IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v2y2018i1p7-d134700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considering Materials Management in Construction: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zakaria Dakhli

    (Civil Engineering, Ecole Centrale de Lille, 59651 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

  • Zoubeir Lafhaj

    (Civil Engineering, Ecole Centrale de Lille, 59651 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France)

Abstract

While materials count for a considerable amount of construction costs, the way materials are managed seems to be improvised rather than approached methodically. This study investigates the practice of novel techniques used to manage materials in the construction industry. Techniques that have already proven themselves to be efficient ways to manage the production pace within the industry include the pull system, Just-In-Time, Kitting and off-site fabrication. These are explained and assessed in the context of the French construction industry through an exploratory study, supported by a questionnaire completed by contractors. The results reveal that a clear plan to manage materials on-site is lacking among the respondents, creating common inventory problems. This research provides evidence to support the central role played by an efficient management of material flow on-site. It also highlights the obstacles that hinder the adoption of innovative techniques, such as sub-contractor coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakaria Dakhli & Zoubeir Lafhaj, 2018. "Considering Materials Management in Construction: An Exploratory Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:7-:d:134700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/2/1/7/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/2/1/7/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viktoria Sundquist & Lars-Erik Gadde & Kajsa Hulthén, 2018. "Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 49-65, January.
    2. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mabaran Rajaraman & Glenn Philen & Kenji Shimada, 2019. "Tracking Tagged Inventory in Unstructured Environments through Probabilistic Dependency Graphs," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-23, September.
    2. SeyedReza RazaviAlavi & Simaan AbouRizk, 2021. "Construction Site Layout Planning Using a Simulation-Based Decision Support Tool," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Kudrekodlu V. Prasad & Venkatesan Vasugi, 2023. "Readiness Factors for Sustainable Lean Transformation of Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Aspasia Koutsokosta & Stefanos Katsavounis, 2020. "A Dynamic Multi-Period, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for Cost Minimization of a Three-Echelon, Multi-Site and Multi-Product Construction Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-35, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafaela Tirado & Adélaïde Aublet & Sylvain Laurenceau & Mathieu Thorel & Mathilde Louërat & Guillaume Habert, 2021. "Component-Based Model for Building Material Stock and Waste-Flow Characterization: A Case in the Île-de-France Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-34, November.
    2. Anna Fredriksson & Linnea Eriksson & Jonas Löwgren & Nina Lemon & Daniel Eriksson, 2022. "An Interactive Visualization Tool for Collaborative Construction Logistics Planning—Creating a Sustainable Project Vicinity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Sonja Kolarić & Mladen Vukomanović & Antonio Ramljak, 2022. "Analyzing the Level of Detail of Construction Schedule for Enabling Site Logistics Planning (SLP) in the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Keisuke Yoshida & Keijiro Okuoka & Alessio Miatto & Liselotte Schebek & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2019. "Estimation of Mining and Landfilling Activities with Associated Overburden through Satellite Data: Germany 2000–2010," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Yupeng Liu & Wei-Qiang Chen & Tao Lin & Lijie Gao, 2019. "How Spatial Analysis Can Help Enhance Material Stocks and Flows Analysis?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, March.
    7. Yupeng Liu & Jiajia Li & Wei‐Qiang Chen & Lulu Song & Shaoqing Dai, 2022. "Quantifying urban mass gain and loss by a GIS‐based material stocks and flows analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1051-1060, June.
    8. Babak Ebrahimi & Leonardo Rosado & Holger Wallbaum, 2022. "Machine learning‐based stocks and flows modeling of road infrastructure," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 44-57, February.
    9. Carine Lausselet & Johana Paola Forero Urrego & Eirik Resch & Helge Brattebø, 2021. "Temporal analysis of the material flows and embodied greenhouse gas emissions of a neighborhood building stock," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 419-434, April.
    10. Dombi, Mihály, 2021. "Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Ahmet Anil Sezer & Anna Fredriksson, 2021. "Paving the Path towards Efficient Construction Logistics by Revealing the Current Practice and Issues," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Jing Guo & Lingwen Sun & Ruirui Zhang & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Qian Liu & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2023. "Spatial–temporal dynamics of the built environment toward sustainability: A material stock and flow analysis in Chinese new and old urban areas," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 84-95, February.
    13. Huimin Liu & Mengqian Xu & Xuexi Yang & Yan Shi & Min Deng, 2023. "Spatial Layout Assessment of Urban Mining Pilot Bases in China Based on Multi-Source Data Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Natthanij Soonsawad & Raymundo Marcos‐Martinez & Heinz Schandl, 2024. "City‐scale assessment of the material and environmental footprint of buildings using an advanced building information model: A case study from Canberra, Australia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 247-261, April.
    15. Benjamin Sprecher & Teun Johannes Verhagen & Marijn Louise Sauer & Michel Baars & John Heintz & Tomer Fishman, 2022. "Material intensity database for the Dutch building stock: Towards Big Data in material stock analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 272-280, February.
    16. Jakob Lederer & Johann Fellner & Andreas Gassner & Karin Gruhler & Georg Schiller, 2021. "Determining the material intensities of buildings selected by random sampling: A case study from Vienna," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 848-863, August.
    17. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    18. Carlos Mesta & Ramzy Kahhat & Sandra Santa‐Cruz, 2019. "Geospatial Characterization of Material Stock in the Residential Sector of a Latin‐American City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 280-291, February.
    19. Chenling Fu & Yan Zhang & Tianjie Deng & Ichiro Daigo, 2022. "The evolution of material stock research: From exploring to rising to hot studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 462-476, April.
    20. Yan Shi & Shanshan Shao & Xuexi Yang & Da Wang & Bingrong Chen & Min Deng, 2023. "Metabolic Process Modeling of Metal Resources Based on System Dynamics—A Case Study for Steel in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:7-:d:134700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.