IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i15p2808-d882946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio Selection Problem Using CVaR Risk Measures Equipped with DEA, PSO, and ICA Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelouahed Hamdi

    (Mathematics Program, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Arezou Karimi

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht P.O. Box 41938-1914, Iran)

  • Farshid Mehrdoust

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht P.O. Box 41938-1914, Iran)

  • Samir Brahim Belhaouari

    (Division of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 582500, Qatar)

Abstract

Investors always pay attention to the two factors of return and risk in portfolio optimization. There are different metrics for the calculation of the risk factor, among which the most important one is the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). On the other hand, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) can be used to form the optimal portfolio and evaluate its efficiency. In these models, the optimal portfolio is created by stocks or companies with high efficiency. Since the search space is vast in actual markets and there are limitations such as the number of assets and their weight, the optimization problem becomes difficult. Evolutionary algorithms are a powerful tool to deal with these difficulties. The automotive industry in Iran involves international automotive manufacturers. Hence, it is essential to investigate the market related to this industry and invest in it. Therefore, in this study we examined this market based on the price index of the automotive group, then optimized a portfolio of automotive companies using two methods. In the first method, the CVaR measurement was modeled by means of DEA, then Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the Imperial Competitive Algorithm (ICA) were used to solve the proposed model. In the second method, PSO and ICA were applied to solve the CVaR model, and the efficiency of the portfolios of the automotive companies was analyzed. Then, these methods were compared with the classic Mean-CVaR model. The results showed that the automotive price index was skewed to the right, and there was a possibility of an increase in return. Most companies showed favorable efficiency. This was displayed the return of the portfolio produced using the DEA-Mean-CVaR model increased because the investment proposal was basedon the stock with the highest expected return and was effective at three risk levels. It was found that when solving the Mean-CVaR model with evolutionary algorithms, the risk decreased. The efficient boundary of the PSO algorithm was higher than that of the ICA algorithm, and it displayed more efficient portfolios.Therefore, this algorithm was more successful in optimizing the portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelouahed Hamdi & Arezou Karimi & Farshid Mehrdoust & Samir Brahim Belhaouari, 2022. "Portfolio Selection Problem Using CVaR Risk Measures Equipped with DEA, PSO, and ICA Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2808-:d:882946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabrielli, Paolo & Aboutalebi, Reyhaneh & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2022. "Mitigating financial risk of corporate power purchase agreements via portfolio optimization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Gordon J. Alexander & Alexandre M. Baptista, 2004. "A Comparison of VaR and CVaR Constraints on Portfolio Selection with the Mean-Variance Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1261-1273, September.
    3. W. Briec & K. Kerstens & J. B. Lesourd, 2004. "Single-Period Markowitz Portfolio Selection, Performance Gauging, and Duality: A Variation on the Luenberger Shortage Function," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Najafi, Amir Abbas & Mushakhian, Siamak, 2015. "Multi-stage stochastic mean–semivariance–CVaR portfolio optimization under transaction costs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 445-458.
    5. Zdravka Aljinović & Branka Marasović & Tea Šestanović, 2021. "Cryptocurrency Portfolio Selection—A Multicriteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Xiao, Helu & Ren, Tiantian & Zhou, Zhongbao & Liu, Wenbin, 2021. "Parameter uncertainty in estimation of portfolio efficiency: Evidence from an interval diversification-consistent DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Zhu, Shushang & Fan, Minjie & Li, Duan, 2014. "Portfolio management with robustness in both prediction and decision: A mixture model based learning approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-25.
    8. Bodnar, Taras & Lindholm, Mathias & Niklasson, Vilhelm & Thorsén, Erik, 2022. "Bayesian portfolio selection using VaR and CVaR," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    9. Helu Xiao & Tiantian Ren & Zhongbao Zhou & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Parameter uncertainty in estimation of portfolio efficiency: Evidence from an interval diversification-consistent DEA approach," Post-Print hal-03281804, HAL.
    10. Larissa Batrancea, 2021. "An Econometric Approach Regarding the Impact of Fiscal Pressure on Equilibrium: Evidence from Electricity, Gas and Oil Companies Listed on the New York Stock Exchange," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Larissa Batrancea & Malar Mozhi Rathnaswamy & Ioan Batrancea, 2021. "A Panel Data Analysis of Economic Growth Determinants in 34 African Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Branda, Martin, 2013. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 626-635.
    13. Shushang Zhu & Masao Fukushima, 2009. "Worst-Case Conditional Value-at-Risk with Application to Robust Portfolio Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1155-1168, October.
    14. Cui, Xiangyu & Gao, Jianjun & Shi, Yun & Zhu, Shushang, 2019. "Time-consistent and self-coordination strategies for multi-period mean-Conditional Value-at-Risk portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 781-789.
    15. Huang, Dashan & Zhu, Shu-Shang & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Fukushima, Masao, 2008. "Portfolio selection with uncertain exit time: A robust CVaR approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 594-623, February.
    16. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Chen, Ming-Ying, 2018. "Evaluating the dynamic performance of energy portfolios: Empirical evidence from the DEA directional distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 64-78.
    17. Lamb, John D. & Tee, Kai-Hong, 2012. "Data envelopment analysis models of investment funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 687-696.
    18. Joro, Tarja & Na, Paul, 2006. "Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean-variance-skewness framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 446-461, November.
    19. Morey, Matthew R. & Morey, Richard C., 1999. "Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 241-258, April.
    20. Zhou, Zhongbao & Gao, Meng & Xiao, Helu & Wang, Rui & Liu, Wenbin, 2021. "Big data and portfolio optimization: A novel approach integrating DEA with multiple data sources," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Pérez & Héctor López-Ospina, 2022. "Competitive Pricing for Multiple Market Segments Considering Consumers’ Willingness to Pay," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Pejman Peykani & Mojtaba Nouri & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Emran Mohammadi, 2023. "Credibilistic Multi-Period Mean-Entropy Rolling Portfolio Optimization Problem Based on Multi-Stage Scenario Tree," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Helu & Zhou, Zhongbao & Ren, Teng & Liu, Wenbin, 2022. "Estimation of portfolio efficiency in nonconvex settings: A free disposal hull estimator with non-increasing returns to scale," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Zhou, Zhongbao & Xiao, Helu & Jin, Qianying & Liu, Wenbin, 2018. "DEA frontier improvement and portfolio rebalancing: An application of China mutual funds on considering sustainability information disclosure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 111-131.
    3. Ruiyue Lin & Zhiping Chen & Qianhui Hu & Zongxin Li, 2017. "Dynamic network DEA approach with diversification to multi-period performance evaluation of funds," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 821-860, July.
    4. Strub, Moris S. & Li, Duan & Cui, Xiangyu & Gao, Jianjun, 2019. "Discrete-time mean-CVaR portfolio selection and time-consistency induced term structure of the CVaR," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Liu, Wenbin & Zhou, Zhongbao & Liu, Debin & Xiao, Helu, 2015. "Estimation of portfolio efficiency via DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 107-118.
    6. Brandouy, Olivier & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2015. "Frontier-based vs. traditional mutual fund ratings: A first backtesting analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 332-342.
    7. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Mazza, Paolo & Ren, Tiantian & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2022. "Multi-Time and Multi-Moment Nonparametric Frontier-Based Fund Rating: Proposal and Buy-and-Hold Backtesting Strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Chang, Tsung-Sheng & Tone, Kaoru & Wu, Chen-Hui, 2021. "Nested dynamic network data envelopment analysis models with infinitely many decision making units for portfolio evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 766-781.
    9. Martin Branda, 2016. "Mean-value at risk portfolio efficiency: approaches based on data envelopment analysis models with negative data and their empirical behaviour," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 77-99, March.
    10. Adam, Lukáš & Branda, Martin, 2021. "Risk-aversion in data envelopment analysis models with diversification," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Xiao, Helu & Ren, Tiantian & Zhou, Zhongbao & Liu, Wenbin, 2021. "Parameter uncertainty in estimation of portfolio efficiency: Evidence from an interval diversification-consistent DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Zhou, Zhongbao & Jin, Qianying & Xiao, Helu & Wu, Qian & Liu, Wenbin, 2018. "Estimation of cardinality constrained portfolio efficiency via segmented DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 28-37.
    13. Nalpas, Nicolas & Simar, Leopold & Vanhems, Anne, 2016. "Portfolio Selection in a Multi-Input Multi-Output Setting:a Simple Monte-Carlo-FDH Algorithm," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016022, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Octave Jokung, 2007. "Mean-Variance-Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging: A General Shortage Function and Dual Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 135-149, January.
    15. Sehgal, Ruchika & Sharma, Amita & Mansini, Renata, 2023. "Worst-case analysis of Omega-VaR ratio optimization model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Liu, Yong-Jun & Yang, Guo-Sen & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2024. "A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Tsolas, Ioannis E., 2014. "Precious metal mutual fund performance appraisal using DEA modeling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 54-60.
    18. Branda, Martin, 2015. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis based on directional-distance measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 65-76.
    19. Krüger, Jens J., 2024. "Nonparametric portfolio efficiency measurement with higher moments," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 144371, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    20. Ren, Tiantian & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Kumar, Saurav, 2024. "Risk-aversion versus risk-loving preferences in nonparametric frontier-based fund ratings: A buy-and-hold backtesting strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(1), pages 332-344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2808-:d:882946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.