IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v10y2021i2p35-d552327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediated Visibility and Public Environmental Litigation: The Interplay between Inside and Outside Court during Environmental Conflict in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia Nixon

    (The Media School, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7001, Australia)

  • Claire Konkes

    (The Media School, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7001, Australia)

  • Libby Lester

    (The Media School, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7001, Australia)

  • Kathleen Williams

    (The Media School, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7001, Australia)

Abstract

Conflicts over environmental sustainability are increasingly being fought in court, such as the use of Public Environmental Litigation (PEL) to challenge developments impacting the environment in Australia and elsewhere. News media coverage of PEL introduces legal actors to the dynamics of mediatized environmental conflict, which provides a platform for conflict actors to gain mediated visibility for their cause to influence public debate. When legal opportunities, such as PEL, are used as a campaign tactic, the dynamics of contest are exposed and, while courts have some power over legal actors, parties seek news media to favorably translate legal outcomes to the public. This article explores the nexus of PEL, news media, and communication strategies to find greater understanding of who gains from the mediated visibility that occurs when transnational environmental campaigns take their claims to court. Using content analysis and discourse analysis of news texts and semi-structured interviews relating to eight PEL cases instigated to stop the Adani Carmichael coal megamine in Australia, we seek better understanding of the mechanisms at play when PEL campaigns appear in news media, and find that the dominance of outside court sources in news coverage not only privilege the political aspects of PEL over the legal, but highlights how strategic litigation, such as PEL, can be used to influence public opinion and, therefore, a political response, regarding environmental conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia Nixon & Claire Konkes & Libby Lester & Kathleen Williams, 2021. "Mediated Visibility and Public Environmental Litigation: The Interplay between Inside and Outside Court during Environmental Conflict in Australia," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:35-:d:552327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison Anderson, 2011. "Sources, media, and modes of climate change communication: the role of celebrities," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 535-546, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascale Chapdelaine & Vincent Manzerolle, 2021. "The Regulation of Media and Communications in the Borderless Networked Society," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-7, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gössling, Stefan, 2019. "Celebrities, air travel, and social norms," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Christopher Wright & Daniel Nyberg, 2022. "The Roles of Celebrities in Public Disputes: Climate Change and the Great Barrier Reef," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1788-1816, November.
    3. Timár, Barnabás, 2023. "A klímavédelmi események hatása a köztudatra és a tőkepiacra. Empirikus vizsgálat Google-trends- és ETF-adatokon [The impact of climate events on public perception and capital markets. An empirical," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 713-745.
    4. Liu, Jiaqi & Liu, Jicai & Bu, Zehui & Zhou, Yining & He, Peifen, 2022. "Path analysis of influencing government's excessive behavior in PPP project: Based on field dynamic theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 522-540.
    5. Julie Doyle & Nathan Farrell & Michael K. Goodman, 2020. "The cultural politics of climate branding: Project Sunlight, the biopolitics of climate care and the socialisation of the everyday sustainable consumption practices of citizens-consumers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 117-133, November.
    6. Inna Čábelková & Luboš Smutka & Wadim Strielkowski, 2022. "Public support for sustainable development and environmental policy: A case of the Czech Republic," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 110-126, February.
    7. Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Chen, Feng & Xia, Neng & Wu, Bao, 2024. "Institutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:35-:d:552327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.