitcoin versus S&P 500 Index: Return and Risk Analysis," Papers 2310.02436, arXiv.org.
    20. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Kao, Ya-Ling & Tang, Jia-Wei, 2023. "Key factors influencing mass willingness to use CESPs under green concept: ECOCO smart recyclers as a case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:18:p:2955-:d:1483596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.