IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i12p2069-d839370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Method for Decision Making by Double-Quantitative Rough Sets in Hesitant Fuzzy Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Zhang

    (College of Artificial Intelligence, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Qian Yang

    (School of Sciences, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

Abstract

In some complex decision-making issues such as economy, management, and social development, decision makers are often hesitant to reach a consensus on the decision-making results due to different goals. How to reduce the influence of decision makers’ subjective arbitrariness on decision results is an inevitable task in decision analysis. Following the principle of improving the fault-tolerance capability, this paper firstly proposes the graded and the variable precision rough set approaches from a single-quantitative decision-making view in a hesitant fuzzy environment (HFEn). Moreover, in order to improve the excessive overlap caused by the high concentration of single quantization, we propose two kinds of double-quantitative decision-making methods by cross-considering relative quantitative information and absolute quantitative information. The proposal of this method not only solves the fuzzy system problem of people’s hesitation in the decision-making process, but also greatly enhances the fault-tolerant ability of the model in application. Finally, we further compare the approximation process and decision results of the single-quantitative models and the double-quantitative models, and explore some basic properties and corresponding decision rules of these models. Meanwhile, we introduce a practical example of housing purchase to expound and verify these theories, which shows that the application value of these theories is impressive.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Zhang & Qian Yang, 2022. "A Novel Method for Decision Making by Double-Quantitative Rough Sets in Hesitant Fuzzy Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:2069-:d:839370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/2069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/2069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huchang Liao & Zeshui Xu & Meimei Xia, 2014. "Multiplicative Consistency Of Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relation And Its Application In Group Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 47-76.
    2. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu & Na Chen, 2013. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-279, March.
    3. B Zhu & Z S Xu, 2013. "Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(12), pages 1831-1840, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaorong He, 2018. "Typhoon disaster assessment based on Dombi hesitant fuzzy information aggregation operators," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(3), pages 1153-1175, February.
    2. Shuli Liu & Xinwang Liu, 2016. "A Sample Survey Based Linguistic MADM Method with Prospect Theory for Online Shopping Problems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 749-774, July.
    3. Runtong Zhang & Jun Wang & Xiaomin Zhu & Meimei Xia & Ming Yu, 2017. "Some Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Aggregation Operators with Their Application to Multiattribute Group Decision-Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, August.
    4. Mi Jung Son & Jin Han Park & Ka Hyun Ko, 2019. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Power-Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Xiaodi Liu & Zengwen Wang & Antoinette Hetzler, 2017. "HFMADM method based on nondimensionalization and its application in the evaluation of inclusive growth," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 726-744, July.
    7. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2015. "Generalized analytic network process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 277-288.
    8. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Palash Dutta & Rupjit Saikia, 2020. "A Decision-making Approach for Choosing a Reliable Product under the Hesitant Fuzzy Environment via a Novel Distance Measure," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 45(3), pages 147-159, September.
    10. Wei Yang & Yongfeng Pang, 2022. "T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, March.
    11. Mousavi, M. & Gitinavard, H. & Mousavi, S.M., 2017. "A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 774-787.
    12. Bai, Chunguang & Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Joint blockchain service vendor-platform selection using social network relationships: A multi-provider multi-user decision perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    13. Wanying Xie & Zeshui Xu & Zhiliang Ren & Hai Wang, 2018. "Probabilistic Linguistic Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application on the Performance Assessment of Xiongan New Area," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1693-1724, November.
    14. Gitinavard, Hossein & Mousavi, S. Meysam & Vahdani, Behnam, 2017. "Soft computing based on hierarchical evaluation approach and criteria interdependencies for energy decision-making problems: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 556-577.
    15. Hüseyin Akay, 2024. "Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Information Fusion Paradigm Integrated with Decision Trees," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(13), pages 5365-5383, October.
    16. Zhang, Hong-yu & Ji, Pu & Wang, Jian-qiang & Chen, Xiao-hong, 2017. "A novel decision support model for satisfactory restaurants utilizing social information: A case study of TripAdvisor.com," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 281-297.
    17. Muhammad Akram & Maham Arshad, 2019. "A Novel Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 565-584, June.
    18. Wang Feng, 2019. "Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 70-89, February.
    19. Lihong Wang & Zaiwu Gong, 2017. "Priority of a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation with a Normal Distribution in Meteorological Disaster Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Liu, Bingsheng & Shen, Yinghua & Zhang, Wei & Chen, Xiaohong & Wang, Xueqing, 2015. "An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 209-225.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:2069-:d:839370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.