IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i11p1848-d826225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Neural Networks to Uncover the Relationship between Highly Variable Behavior and EEG during a Working Memory Task with Distractors

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Beauchene

    (Neuromedical Control Systems Laboratory, Institute for Computational Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Silu Men

    (Neuromedical Control Systems Laboratory, Institute for Computational Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Thomas Hinault

    (U1077 INSERM-EPHE-UNICAEN, 14032 Caen, France)

  • Susan M. Courtney

    (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sridevi V. Sarma

    (Neuromedical Control Systems Laboratory, Institute for Computational Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Value-driven attention capture (VDAC) occurs when previously rewarded stimuli capture attention and impair goal-directed behavior. In a working memory (WM) task with VDAC-related distractors, we observe behavioral variability both within and across individuals. Individuals differ in their ability to maintain relevant information and ignore distractions. These cognitive components shift over time with changes in motivation and attention, making it difficult to identify underlying neural mechanisms of individual differences. In this study, we develop the first participant-specific feedforward neural network models of reaction time from neural data during a VDAC WM task. We used short epochs of electroencephalography (EEG) data from 16 participants to develop the feedforward neural network (NN) models of RT aimed at understanding both WM and VDAC. Using general linear models (GLM), we identified 20 EEG features to predict RT across participants ( r = 0.53 ± 0.08 ). The linear model was compared to the NN model, which improved the predicted trial-by-trial RT for all participants ( r = 0.87 ± 0.04 ). We found that right frontal gamma-band activity and fronto-posterior functional connectivity in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands explain individual differences. Our study shows that NN models can link neural activity to highly variable behavior and can identify potential new targets for neuromodulation interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Beauchene & Silu Men & Thomas Hinault & Susan M. Courtney & Sridevi V. Sarma, 2022. "Using Neural Networks to Uncover the Relationship between Highly Variable Behavior and EEG during a Working Memory Task with Distractors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:1848-:d:826225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/11/1848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/11/1848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederic M. Stoll & Vincent Fontanier & Emmanuel Procyk, 2016. "Specific frontal neural dynamics contribute to decisions to check," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Grohn & Nima Khalighinejad & Caroline I Jahn & Alessandro Bongioanni & Urs Schüffelgen & Jerome Sallet & Matthew F. S. Rushworth & Nils Kolling, 2024. "General mechanisms of task engagement in the primate frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Eleanor Holton & Jan Grohn & Harry Ward & Sanjay G. Manohar & Jill X. O’Reilly & Nils Kolling, 2024. "Goal commitment is supported by vmPFC through selective attention," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1351-1365, July.
    3. Haoyang Lu & Li Yi & Hang Zhang, 2019. "Autistic traits influence the strategic diversity of information sampling: Insights from two-stage decision models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:1848-:d:826225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.