IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i7p1174-d786739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics Modeling of Industrial Robotic Manipulators: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Synthetic Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sandi Baressi Šegota

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Nikola Anđelić

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Mario Šercer

    (Development and Educational Centre for the Metal Industry—Metal Centre Čakovec, Bana Josipa Jelačića 22 D, 40000 Čakovec, Croatia)

  • Hrvoje Meštrić

    (Ministry of Science and Education, Donje Svetice 38, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Obtaining a dynamic model of the robotic manipulator is a complex task. With the growing application of machine learning (ML) approaches in modern robotics, a question arises of using ML for dynamic modeling. Still, due to the large amounts of data necessary for this approach, data collection may be time and resource-intensive. For this reason, this paper aims to research the possibility of synthetic dataset creation by using pre-existing dynamic models to test the possibilities of both applications of such synthetic datasets, as well as modeling the dynamics of an industrial manipulator using ML. Authors generate the dataset consisting of 20,000 data points and train seven separate multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural networks (ANN)—one for each joint of the manipulator and one for the total torque—using randomized search (RS) for hyperparameter tuning. Additional MLP is trained for the total torsion of the entire manipulator using the same approach. Each model is evaluated using the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), with 10-fold cross-validation applied. With these settings, all individual joint torque models achieved R 2 scores higher than 0.9, with the models for first four joints achieving scores above 0.95. Furthermore, all models for all individual joints achieve MAPE lower than 2%. The model for the total torque of all joints of the robotic manipulator achieves weaker regression scores, with the R 2 score of 0.89 and MAPE slightly higher than 2%. The results show that the torsion models of each individual joint, and of the entire manipulator, can be regressed using the described method, with satisfactory accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandi Baressi Šegota & Nikola Anđelić & Mario Šercer & Hrvoje Meštrić, 2022. "Dynamics Modeling of Industrial Robotic Manipulators: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Synthetic Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:7:p:1174-:d:786739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/7/1174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/7/1174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Pavlicko & Mária Vojteková & Oľga Blažeková, 2022. "Forecasting of Electrical Energy Consumption in Slovakia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Saralees Nadarajah, 2005. "A generalized normal distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 685-694.
    3. Oleg Krakhmalev & Nikita Krakhmalev & Sergey Gataullin & Irina Makarenko & Petr Nikitin & Denis Serdechnyy & Kang Liang & Sergey Korchagin, 2021. "Mathematics Model for 6-DOF Joints Manipulation Robots," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Ivan Lorencin & Nikola Anđelić & Vedran Mrzljak & Zlatan Car, 2019. "Genetic Algorithm Approach to Design of Multi-Layer Perceptron for Combined Cycle Power Plant Electrical Power Output Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Bartolomeus Häussling Löwgren & Joris Weigert & Erik Esche & Jens-Uwe Repke, 2020. "Uncertainty Analysis for Data-Driven Chance-Constrained Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García, V.J. & Gómez-Déniz, E. & Vázquez-Polo, F.J., 2010. "A new skew generalization of the normal distribution: Properties and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2021-2034, August.
    2. Oksana Mandrikova & Yuryi Polozov & Nataly Zhukova & Yulia Shichkina, 2022. "Approximation and Analysis of Natural Data Based on NARX Neural Networks Involving Wavelet Filtering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Müller K. & Richter W.-D., 2016. "Exact distributions of order statistics of dependent random variables from ln,p-symmetric sample distributions, n ∈ {3,4}," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Xin Chen & Zhangming Shan & Decai Tang & Biao Zhou & Valentina Boamah, 2023. "Interest rate risk of Chinese commercial banks based on the GARCH-EVT model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Jeong, Hanbat & Lee, Lung-fei, 2024. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a spatial autoregressive model for origin–destination flow variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 242(1).
    6. Asif Afzal & Saad Alshahrani & Abdulrahman Alrobaian & Abdulrajak Buradi & Sher Afghan Khan, 2021. "Power Plant Energy Predictions Based on Thermal Factors Using Ridge and Support Vector Regressor Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Kapla, Daniel & Fertl, Lukas & Bura, Efstathia, 2022. "Fusing sufficient dimension reduction with neural networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2023. "Portfolio selection: A target-distribution approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 302-314.
    9. Ghoroghi, Ali & Petri, Ioan & Rezgui, Yacine & Alzahrani, Ateyah, 2023. "A deep learning approach to predict and optimise energy in fish processing industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Agbessi Akuété Pierre & Salami Adekunlé Akim & Agbosse Kodjovi Semenyo & Birregah Babiga, 2023. "Peak Electrical Energy Consumption Prediction by ARIMA, LSTM, GRU, ARIMA-LSTM and ARIMA-GRU Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Tran, Quang Van & Kukal, Jaromir, 2022. "A novel heavy tail distribution of logarithmic returns of cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    12. Jayles, Bertrand & Escobedo, Ramon & Cezera, Stéphane & Blanchet, Adrien & Kameda, Tatsuya & Sire, Clément & Théraulaz, Guy, 2020. "The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups," IAST Working Papers 20-106, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    13. Daniel v{S}tifani'c & Jelena Musulin & Adrijana Miov{c}evi'c & Sandi Baressi v{S}egota & Roman v{S}ubi'c & Zlatan Car, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 on Forecasting Stock Prices: An Integration of Stationary Wavelet Transform and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory," Papers 2007.02673, arXiv.org.
    14. Simon Fritzsch & Maike Timphus & Gregor Weiss, 2021. "Marginals Versus Copulas: Which Account For More Model Risk In Multivariate Risk Forecasting?," Papers 2109.10946, arXiv.org.
    15. Li, Liuling & Mizrach, Bruce, 2010. "Tail return analysis of Bear Stearns' credit default swaps," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1529-1536, November.
    16. Mijeong Kim & Yanyuan Ma, 2019. "Semiparametric efficient estimators in heteroscedastic error models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Jorge Munoz-Minjares & Osbaldo Vite-Chavez & Jorge Flores-Troncoso & Jorge M. Cruz-Duarte, 2021. "Alternative Thresholding Technique for Image Segmentation Based on Cuckoo Search and Generalized Gaussians," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Hossein Moayedi & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Electrical Power Prediction through a Combination of Multilayer Perceptron with Water Cycle Ant Lion and Satin Bowerbird Searching Optimizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Roger W. Barnard & Kent Pearce & A. Alexandre Trindade, 2018. "When is tail mean estimation more efficient than tail median? Answers and implications for quantitative risk management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 47-65, March.
    20. Punzo, Antonio & Bagnato, Luca, 2021. "Modeling the cryptocurrency return distribution via Laplace scale mixtures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:7:p:1174-:d:786739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.