IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i12p2611-d1166032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of Healthcare Supply Chain in Industry 4.0 with Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Sine-Trigonometric Aggregation Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Anam Habib

    (Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan)

  • Zareen A. Khan

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Riaz

    (Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan)

  • Dragan Marinkovic

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nis, 18000 Nis, Serbia
    Department of Structural Analysis, Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The concept of linear Diophantine fuzzy set (LDFS) theory with its control parameters is a strong model for machine learning and data-driven multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The sine-trigonometric function (STF) has two significant features, periodicity and symmetry about the origin that are very useful tools for information analysis. Keeping in view the characteristics of both STF and LDFS theory, this article introduces the sine-trigonometric operations for linear Diophantine fuzzy numbers (LDFNs). These operational laws lay a foundation for developing new linear Diophantine fuzzy sine-trigonometric aggregation operators (LDFSTAOs). The integration of Industry 4.0 technology into healthcare has the potential to revolutionize patient care. One of the most challenging tasks is the selection of efficient suppliers for the healthcare supply chain (HSC). The traditional suppliers are not efficient in accordance with Industry 4.0, with particular uncertainties. A new MCDM framework is presented based on LDFSTAOs to examine the HSC performance in industry 4.0. A credibility test, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are performed to express the novelty, reliability, and efficiency of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Anam Habib & Zareen A. Khan & Muhammad Riaz & Dragan Marinkovic, 2023. "Performance Evaluation of Healthcare Supply Chain in Industry 4.0 with Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Sine-Trigonometric Aggregation Operations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:2611-:d:1166032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/12/2611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/12/2611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting He & Guiwu Wei & Jianping Lu & Cun Wei & Rui Lin, 2019. "Pythagorean 2-Tuple Linguistic Taxonomy Method for Supplier Selection in Medical Instrument Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Hui Gao & Linggang Ran & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei & Jiang Wu, 2020. "VIKOR Method for MAGDM Based on Q-Rung Interval-Valued Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Its Application to Supplier Selection of Medical Consumption Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Aiyared Iampan & Gustavo Santos García & Muhammad Riaz & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Ronnason Chinram & Basil Papadopoulos, 2021. "Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Einstein Aggregation Operators for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-31, July.
    4. Zeeshan Ali & Tahir Mahmood & Gustavo Santos-García, 2021. "Heronian Mean Operators Based on Novel Complex Linear Diophantine Uncertain Linguistic Variables and Their Applications in Multi-Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-37, October.
    5. Wang, Xiaoting & Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, 2008. "Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 45-63, February.
    6. Muhammad Riaz & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Weiwei Wang & Dragan Pamucar, 2022. "Interval-Valued Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Frank Aggregation Operators with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Mahyar Kamali Saraji & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2021. "Fermatean Fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS Method for Evaluating the Challenges to Industry 4.0 Adoption for a Sustainable Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibtesam Alshammari & Mani Parimala & Cenap Ozel & Muhammad Riaz & Rania Kammoun, 2022. "New MCDM Algorithms with Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Soft TOPSIS, VIKOR and Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Liangping Wu & Guiwu Wei & Jiang Wu & Cun Wei, 2020. "Some Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Heronian Mean Operators and their Application for Evaluating the Ecological Value of Forest Ecological Tourism Demonstration Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-31, January.
    3. Jianping Lu & Tingting He & Guiwu Wei & Jiang Wu & Cun Wei, 2020. "Cumulative Prospect Theory: Performance Evaluation of Government Purchases of Home-Based Elderly-Care Services Using the Pythagorean 2-tuple Linguistic TODIM Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Zaoli Yang & Xin Li & Harish Garg & Meng Qi, 2020. "Decision Support Algorithm for Selecting an Antivirus Mask over COVID-19 Pandemic under Spherical Normal Fuzzy Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    6. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    7. Lupo, Toni, 2015. "Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 249-259.
    8. Michailidou, Alexandra V. & Vlachokostas, Christos & Moussiopoulos, Νicolas, 2016. "Interactions between climate change and the tourism sector: Multiple-criteria decision analysis to assess mitigation and adaptation options in tourism areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Roy, B. & Figueira, J.R. & Almeida-Dias, J., 2014. "Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 9-20.
    10. Adnan Veysel Ertemel & Akin Menekse & Hatice Camgoz Akdag, 2023. "Smartphone Addiction Assessment Using Pythagorean Fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Saraji, Mahyar Kamali & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Evaluating the circular supply chain adoption in manufacturing sectors: A picture fuzzy approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    13. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Wang, Yi & Deveci, Muhammet & Moslem, Sarbast & Coffman, D'Maris, 2024. "Unveiling the implementation barriers to the digital transformation in the energy sector using the Fermatean cubic fuzzy method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    14. Blanca Ceballos & David A. Pelta & María T. Lamata, 2018. "Rank Reversal and the VIKOR Method: An Empirical Evaluation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 513-525, March.
    15. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.
    16. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    17. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    18. Mercè Sala-Rios & Teresa Torres-Solé & Mariona Farré-Perdiguer, 0. "Can a Multi-Criteria Methodology Fit with Non-Profit Institutions’ Decision-Making? An Application in a Spanish Non-Profit Association," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    19. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo & Edgar Santoyo & Esther O. García-Mandujano & Holkan Vázquez-Sánchez, 2023. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-30, July.
    20. Tavares, L. Valadares, 2012. "An acyclic outranking model to support group decision making within organizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 782-790.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:2611-:d:1166032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.