IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i4p122-d1523691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Justice in the Design of a Sugarcane-Derived Biofuel Supply Chain: A Fair Profit Distribution Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy Carvajal

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Monterrey 64700, Mexico)

  • William Sarache

    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Campus La Nubia, Manizales 170001, Colombia)

  • Yasel Costa

    (MIT-Zaragoza Logistics Center (ZLC), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    Universidad de Manizales, College of Economics and Accounting, Manizales 170001, Colombia)

Abstract

Background : In agricultural supply chains, unequal bargaining power often leads to economic inequality, particularly for farmers. The fair profit distribution (FPD) approach offers a solution by optimizing supply chain flows (materials, information, and money) to promote economic equity among members. However, our literature review highlights a gap in applying the FPD approach to the facility location-allocation problem in supply chain network design (SCND), particularly in sugarcane-derived biofuel supply chains. Methods : Consequently, we propose a multi-period optimization model based on FPD to design a sugarcane biofuel supply chain. The methodology involves four steps: constructing a conceptual model, developing a mathematical model, designing a solution strategy, and generating insights. This model considers both investment (crop development, biorefinery construction) and operational phases over a long-term planning horizon, focusing on farm location and crop allocation. Results : By comparing the FPD model to a traditional centralized planning supply chain (CSC) approach, we examine the impact of the planning horizon, number of farms, and sugarcane prices paid by biorefineries on financial performance. While the FPD model results in lower overall system profits, it fosters a fairer economic scenario for farmers. Conclusions : This study contributes to economic justice in supply chains and offers insights to promote fair trade among stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy Carvajal & William Sarache & Yasel Costa, 2024. "Economic Justice in the Design of a Sugarcane-Derived Biofuel Supply Chain: A Fair Profit Distribution Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:122-:d:1523691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu (ed.), 2011. "Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-6151-8, July-Dece.
    2. Xiaopei Dai & Yen-Ting Lin & Ruixia Shi & Di Xu, 2020. "A manufacturer’s responsible sourcing strategy: going organic or participating in fair trade?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 195-218, August.
    3. Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & Donk, Dirk Pieter van & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Crop-related harvesting and processing planning: a review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Colin, Emerson C., 2009. "Mathematical programming accelerates implementation of agro-industrial sugarcane complex," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 232-235, November.
    5. Kumoi, Yuki & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2014. "Vertical integration with endogenous contract leadership: Stability and fair profit allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 221-232.
    6. Xu, Xinhan & Chen, Xiangfeng & Jia, Fu & Brown, Steve & Gong, Yu & Xu, Yifan, 2018. "Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 160-173.
    7. David Barling & Antonella Samoggia & Gudrun Olafsdottir, 2022. "Dynamics of Food Value Chains: Resilience, Fairness and Sustainability," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-5, May.
    8. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Distributive Justice, Goal Clarity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Postawa, Karol, 2016. "Total Chain Integration of sustainable biorefinery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1432-1446.
    10. Soto-Silva, Wladimir E. & Nadal-Roig, Esteve & González-Araya, Marcela C. & Pla-Aragones, Lluis M., 2016. "Operational research models applied to the fresh fruit supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 345-355.
    11. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Rabta, Boualem & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Coordinating quality decisions in a two-stage supply chain under buyer dominance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Liming Liu & Mahmut Parlar & Stuart X. Zhu, 2007. "Pricing and Lead Time Decisions in Decentralized Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 713-725, May.
    13. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2007. "Fairness and Channel Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1303-1314, August.
    14. Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Dias, Ana Cláudia & Iribarren, Diego, 2022. "Definition, assessment and prioritisation of strategies to mitigate social life-cycle impacts across the supply chain of bioelectricity: A case study in Portugal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1110-1118.
    15. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    16. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Borodin, Valeria & Bourtembourg, Jean & Hnaien, Faicel & Labadie, Nacima, 2016. "Handling uncertainty in agricultural supply chain management: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 348-359.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Volha Yakavenka & Ioannis Mallidis & Dimitrios Vlachos & Eleftherios Iakovou & Zafeiriou Eleni, 2020. "Development of a multi-objective model for the design of sustainable supply chains: the case of perishable food products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 593-621, November.
    3. Rana Azab & Rana S. Mahmoud & Rahma Elbehery & Mohamed Gheith, 2023. "A Bi-Objective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for a Sustainable Agro-Food Supply Chain with Product Perishability and Environmental Considerations," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Utomo, Dhanan Sarwo & Onggo, Bhakti Stephan & Eldridge, Stephen, 2018. "Applications of agent-based modelling and simulation in the agri-food supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 794-805.
    5. Jonkman, Jochem & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P. & Bloemhof, Jacqueline M., 2019. "Integrating harvesting decisions in the design of agro-food supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 247-258.
    6. Chintapalli, Prashant & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "The implications of crop minimum support price in the presence of myopic and strategic farmers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 336-349.
    7. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    8. Gómez-Lagos, Javier E. & González-Araya, Marcela C. & Soto-Silva, Wladimir E. & Rivera-Moraga, Masly M., 2021. "Optimizing tactical harvest planning for multiple fruit orchards using a metaheuristic modeling approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 297-312.
    9. Magdalena Leithner & Christian Fikar, 2022. "A simulation model to investigate impacts of facilitating quality data within organic fresh food supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 529-550, July.
    10. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    11. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Murat Öztürk, 2024. "An Agro-Food Planning System: Democratic, Decentralized, Holistic, and Voluntary Participatory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Andrea Gallo & Riccardo Accorsi & Giulia Baruffaldi & Riccardo Manzini, 2017. "Designing Sustainable Cold Chains for Long-Range Food Distribution: Energy-Effective Corridors on the Silk Road Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Martins, C.L. & Melo, M.T. & Pato, M.V., 2019. "Redesigning a food bank supply chain network in a triple bottom line context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 234-247.
    15. Martins, C. L. & Melo, Teresa & Pato, Margarida Vaz, 2016. "Redesigning a food bank supply chain network, Part I: Background and mathematical formulation," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 10, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    16. Víctor M. Albornoz & Gabriel E. Zamora, 2021. "Decomposition-based heuristic for the zoning and crop planning problem with adjacency constraints," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 248-265, April.
    17. Aliano Filho, Angelo & A. Oliveira, Washington & Melo, Teresa, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization for integrated sugarcane cultivation and harvesting planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 330-344.
    18. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    19. Silvia Araújo dos Reis & José Eugenio Leal & Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé, 2023. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Tactical Planning in the Soybean Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-26, August.
    20. An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2016. "Robust grain supply chain design considering post-harvest loss and harvest timing equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 110-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:122-:d:1523691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.