IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i14p2187-d1433797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling Models of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment under Market-Driven Deposit-Refund System: A Stackelberg Game Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Liu

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China)

  • Weihua Liu

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China)

  • Chunsheng Li

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China)

Abstract

Recycling waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) has garnered considerable societal attention. To incentivize WEEE recycling within a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), a deposit-refund system (DRS) has been implemented. This study delves into the implications of a market-driven DRS on WEEE recycling under different recycling models. A Stackelberg game analysis is employed, where an electronics manufacturer (leader) has sufficient channel power over an electronics retailer and a third-party recycler (followers). The results indicate that the market-driven DRS significantly incentivizes consumer recycling efforts, ultimately elevating the economic efficiency of the supply chain. When the electronics manufacturer assumes responsibility for WEEE recycling, it streamlines the recycling process, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and profitability. Conversely, when the electronics retailer handles WEEE recycling, it reduces retail prices and simplifies the recycling process, positively influencing consumer purchasing behavior. However, when a third-party recycler undertakes WEEE recycling, the recycling volume tends to be minimal, resulting in the lowest level of supply chain profits. This paper provides theoretical and practical implications for improving the recycling effectiveness and operational efficiency of the CLSC.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Liu & Weihua Liu & Chunsheng Li, 2024. "Recycling Models of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment under Market-Driven Deposit-Refund System: A Stackelberg Game Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2187-:d:1433797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 155-166.
    2. Fan, Xiaojun & Guo, Xin & Wang, Shanshan, 2022. "Optimal collection delegation strategies in a retail-/dual-channel supply chain with trade-in programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 633-649.
    3. Zhang, Qi & Tang, Yanyan & Bunn, Derek & Li, Hailong & Li, Yaoming, 2021. "Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Kangye Tan & Yihui Tian & Fang Xu & Chunsheng Li, 2023. "Research on Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling for Power Battery Reverse Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Fang, Lei & Li, Yanlin & Govindan, Kannan, 2024. "Entry mode selection for a new entrant of the electric vehicle automaker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 270-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Rong & Wang, Nengmin & Jiang, Bin & He, Qidong, 2023. "Within-brand or cross-brand: The trade-in option under consumer switching costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Qiyao Liu & Xiaodong Zhu, 2024. "Incentive strategies for retired power battery closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 19013-19050, July.
    3. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    6. Nebojša Brkljač & Milan Delić & Marko Orošnjak & Nenad Medić & Slavko Rakić & Ljiljana Popović, 2024. "Interdependent Influences of Reverse Logistics Implementation Barriers in the Conditions of an Emerging Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Wang, Junbin & Zhang, Ting & Fan, Xiaojun, 2020. "Reverse channel design with a dominant retailer and upstream competition in emerging markets: Retailer- or manufacturer- collection?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Shen, Liang & Jin, Mingzhou, 2022. "Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Mohammad Reza Gholamian & Mahdi Ebrahimzadeh-Afruzi, 2021. "Credit and discount incentive options for two-level supply chain coordination, under uncertain price-dependent demand," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2283-2307, December.
    10. Sumon Sarkar & Bibhas C. Giri, 2022. "Safety stock management in a supply chain model with waiting time and price discount dependent backlogging rate in stochastic environment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 917-946, April.
    11. Ming Zhang & Jianjun Zhu & Ponnambalam Kumaraswamy & Hehua Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Effects of Problem Size and the Problem Proposing Mechanism on the Problem Processing Mechanism in a New Main Manufacturer–Supplier Collaborative System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Weisheng Deng, 2019. "Does Remanufacturing Always Benefit the Manufacturer and Hurt the Supplier?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Xue Wang & Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2022. "Recycling Model Selection for Electronic Products Considering Platform Power and Blockchain Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-44, May.
    14. Tian, Jiaqiang & Fan, Yuan & Pan, Tianhong & Zhang, Xu & Yin, Jianning & Zhang, Qingping, 2024. "A critical review on inconsistency mechanism, evaluation methods and improvement measures for lithium-ion battery energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    15. Guohao Li & Tao Wang, 2022. "Long-Term Leases vs. One-Off Purchases: Game Analysis on Battery Swapping Mode Considering Cascade Utilization and Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Yang, Lei & Hu, Yijuan & Huang, Lijuan, 2020. "Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 480-496.
    17. Tianle Tian & Chuiyong Zheng & Liguo Yang & Xiaochun Luo & Lin Lu, 2022. "Optimal Recycling Channel Selection of Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Xuemei Zhang & Haodong Zheng & Tao Hang & Qiang Meng, 2024. "How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Zhu, Lijing & Wang, Jingzhou & Farnoosh, Arash & Pan, Xunzhang, 2022. "A game-theory analysis of electric vehicle adoption in Beijing under license plate control policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    20. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Boyu & Li, Yan & Ni, Ruiyan & Wang, Yi, 2023. "What influences residents’ intention to participate in the electric vehicle battery recycling? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2187-:d:1433797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.