IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i4p124-d348863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Community Land Record System in Monwabisi Park Informal Settlement in the Context of Hybrid Governance and Organisational Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Barry

    (Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N1N4, Canada)

  • Rosalie Kingwill

    (Research consultant and Associate at the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape 7700, South Africa)

Abstract

The study examined the effectiveness of a community-operated land record system (CRS), a product of an evolutionary information system planning approach under hybrid governance arrangements in Monwabisi Park informal settlement in Cape Town. To structure the analysis, the authors adapted an analytical framework for analysing land registration effectiveness to community records systems. It serves as a tool for analysing, designing and managing similar information systems. The CRS is an element of a participatory planning and development project involving a triad: (a) community-based organisations (CBOs); (b) a non-governmental organisation (NGO), which has acted as a change agent, facilitator and resource provider; and (c) the City of Cape Town. The hybrid governance institutions comprised a set of local community and government protocols. Of further significance are the organisational cultures of the CBOs, and the NGO’s information system team differs markedly from that of most land registries. The researchers examined the CRS database and operations management, interviewed key-informants and interviewed shack residents door-to-door. The CRS was effective because residents used it and largely adhered to the associated documented community protocols to defend their tenure and to effect transactions in shacks. Further contributors were the NGO and CBOs continually managed the institutional and leadership dynamics relevant to the CRS, factors often ignored in similar projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Barry & Rosalie Kingwill, 2020. "Evaluating the Community Land Record System in Monwabisi Park Informal Settlement in the Context of Hybrid Governance and Organisational Culture," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:124-:d:348863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/4/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/4/124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Huchzermeyer, 2009. "The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlements: a reflection on cases in Gauteng," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 59-73.
    2. Elinor Ostrom, 2008. "Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper than Markets and Hierarchies," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 30, pages 819-848, Springer.
    3. Christian Lund, 2016. "Rule and Rupture: State Formation through the Production of Property and Citizenship," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(6), pages 1199-1228, November.
    4. Lengoiboni, Monica & Richter, Christine & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2019. "Cross-cutting challenges to innovation in land tenure documentation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 21-32.
    5. Barry, Michael, 2020. "Hybrid land tenure administration in Dunoon, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), 2008. "Handbook of New Institutional Economics," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-69305-5, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zaid Abubakari & Christine Richter & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2020. "Evaluating Some Major Assumptions in Land Registration: Insights from Ghana’s Context of Land Tenure and Registration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mari-Liis Kukk & Laivi Laidroo, 2020. "Institutional Drivers of Crowdfunding Volumes," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Pietrzak, Michał & Ziętara, Wojciech, 2022. "Beyond the Black Box: Towards a Systems Theory of Farming Family and Family Farm," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 320082, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    3. Thees, Oliver & Olschewski, Roland, 2017. "Physical soil protection in forests - insights from production-, industrial- and institutional economics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 99-106.
    4. Górriz-Mifsud, Elena & Olza Donazar, Luis & Montero Eseverri, Eduardo & Marini Govigli, Valentino, 2019. "The challenges of coordinating forest owners for joint management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 100-109.
    5. Luigi Romano & Marcello Ruberti, 2019. "Focus on the Performances of the Most Advanced Italian Thermoelectric Power Plants," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 264-273.
    6. Wenwen Sheng & M. C. Sunny Wong, 2017. "Capital Flow Management Policies and Riskiness of External Liability Structures: the Role of Local Financial Markets," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 461-498, July.
    7. Nicola Gennaioli & Enrico Perotti, 2009. "Standardized enforcement: Access to justice vs contractual innovation," Economics Working Papers 1329, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jun 2012.
    8. Spiller, Pablo T., 2013. "Transaction cost regulation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 232-242.
    9. Militiades N. Georgiou & Nicholas Kyriazis & Emmanouil M. L. Economou, 2015. "Democracy, Political Stability and Economic performance. A Panel Data Analysis," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18.
    10. Malcolm Childress & Selina Carter & Edgard Barki, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose, Private-Sector Led Land Regularization and Financing of Informal Settlements in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Mwakatumbula, Hilda Jacob & Moshi, Goodiel Charles & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2019. "Consumer protection in the telecommunication sector: A comparative institutional analysis of five African countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    12. Guido Möllering, 2010. "Kartelle, Konsortien, Kooperationen und die Entstehung neuer Märkte," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(7), pages 770-796, November.
    13. Muok, Benard Oula & Mosberg, Marianne & Eriksen, Siri Ellen Hallstrøm & Ong'ech, Dennis Onyango, 2021. "The politics of forest governance in a changing climate: Political reforms, conflict and socio-environmental changes in Laikipia, Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Zaid Abubakari & Christine Richter & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2020. "Evaluating Some Major Assumptions in Land Registration: Insights from Ghana’s Context of Land Tenure and Registration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Märker, Carolin & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – The scope of action for institutional change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 290-300.
    16. Minna Havukainen & Mirja Mikkilä & Helena Kahiluoto, 2022. "Climate Policy Reform in Nepal through the Lenses of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Maria Angela Perito & Marcello De Rosa & Luca Bartoli & Emilio Chiodo & Giuseppe Martino, 2017. "Heterogeneous Organizational Arrangements in Agrifood Chains: A Governance Value Analysis Perspective on the Sheep and Goat Meat Sector of Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Sonin, Konstantin & Acemoglu, Daron & Egorov, Georgy, 2020. "Institutional Change and Institutional Persistence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15295, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Kabigi, B. & de Vries, Walter T. & Kelvin, H., 2021. "A neo-institutional analysis of alternative land registration systems in Tanzania: The cases of Babati and Iringa districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    20. Hanna Almlöf & Per-Olof Bjuggren, 2019. "A regulation and transaction cost perspective on the design of corporate law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 407-433, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:124-:d:348863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.