IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i11p2415-d1153691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TRX Cryptocurrency Profit and Transaction Success Rate Prediction Using Whale Optimization-Based Ensemble Learning Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Amogh Shukla

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Tapan Kumar Das

    (School of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Sanjiban Sekhar Roy

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India)

Abstract

TRON is a decentralized digital platform that provides a reliable way to transact in cryptocurrencies within a decentralized ecosystem. Thanks to its success, TRON’s native token, TRX, has been widely adopted by a large audience. To facilitate easy management of digital assets with TRON Wallet, users can securely store and manage their digital assets with ease. Our goal is first to develop a methodology to predict the future price using regression and then move on to build an effective classifier to predict whether a profit or loss is made the next day and then make a prediction of the transaction success rate. Our framework is capable of predicting whether there will be a profit in the future based on price prediction and forecasting results using regressors such as XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost with R 2 values of 0.9820, 0.9825 and 0.9858, respectively. In this work, an ensemble-based stacking classifier with the Whale optimization approach has been proposed which achieves the highest accuracy of 89.05 percent to predict if there will be a profit or loss the next day and an accuracy of 98.88 percent of TRX transaction success rate prediction which is higher than accuracies obtained by standard machine learning models. An effective framework will be useful for better decision-making and management of risks in a cryptocurrency.

Suggested Citation

  • Amogh Shukla & Tapan Kumar Das & Sanjiban Sekhar Roy, 2023. "TRX Cryptocurrency Profit and Transaction Success Rate Prediction Using Whale Optimization-Based Ensemble Learning Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2415-:d:1153691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eddelbuettel, Dirk & Stokely, Murray & Ooms, Jeroen, 2016. "RProtoBuf: Efficient Cross-Language Data Serialization in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i02).
    2. Tomáš Šťastný & Jiří Koudelka & Diana Bílková & Luboš Marek, 2022. "Clustering and Modelling of the Top 30 Cryptocurrency Prices Using Dynamic Time Warping and Machine Learning Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Jennifer J. Xu, 2016. "Are blockchains immune to all malicious attacks?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Majed Abdullah Alrowaily & Mansoor Alghamdi & Ibrahim Alkhazi & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Musab Mutasim Saeed Arbab & Charles Z. Liu, 2023. "Modeling and Analysis of Proof-Based Strategies for Distributed Consensus in Blockchain-Based Peer-to-Peer Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Yang, Ming-Yuan & Wu, Zhen-Guo & Wu, Xin, 2022. "An empirical study of risk diffusion in the cryptocurrency market based on the network analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Ozkan Haykir & Ibrahim Yagli, 2022. "Speculative bubbles and herding in cryptocurrencies," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, December.
    7. Antoon Spithoven, 2019. "Theory and Reality of Cryptocurrency Governance," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 385-393, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaheer Allam, 2018. "On Smart Contracts And Organisational Performance: A Review Of Smart Contracts Through The Blockchain Technology," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 22, pages 137-156, December.
    2. Huru Hasanova & Ui‐jun Baek & Mu‐gon Shin & Kyunghee Cho & Myung‐Sup Kim, 2019. "A survey on blockchain cybersecurity vulnerabilities and possible countermeasures," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), March.
    3. Khaled A. M. Ahmed & Sabry F. Saraya & John F. Wanis & Amr M. T. Ali-Eldin, 2023. "A Blockchain Self-Sovereign Identity for Open Banking Secured by the Customer’s Banking Cards," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Assaf, Ata & Demir, Ender & Ersan, Oguz, 2024. "Detecting and date-stamping bubbles in fan tokens," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 98-113.
    5. Yang, Ming-Yuan & Wu, Zhen-Guo & Wu, Xin & Li, Sai-Ping, 2024. "Influential risk spreaders and systemic risk in Chinese financial networks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Walid Mensi & Mariya Gubareva & Hee-Un Ko & Xuan Vinh Vo & Sang Hoon Kang, 2023. "Tail spillover effects between cryptocurrencies and uncertainty in the gold, oil, and stock markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Riccardo Blasis & Luca Galati & Alexander Webb & Robert I. Webb, 2023. "Intelligent design: stablecoins (in)stability and collateral during market turbulence," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Emilio Abad-Segura & Alfonso Infante-Moro & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Eloy López-Meneses, 2021. "Blockchain Technology for Secure Accounting Management: Research Trends Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Hackius, Niels & Petersen, Moritz, 2017. "Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: Trick or treat?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg Inter, volume 23, pages 3-18, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    10. Zhiqi Feng & Yongli Li & Xiaochen Ma, 2023. "Blockchain-oriented approach for detecting cyber-attack transactions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-38, December.
    11. Cheraghali, Hamid & Molnár, Peter & Storsveen, Mattis & Veliqi, Florent, 2024. "The impact of cryptocurrency-related cyberattacks on return, volatility, and trading volume of cryptocurrencies and traditional financial assets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    12. Sahebi, Iman Ghasemian & Masoomi, Behzad & Ghorbani, Shahryar, 2020. "Expert oriented approach for analyzing the blockchain adoption barriers in humanitarian supply chain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    14. Kyungmoo Heo & Sangyoon Yi, 2023. "(De)centralization in the governance of blockchain systems: cryptocurrency cases," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 59-82, September.
    15. Evans, Olaniyi, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and the Financial Market: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 99212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Michael Cary, 2024. "Herding and investor sentiment after the cryptocurrency crash: evidence from Twitter and natural language processing," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. WRÓBLEWSKI Wojciech & WIŚNIEWSKI Michał, 2024. "The Concept of a Method for Predicting the Cascade Effect Under Conditions of Hybrid Warfare," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 233-246.
    18. Kaihua Qin & Liyi Zhou & Yaroslav Afonin & Ludovico Lazzaretti & Arthur Gervais, 2021. "CeFi vs. DeFi -- Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Finance," Papers 2106.08157, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    19. Zhou, Fan, 2024. "Cryptocurrency: A new player or a new crisis in financial markets? —— Evolutionary analysis of association and risk spillover based on network science," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 648(C).
    20. Dulisse, Brandon Christopher & Connealy, Nathan & Logan, Matthew William, 2024. "“Get rich quick,” scheme or script? The effect of cryptoculture on the susceptibility of fraud victimization among cryptocurrency purchasers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2415-:d:1153691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.