IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v5y2016i2p16-d66783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Perceptions of Internal Security on the Relationship between “Sensitive Urban Zones” and Immigrant Criminality

Author

Listed:
  • Maria João Guia

    (University of Coimbra Institute for Legal Research (UCILeR), Pátio da Universidade, 3004-528 Coimbra, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • João Pedroso

    (University of Coimbra, Centro de Estudos Sociais, Colégio de S. Jerónimo, Largo D. Dinis, Apartado 3087, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The Portuguese social sciences literature has recently begun to make references to so-called “sensitive urban zones” (SUZs), described as vulnerable zones on the outskirts of big cities (e.g., Lisbon and Setúbal) where the population suffers from poor socioeconomic conditions. The same literature has also described these zones as being areas where migrants, especially people from Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOP), and the unemployed tend to congregate. Since the beginning of the century, these areas have seen the number of foreigners of certain ethnicities rising, especially after the last mass regularization of migrants. At the same time, police forces describe these zones as being primary intervention areas, leading to the targeting of SUZ residents. Moreover, certain new migrant groups to Portugal (and to these SUZs) are over-represented in Portuguese prisons, suggesting some bias on the part of the judicial system, who have historically described SUZs as areas of growing criminality and drug trafficking. As such, SUZ residents are thought to need greater social control, and more visible and selective policing. Within this framework, police have institutionalized a perception of SUZs as crime ghettos in need of targeting, these perceptions being reinforced by documentation concerning the “rise” of new forms of violent crime from abroad. Therefore, it is important to study these perceptions of crime as contributing to the characterization of SUZs as being areas of criminality, and how such perceptions are reinforced by the legislature’s designation of SUZs as being areas requiring “special policing strategies”. This article will focus on the balance between the selectivity of police and the justice system in Lisbon’s SUZs, with an emphasis on issues pertaining to immigration and crime. Moreover, we consider wider societal perceptions of crime, where stereotypes are constructed around a vulnerable population as needing social policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria João Guia & João Pedroso, 2016. "Institutional Perceptions of Internal Security on the Relationship between “Sensitive Urban Zones” and Immigrant Criminality," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:16-:d:66783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/5/2/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald van Kempen & A. şule Özüekren, 1998. "Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1631-1656, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sako Musterd & Ronald Van Kempen, 2009. "Segregation And Housing Of Minority Ethnic Groups In Western European Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 559-566, September.
    2. Anne Slob & Ronald Van Kempen & Gideon Bolt, 2006. "Spatial Knock-On Effects of Area-Based Urban Policies: Practices From Utrecht, the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa06p464, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Dalal, Pamela & Chen, Yali & Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2012. "Dynamic Opportunity-Based Multipurpose Accessibility Indicators in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt474714fg, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Kadi Mägi & Kadri Leetmaa & Tiit Tammaru & Maarten van Ham, 2016. "Types of spatial mobility and change in people's ethnic residential contexts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(41), pages 1161-1192.
    5. Chiu, Lai Fong & West, Robert M., 2007. "Health intervention in social context: Understanding social networks and neighbourhood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(9), pages 1915-1927, November.
    6. Özlem Güzey & Nevin Gültekin & Ogan Kýrsaçlýoðlu & Erman Aksoy & Ela Ataç, 2014. "Acculturation Process of the Immigrant Turks Living in Deventer, The Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa14p70, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Dalal, Pamela & Chen, Yali & Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2011. "Dynamic Opportunity-Based Multipurpose Accessibility Indicators in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2920x3kw, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Eva K. Andersson & Torkild Hovde Lyngstad & Bart Sleutjes, 2018. "Comparing Patterns of Segregation in North-Western Europe: A Multiscalar Approach," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(2), pages 151-168, May.
    9. Gideon Bolt & Ronald Van Kempen & Jan Van Weesep, 2009. "After Urban Restructuring: Relocations And Segregation In Dutch Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 502-518, September.
    10. Darinka Czischke & Carla J. Huisman, 2018. "Integration through Collaborative Housing? Dutch Starters and Refugees Forming Self-Managing Communities in Amsterdam," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 156-165.
    11. Helen Kruythoff, 2003. "DUTCH URBAN RESTRUCTURING POLICY IN ACTION AGAINST SOCIO-spATIAL SEGREGRATION: SENSE OR NONSENSE?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 193-215.
    12. Bevelander, Pieter & Pendakur, Ravi, 2011. "Citizenship and Employment ? comparing two cool countries," CEPR Discussion Papers 8182, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Mägi, Kadi & Leetmaa, Kadri & Tammaru, Tiit & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Types of Spatial Mobility and the Ethnic Context of Destination Neighbourhoods in Estonia," IZA Discussion Papers 9602, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Ronald Van Kempen & Alan Murie, 2009. "The New Divided City: Changing Patterns In European Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 377-398, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:16-:d:66783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.