IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v6y2017i4p31-d123108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Disability Rights to the Rights of the Dying (and Back Again)

Author

Listed:
  • Harold Braswell

    (Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA)

Abstract

This article argues for civil rights for dying people. The creation of such rights should be understood as complementary to, but distinct from, existing initiatives to provide dying people with social benefits. A basis for rights for terminally ill people can be found in the disability rights movement. Through an ethnographic case study of two dying individuals, I argue that terminally ill people can be subjected to disability discrimination as it is understood within the dominant theoretical framework of disability rights: the social model of disability. Nevertheless, while disability rights provides a theoretical basis for understanding discrimination against people who are dying, existing U.S. disability rights legislation largely does not recognize, nor address this discrimination. For this reason, it is necessary to develop a separate set of rights of the dying. I conclude by arguing that such “dying rights” are a logical extension of disability rights, and will bring ancillary benefits to both disabled people and the disability rights movement itself. There is thus a strong foundation for a legal and political alliance between disability rights advocates and advocates for people who are dying.

Suggested Citation

  • Harold Braswell, 2017. "From Disability Rights to the Rights of the Dying (and Back Again)," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:31-:d:123108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers, 2017. "Reading Alexander V. Choate Rightly: Now is the Time," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Levitsky, Sandra R., 2014. "Caring for Our Own: Why There is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199993130.
    3. Aldridge, M.D. & Kelley, A.S., 2015. "The myth regarding the high cost of end-of-life care," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(12), pages 2411-2415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ela, Nate, 2018. "Use-Based Welfare: Property Experiments in Chicago, 1895-1935," SocArXiv 5qpa6, Center for Open Science.
    2. M. Devaux & A. Lerouge & Bruno Ventelou & Y. Goryakin & A. Feigl & S. Vuik & M. Cecchini, 2019. "Assessing the potential outcomes of achieving the World Health Organization global non-communicable diseases targets for risk factors by 2025: is there also an economic dividend?," Post-Print hal-02475129, HAL.
    3. Brewer, Alexandra, 2018. "“We were on our own”: Mothers' experiences navigating the fragmented system of professional care for autism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 61-68.
    4. Valarie Blake, 2017. "Rethinking the Americans with Disabilities Act’s Insurance Safe Harbor," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Eric French & John Bailey Jones & Elaine Kelly & Jeremy McCauley, 2018. "End-of-Life Medical Expenses," Working Paper 18-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    6. Altomonte, Guillermina, 2022. "Coordinating illness and insurance trajectories: Evidence from a post-acute care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    7. Kirkland, Anna, 2021. "Dropdown rights: Categorizing transgender discrimination in healthcare technologies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Kasteridis, Panagiotis & Rice, Nigel & Santos, Rita, 2022. "Heterogeneity in end of life health care expenditure trajectory profiles," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-251.
    9. Seaman, Aaron T., 2018. "The consequence of “doing nothing”: Family caregiving for Alzheimer's disease as non-action in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:31-:d:123108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.