IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6296-d1441095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemei Zhang

    (Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Logistics Planning and Modern Logistics Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Haodong Zheng

    (Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Tao Hang

    (Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Qiang Meng

    (Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Logistics Planning and Modern Logistics Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

Abstract

Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemei Zhang & Haodong Zheng & Tao Hang & Qiang Meng, 2024. "How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-34, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6296-:d:1441095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chen, Yue, 2021. "Circular supply chain management with large scale group decision making in the big data era: The macro-micro model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Wang, Nengmin & He, Qidong & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 246-258.
    3. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    4. Fan, Xiaojun & Guo, Xin & Wang, Shanshan, 2022. "Optimal collection delegation strategies in a retail-/dual-channel supply chain with trade-in programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 633-649.
    5. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    6. Hong, Xianpei & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Wang, Wenjuan, 2015. "Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 12-22.
    7. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    8. Huang, Min & Song, Min & Lee, Loo Hay & Ching, Wai Ki, 2013. "Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 510-520.
    9. Köhler, Susanne & Bager, Simon & Pizzol, Massimo, 2022. "Sustainability standards and blockchain in agro-food supply chains: Synergies and conflicts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    11. Niu, Baozhuang & Dong, Jian & Liu, Yaoqi, 2021. "Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Matsui, Kenji, 2023. "Dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain design of recycling platforms under acquisition price competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    14. Ahmed Saber Moussa & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2023. "Does Capital Expenditure Matter for ESG Disclosure? A UK Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yongyi & Zhang, Yulin & Wahab, M.I.M. & Goh, Mark, 2023. "Channel leadership and performance for a closed-loop supply chain considering competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    3. Liu, Chang-Yi & Wang, Hui & Tang, Juan & Chang, Ching-Ter & Liu, Zhi, 2021. "Optimal recovery model in a used batteries closed-loop supply chain considering uncertain residual capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    5. Yang, Lei & Hu, Yijuan & Huang, Lijuan, 2020. "Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 480-496.
    6. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    8. Lin Zhao & Zongyu Mu, 2021. "Channel Strategies for the Two-Period Closed-Loop Supply Chain with E-Commerce," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-33, June.
    9. Matsui, Kenji, 2022. "Optimal timing of acquisition price announcement for used products in a dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 615-632.
    10. Pietro Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2019. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    11. Yong Liu & Qian-qian Shi & Qian Xu, 2019. "Alliance Decision of Supply Chain Considering Product Greenness and Recycling Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    13. He, Peng & He, Yong & Xu, Henry, 2019. "Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 108-123.
    14. Wang, Yong & Jiang, Qiong & Guan, Xu & Guan, Xiangyang, 2023. "Recycling channel design and coordination in a reverse supply chain with customer green preference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Matsui, Kenji, 2023. "Dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain design of recycling platforms under acquisition price competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Suvadarshini, Pinakhi & Biswas, Indranil & Srivastava, Samir K., 2023. "Impact of reverse channel competition, individual rationality, and information asymmetry on multi-channel closed-loop supply chain design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Xiuqi Jiang & Yini Zheng, 2023. "Pricing decisions and remanufacturing strategies considering consumer recycling behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 755-792, March.
    18. Linan Zhou & Gengui Zhou & Hangying Li & Jian Cao, 2023. "Channel Selection of Closed-Loop Supply Chain for Scrapped Agricultural Machines Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    19. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 155-166.
    20. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6296-:d:1441095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.