IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i3p48-d860644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption and Influence of Robotic Process Automation in Beef Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Khushboo E-Fatima

    (Department of Business Systems and Operations, University of Northampton, Northampton NN1 5PH, UK)

  • Rasoul Khandan

    (Department of Business Systems and Operations, University of Northampton, Northampton NN1 5PH, UK
    Aston Professional Engineering Centre, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

  • Amin Hosseinian-Far

    (Department of Business Systems and Operations, University of Northampton, Northampton NN1 5PH, UK)

  • Dilshad Sarwar

    (Department of Business Systems and Operations, University of Northampton, Northampton NN1 5PH, UK)

  • Hareer Fatima Ahmed

    (Department of Business Systems and Operations, University of Northampton, Northampton NN1 5PH, UK)

Abstract

Background : This paper aims to critically examine the potential barriers to the implementation and adoption of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in the beef supply chain. The beef supply chain has been challenging due to its complex processes, activities, and management. The beef industry has relied heavily on the human workforce in the past; however, RPA adoption allows automating tasks that are repetitive and strenuous in nature to enhance beef quality, safety and security. There are considerable potential barriers to RPA adoption as organisations have not focused on trying to eliminate them due to various reasons. Previous studies lack knowledge related to potential barriers to RPA adoption, so this creates a research gap and requires attention. Methods: Statistical data and information are extracted using secondary data relevant to RPA adoption in the beef supply chain. A business process model is formed which uses values or variables using existing statistical data and information. Simulation of the process model is carried out using Simul8 software and analyses of different scenarios help in choosing the best approach for RPA adoption. Results: The results have identified the potential barriers in RPA adoption through the simulation process thus ensuring RPA performs with more potential. Analysis of ‘what-if’ scenarios allow organisational and employee-level improvements along with enhancing RPA’s accuracy. Conclusion: The process model is a generic model for use in real-life scenarios and can be modified by organisations according to their own business needs and requirements. The study contributes in theoretical and practical aspects as it allows decision-makers to adopt RPA in a robust manner and adds to scientific knowledge by identification of potential barriers to RPA adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Khushboo E-Fatima & Rasoul Khandan & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Dilshad Sarwar & Hareer Fatima Ahmed, 2022. "Adoption and Influence of Robotic Process Automation in Beef Supply Chains," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:3:p:48-:d:860644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/3/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/3/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Souza Monteiro, Diogo M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2004. "The Economics Of Implementing Traceability In Beef Supply Chains: Trends In Major Producing And Trading Countries," Working Paper Series 14521, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    2. S Robinson, 2008. "Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 278-290, March.
    3. Sinem Büyüksaatçi Kiriş & Merve Ünal, 2020. "Evaluating the Performance of the Production Line with Simulation Approach in Meat Processing Industry: A Case from Turkey," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, June.
    4. S Robinson, 2008. "Conceptual modelling for simulation Part II: a framework for conceptual modelling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 291-304, March.
    5. Hartley, Janet L. & Sawaya, William J., 2019. "Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 707-715.
    6. S Robinson, 2005. "Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 619-629, June.
    7. Manikas, Ioannis & Sundarakani, Balan & John, Jerin Varghese, 2017. "Analysis of operational efficiency of a meat processing supply chain: A case study from the UAE," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hareer Fatima Ahmed & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Rasoul Khandan & Dilshad Sarwar & Khushboo E-Fatima, 2022. "Knowledge Sharing in the Supply Chain Networks: A Perspective of Supply Chain Complexity Drivers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    2. Jason Madan & Meghan Bruce Kumar & Miriam Taegtmeyer & Edwine Barasa & Swaran Preet Singh, 2020. "SEEP-CI: A Structured Economic Evaluation Process for Complex Health System Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Eric Innocenti & Claudio Detotto & Corinne Idda & Dawn Cassandra Parker & Dominique Prunetti, 2023. "Spécification conceptuelle MR POTATOHEAD -Property Market Edition du système complexe d'un territoire touristique à deux marchés : application au territoire corse," Post-Print hal-04121402, HAL.
    4. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.
    5. Robert, Marion & Thomas, Alban & Sekhar, Muddu & Badiger, Shrinivas & Ruiz, Laurent & Raynal, Hélène & Bergez, Jacques-Eric, 2017. "Adaptive and dynamic decision-making processes: A conceptual model of production systems on Indian farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 279-291.
    6. Lehner, Roland, 2023. "Cross-Supply Chain Collaboration Platform for Pallet Management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 138753, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Martin Comis & Catherine Cleophas & Christina Büsing, 2021. "Patients, primary care, and policy: Agent-based simulation modeling for health care decision support," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 799-826, December.
    8. Raghu KC & Mika Aalto & Olli-Jussi Korpinen & Tapio Ranta & Svetlana Proskurina, 2020. "Lifecycle Assessment of Biomass Supply Chain with the Assistance of Agent-Based Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Pigola, Angélica & Da Costa, Priscila Rezende & Ferasso, Marcos & Cavalcanti da Silva, Luís Fabio, 2024. "Enhancing cybersecurity capability investments: Evidence from an experiment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Elias Hartvigsson & Erik Oscar Ahlgren & Sverker Molander, 2020. "Tackling complexity and problem formulation in rural electrification through conceptual modelling in system dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 141-153, January.
    11. Gerrit Muller, 2021. "Applying Roadmapping and Conceptual Modeling to the Energy Transition: A Local Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    13. Robinson, Stewart & Radnor, Zoe J. & Burgess, Nicola & Worthington, Claire, 2012. "SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 188-197.
    14. Chong, Adrian & Augenbroe, Godfried & Yan, Da, 2021. "Occupancy data at different spatial resolutions: Building energy performance and model calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    15. Hana M Dobrovolny & Micaela B Reddy & Mohamed A Kamal & Craig R Rayner & Catherine A A Beauchemin, 2013. "Assessing Mathematical Models of Influenza Infections Using Features of the Immune Response," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Zichong Lyu & Dirk Pons & Yilei Zhang & Zuzhen Ji, 2022. "Minimum Viable Model (MVM) Methodology for Integration of Agile Methods into Operational Simulation of Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Alireza Moumivand & Adel Azar & Abbas Toloie Eshlaghy, 2022. "Combined soft system methodology and agent‐based simulation for multi‐methodological modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 200-217, March.
    18. Penny R. Breeze & Hazel Squires & Kate Ennis & Petra Meier & Kate Hayes & Nik Lomax & Alan Shiell & Frank Kee & Frank de Vocht & Martin O’Flaherty & Nigel Gilbert & Robin Purshouse & Stewart Robinson , 2023. "Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1603-1625, July.
    19. Priscilla Avegliano & Jaime Simão Sichman, 2023. "Equation-Based Versus Agent-Based Models: Why Not Embrace Both for an Efficient Parameter Calibration?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 26(4), pages 1-3.
    20. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:3:p:48-:d:860644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.