IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i20p3743-d939759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Versatile and Efficient Novel Approach for Mendelian Randomization Analysis with Application to Assess the Causal Effect of Fetal Hemoglobin on Anemia in Sickle Cell Anemia

Author

Listed:
  • Janaka S. S. Liyanage

    (Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jeremie H. Estepp

    (Departments of Global Pediatric Medicine and Hematology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kumar Srivastava

    (Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

  • Sara R. Rashkin

    (Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

  • Vivien A. Sheehan

    (Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Jane S. Hankins

    (Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

  • Clifford M. Takemoto

    (Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

  • Yun Li

    (Department of Biostatistics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Department of Computer Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Yuehua Cui

    (Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Motomi Mori

    (Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

  • Stephen Burgess

    (MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK
    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK)

  • Michael R. DeBaun

    (Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt-Meharry Sickle Cell Disease Center of Excellence, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA)

  • Guolian Kang

    (Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA)

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is increasingly employed as a technique to assess the causation of a risk factor on an outcome using observational data. The two-stage least-squares (2SLS) procedure is commonly used to examine the causation using genetic variants as the instrument variables. The validity of 2SLS relies on a representative sample randomly selected from a study cohort or a population for genome-wide association study (GWAS), which is not always true in practice. For example, the extreme phenotype sequencing (EPS) design is widely used to investigate genetic determinants of an outcome in GWAS as it bears many advantages such as efficiency, low sequencing or genotyping cost, and large power in detecting the involvement of rare genetic variants in disease etiology. In this paper, we develop a novel, versatile, and efficient approach, namely MR analysis under Extreme or random Phenotype Sampling (MREPS), for one-sample MR analysis based on samples drawn through either the random sampling design or the nonrandom EPS design. In simulations, MREPS provides unbiased estimates for causal effects, correct type I errors for causal effect testing. Furthermore, it is robust under different study designs and has high power. These results demonstrate the superiority of MREPS over the widely used standard 2SLS approach. We applied MREPS to assess and highlight the causal effect of total fetal hemoglobin on anemia risk in patients with sickle cell anemia using two independent cohort studies. A user-friendly Shiny app web interface was implemented for professionals to easily explore the MREPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Janaka S. S. Liyanage & Jeremie H. Estepp & Kumar Srivastava & Sara R. Rashkin & Vivien A. Sheehan & Jane S. Hankins & Clifford M. Takemoto & Yun Li & Yuehua Cui & Motomi Mori & Stephen Burgess & Mich, 2022. "A Versatile and Efficient Novel Approach for Mendelian Randomization Analysis with Application to Assess the Causal Effect of Fetal Hemoglobin on Anemia in Sickle Cell Anemia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3743-:d:939759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, T.W., 2005. "Origins of the limited information maximum likelihood and two-stage least squares estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Anderson, T W & Kunitomo, Naoto & Sawa, Takamitsu, 1982. "Evaluation of the Distribution Function of the Limited Information Maximum Likelihood Estimator," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1009-1027, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, T.W. & Kunitomo, Naoto & Matsushita, Yukitoshi, 2010. "On the asymptotic optimality of the LIML estimator with possibly many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 191-204, August.
    2. Brockhaus, Jan & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Kozicka, Marta, 2016. "What Drives India’s Rice Stocks? Empirical Evidence," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235659, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Guilhem Bascle, 2008. "Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research," Post-Print hal-00576795, HAL.
    4. Joe Hirschberg & Jenny Lye, 2017. "Alternative Graphical Representations of the Confidence Intervals for the Structural Coefficient from Exactly Identified Two-Stage Least Squares," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 2026, The University of Melbourne.
    5. Eduardo Polloni-Silva & Diogo Ferraz & Flávia de Castro Camioto & Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto & Herick Fernando Moralles, 2021. "Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Pollution-Halo/Haven Hypotheses: An Investigation in Brazilian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Moral-Benito, Enrique & Bartolucci, Cristian, 2012. "Income and democracy: Revisiting the evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 844-847.
    7. Hoffmann, Vivian, 2008. "Psychology, Gender, and the Intrahousehold Allocation of Free and Purchased Mosquito Nets," Working Papers 55282, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Fang Hai & Miller Nolan H. & Rizzo John & Zeckhauser Richard, 2011. "Demanding Customers: Consumerist Patients and Quality of Care," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-51, September.
    9. Oberhelman, Dennis & Rao Kadiyala, K., 2000. "Asymptotic probability concentrations and finite sample properties of modified LIML estimators for equations with more than two endogenous variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 163-185, September.
    10. Joshua D. Angrist & Alan B. Krueger, 2001. "Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 69-85, Fall.
    11. Paul A. Bekker & Jan van der Ploeg, 2000. "Instrumental Variable Estimation Based on Grouped Data," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1862, Econometric Society.
    12. Ahn, Seung C. & Lee, Young H. & Schmidt, Peter, 2013. "Panel data models with multiple time-varying individual effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 1-14.
    13. Bonev, Petyo & Glachant, Matthieu & Söderberg, Magnus, 2020. "Testing the regulatory threat hypothesis: Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Angrist, J D & Imbens, G W & Krueger, A B, 1999. "Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 57-67, Jan.-Feb..
    15. Gao, Chuanming & Lahiri, Kajal, 2000. "Further consequences of viewing LIML as an iterated Aitken estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 187-202, October.
    16. Jaeger, David A. & Parys, Juliane, 2009. "On the Sensitivity of Return to Schooling Estimates to Estimation Methods, Model Specification, and Influential Outliers If Identification Is Weak," IZA Discussion Papers 3961, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Ploeg, Jan van der & Bekker, Paul A., 1995. "Efficiency bounds for instrumental variable estimators under group-asymptotics," Research Report 95B24, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    18. Eric Gautier & Christiern Rose, 2022. "Fast, Robust Inference for Linear Instrumental Variables Models using Self-Normalized Moments," Papers 2211.02249, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    19. Forchini, Giovanni, 2010. "The Asymptotic Distribution Of The Liml Estimator In A Partially Identified Structural Equation," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 917-930, June.
    20. Ofria, Ferdinando & Millemaci, Emanuele, 2010. "Kaldor-Verdoorn’s law and increasing returns to scale: a comparison across developed countries," MPRA Paper 30941, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3743-:d:939759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.