IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v3y2019i1p8-d208000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pricing and Acquisition Strategy for New and Remanufactured High-Technology Products

Author

Listed:
  • Liangchuan Zhou

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Surendra M. Gupta

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

New generations of high-technology products are frequently launched before the previous model is sold out. Customers have an incentive to end the use of their old product and purchase a new one with the latest technological innovations. The unsold old models become less attractive, while the supply of remanufactured products from end-of-use products is uncertain in time, quantity, and quality. Other than adjusting the price, upgrading the returning unsold new products may be a source of remedy. This study provides profit maximization models associated with customer choice demand functions based on manufacturer, retailer, and joint supply chain scenarios. Two acquisition strategies are compared: acquire end-of-use products only and collect both end-of-use products and unsold old-style new products. The results reveal that returning the optimal quantity of overstocked new products brings about a greater benefit in all scenarios. Compared to the remanufacturer, the retailer is the optimal undertaker for collecting used products. In addition to this, slow technological development of the new-generation model causes a decrease in profit for the manufacturer. The optimal quantity of new products to be bought back decreases, because both the manufacturer and the retailer prefer to promote unsold outmoded products rather than upgrade the used products.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangchuan Zhou & Surendra M. Gupta, 2019. "A Pricing and Acquisition Strategy for New and Remanufactured High-Technology Products," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:3:y:2019:i:1:p:8-:d:208000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/3/1/8/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/3/1/8/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Norton & Frank M. Bass, 1987. "A Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of High-Technology Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1069-1086, September.
    2. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    3. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    4. Govindan, Kannan & Popiuc, Maria Nicoleta, 2014. "Reverse supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contract: A case for the personal computers industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 326-336.
    5. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    6. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    7. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    8. Franke, C. & Basdere, B. & Ciupek, M. & Seliger, S., 2006. "Remanufacturing of mobile phones--capacity, program and facility adaptation planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 562-570, December.
    9. Ferrer, Geraldo & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2010. "Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 370-379, June.
    10. Gan, Shu San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2015. "Pricing decision model for new and remanufactured short-life cycle products with time-dependent demand," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Liu, Huihui & Lei, Ming & Huang, Tao & Leong, G. Keong, 2018. "Refurbishing authorization strategy in the secondary market for electrical and electronic products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 198-209.
    12. Mustafa Akan & Barış Ata & R. Savaşkan-Ebert, 2013. "Dynamic pricing of remanufacturable products under demand substitution: a product life cycle model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Wang, Wenyuan & Wang, Yue & Mo, Daniel & Tseng, Mitchell M., 2017. "Managing component reuse in remanufacturing under product diffusion dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 551-560.
    14. James D. Abbey & Margaret G. Meloy & V. Daniel R. Guide Jr. & Selin Atalay, 2015. "Remanufactured Products in Closed-Loop Supply Chains for Consumer Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(3), pages 488-503, March.
    15. Zhu, Stuart X., 2013. "Dynamic replenishment, production, and pricing decisions, in the face of supply disruption and random price-sensitive demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 612-619.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    2. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
    3. Ze-Bin Wang & Yao-Yu Wang & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Optimal distribution channel strategy for new and remanufactured products," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 269-295, June.
    4. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    7. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.
    9. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2012. "The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 387-400.
    10. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2017. "Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 120-132.
    11. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    12. Lili Dai & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai, 2020. "CSR Remanufacturing Supply Chains under WTP Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Han, Xiaohua & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer & Pu, Xujin, 2017. "Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 602-616.
    14. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Li, Wei & Jin, Mingzhou & Galbreth, Michael R., 2024. "Should original equipment manufacturers authorize third-party remanufacturers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 1013-1028.
    16. Xiong, Yu & Zhao, Quanwu & Zhou, Yu, 2016. "Manufacturer-remanufacturing vs supplier-remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 21-28.
    17. Benrong Zheng & Chao Yang & Jun Yang & Min Zhang, 2017. "Dual-channel closed loop supply chains: forward channel competition, power structures and coordination," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3510-3527, June.
    18. Mitra, Subrata, 2016. "Models to explore remanufacturing as a competitive strategy under duopoly," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 215-227.
    19. Kleber, Rainer & Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Reimann, Marc, 2020. "Proprietary parts as a secondary market strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 929-941.
    20. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:3:y:2019:i:1:p:8-:d:208000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.