IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i6p919-d770235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Supplier Risk Aversion under the Asymmetric Information of Sales Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Donghong Huang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Jinhui Pang

    (School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Lang Liu

    (School of Economy and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Shuangsheng Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Taisheng Huang

    (School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

In the circumstance that unexpected events lead to the information asymmetry of sales costs, supplier risk aversion and stochastic price, this paper discusses the internal law of using an emergency quantity discount contract to coordinate the supply chain. First, the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) model of supplier risk aversion under the condition of information symmetry is constructed. In addition, the model is extended to the game model of the CVaR of supplier risk aversion under the condition of the asymmetric information of sales costs and solved. After that, the simulation test is performed. The results show that, firstly, under the condition of random price, the supplier risk aversion leads to the phenomenon of bifurcation and mutation in each decision variable of the supply chain system. Secondly, retailers can obtain excess profits by concealing private information, but this harms the interests of suppliers and the entire supply chain. Thirdly, suppliers with different risk attitudes should have different strategies concerning asymmetry in sales cost information. Fourthly, the more asymmetric the information for the sales costs, the more unstable the system. The conclusion is that the phenomenon of bifurcation mutation is the result of the coupling effect of price randomness and supplier risk aversion. The supply chain cannot coordinate in the bifurcation mutation region, but can coordinate outside of it. Hiding private information benefits those who own it, but harms the system as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghong Huang & Jinhui Pang & Lang Liu & Shuangsheng Wu & Taisheng Huang, 2022. "An Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Supplier Risk Aversion under the Asymmetric Information of Sales Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:919-:d:770235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Monahan, 1984. "A Quantity Discount Pricing Model to Increase Vendor Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 720-726, June.
    2. Ali, Syed Mithun & Rahman, Md. Hafizur & Tumpa, Tasmia Jannat & Moghul Rifat, Abid Ali & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2018. "Examining price and service competition among retailers in a supply chain under potential demand disruption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 40-47.
    3. Avinadav, Tal & Chernonog, Tatyana & Meilijson, Isaac & Perlman, Yael, 2022. "A consignment contract with revenue sharing between an app developer and a distribution platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Wei Liu & Shiji Song & Ying Qiao & Han Zhao, 2020. "Supply Chain Coordination with a Loss-Averse Retailer and Combined Contract," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Yang Song & Tijun Fan & Yuewu Tang & Fengli Zou, 2021. "Quality information acquisition and ordering decisions with risk aversion," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(22), pages 6864-6880, November.
    6. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    7. Zhang, Zhichao & Xu, Haiyan & Ke, Ginger Y. & Chen, Kebing, 2022. "Selecting online distribution modes for differentiated products in a platform supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Shuangsheng Wu & Qi Li, 2021. "Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Suppliers Risk Aversion under Stochastic Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Lin & Lv, Wangyong & Yuan, George Xianzhi & Wang, Huiqi, 2023. "The dynamic risk profiles and management strategies in supply chain coopetition under altruistic preference," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    2. Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Hashem Asadi & Ramin Sadeghian & Hadi Sahebi, 2018. "Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Shuangsheng Wu & Qi Li, 2021. "Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Suppliers Risk Aversion under Stochastic Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Zhang, Zhichao & Xu, Haiyan & Zhao, Yingxue & Liu, Zhi & Chen, Kebing, 2023. "Extended warranty service provision: A strategic analysis for the E-commerce platform supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Tian, Longmei & Hu, Benyong, 2023. "The impacts of blockchain adoption on pricing and efforts decisions in online game supply chains with information asymmetry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    6. Hui Zhang & Kai Luo & Guanqun Ni, 2022. "The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1106-1124, July.
    7. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Yingxiao Li & Jianheng Zhou, 2022. "Sustainable Supplier’s Equilibrium Discount Strategy under Random Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Hua Pan & Huimin Zhu & Minmin Teng, 2023. "Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Hota, Soumya Kanti & Sarkar, Biswajit & Ghosh, Santanu Kumar & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Treviño-Garza, Gerardo, 2024. "What should be the best retail strategy to deal with an unequal shipment from an unreliable manufacturer?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Avinadav, Tal & Levy, Priel, 2023. "The effect of an uncertain commission rate on the decisions of a capital-constrained developer," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 11(C).
    14. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    15. Jiafu Tang & Kai-Leung Yung & Iko Kaku & Jianbo Yang, 2008. "The scheduling of deliveries in a production-distribution system with multiple buyers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 5-23, July.
    16. Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Aliasghar Abbasi Kamardi & Moein Beheshti & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Luis Rocha-Lona, 2022. "Analysing supply chain coordination mechanisms dealing with repurposing challenges during Covid-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: a multi-layer decision making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1341-1360, December.
    17. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2011. "Game theoretic pricing and ordering decisions with partial lost sales in two-stage supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 175-185, April.
    18. Albert Y. Ha & Lode Li & Shu-Ming Ng, 2003. "Price and Delivery Logistics Competition in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(9), pages 1139-1153, September.
    19. Liang, Zhiyuan & Tang, Yili & Yu, Jianing & Wang, Yacan, 2024. "A collective incentive strategy to manage ridership rebound and consumer surplus in mass transit systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Yuqiu & Hua, Ye & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "Supplier or co-optor: Optimal channel and logistics selection problems on retail platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 971-988.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:919-:d:770235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.