IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v7y2018i2p74-d152107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of Traditional Farming to Ecosystem Services Provision: Case Studies from Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Špulerová

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 254, Štefanikova 3, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • František Petrovič

    (Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Peter Mederly

    (Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Matej Mojses

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, branch Nitra, Akademická 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Zita Izakovičová

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 254, Štefanikova 3, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to assess the benefits provided by the ecosystems of traditional agricultural landscapes (TAL) and compare them to the outputs of large-scale agriculture. Assessment of ecosystem services (ES) was performed in four case-study areas situated in Slovakia, representing different types of TAL: Viticultural landscape, meadow–pasture landscape, and agricultural landscape with dispersed settlements and mosaics of orchards. The methodological approach was focused on assessment of all the principal types of ES—regulation and maintenance, provisioning, and cultural. Differences in the provision of ES due to the impact of different practices and intensities of agricultural landscape management were subsequently assessed and compared. The results show that TAL are generally more diverse and balanced regarding ES provision, mainly because of their varied patterns and their related functions. In particular they play an important role in water retention and the prevention of soil erosion—both important with respect to changes in climate. Modern intensive agriculture is principally able to fulfil the production functions. Support for traditional farming, landscape diversification and small-scale agricultural management is vital for enhancing the values of rural regions. Such measures could become key drivers for sustainable agricultural management in Slovakia, and elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Špulerová & František Petrovič & Peter Mederly & Matej Mojses & Zita Izakovičová, 2018. "Contribution of Traditional Farming to Ecosystem Services Provision: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:74-:d:152107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/74/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/74/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raatikainen, Kaisa J. & Barron, Elizabeth S., 2017. "Current agri-environmental policies dismiss varied perceptions and discourses on management of traditional rural biotopes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 564-576.
    2. Juraj Lieskovský & Tibor Lieskovský & Veronika Piscová, 2017. "Physical accessibility and its role in landscape development—three historical analyses from South Slovakia," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 498-507, July.
    3. Lausch, Angela & Blaschke, Thomas & Haase, Dagmar & Herzog, Felix & Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe & Tischendorf, Lutz & Walz, Ulrich, 2015. "Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 31-41.
    4. Jeffrey M. Peterson & Richard N. Boisvert & Harry de Gorter, 2002. "Environmental policies for a multifunctional agricultural sector in open economies," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 29(4), pages 423-443, December.
    5. Lerouge, Frederik & Sannen, Kurt & Gulinck, Hubert & Vranken, Liesbet, 2016. "Revisiting production and ecosystem services on the farm scale for evaluating land use alternatives," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 50-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Slámová & Ingrid Belčáková, 2019. "The Role of Small Farm Activities for the Sustainable Management of Agricultural Landscapes: Case Studies from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Maolin Li & Yongxun Zhang & Changhong Miao & Lulu He & Jiatao Chen, 2022. "Centennial Change and Source–Sink Interaction Process of Traditional Agricultural Landscape: Case from Xin’an Traditional Cherry Cultivation System (1920–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Peter Bezák & Peter Mederly & Zita Izakovičová & Milena Moyzeová & Magdaléna Bezáková, 2020. "Perception of Ecosystem Services in Constituting Multi-Functional Landscapes in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Eduardo Morales-Jerrett & Juan Manuel Mancilla-Leytón & Manuel Delgado-Pertíñez & Yolanda Mena, 2020. "The Contribution of Traditional Meat Goat Farming Systems to Human Wellbeing and Its Importance for the Sustainability of This Livestock Subsector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Zita Izakovičová & László Miklós & Viktória Miklósová & František Petrovič, 2019. "The Integrated Approach to Landscape Management —Experience from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Kirill A. Zhichkin & Vladimir V. Nosov & Lyudmila N. Zhichkina & Artur A. Gubadullin, 2022. "The Theory of Agriculture Multifunctionality on the Example of Private Households," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Ingrid Belčáková & Branislav Olah & Martina Slámová & Zuzana Pšenáková, 2021. "A Cultural and Environmental Assessment of a Landscape Archetype with Dispersed Settlements in Čadca Cadastral District, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glebe, Thilo W., 2011. "Welfare economics of agricultural trade liberalisation and strategic environmental policy," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(2).
    2. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín & Vavrouchová Hana & Ševelová Miloslava & Kozlovská Silvie & Doskočilová Veronika & Lincová Helena, 2015. "Changes Of A Rural Landscape In Czech Areas Of Different Types," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 111-133, June.
    3. Arovuori, Kyösti & Kola, Jukka, 2005. "Multifunctional Policy Measures for Multifunctional Agriculture," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24771, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Troxler, David & Zabel, Astrid & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne, 2023. "Identifying drivers of forest clearances in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Rizov, Marian & Davidova, Sophia & Bailey, Alastair, 2019. "Employment effects of CAP payments in the UK non-farm economy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 147-161.
    6. Casamatta, Georges & Rausser, Gordon C. & Simon, Leo K., 2008. "Optimal taxation with joint production of agriculture and rural amenities," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0nv609hm, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    7. Boisvert, Richard N. & Blandford, David, 2012. "Meeting multiple policy objectives under GHG emission reduction targets," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 135515, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. FRASER Iain & WASCHIK Robert, 2010. "Agricultural Land Retirement for Biodiversity: The Australian Wool Industry," EcoMod2003 330700055, EcoMod.
    9. Alexander E. Cagle & Alona Armstrong & Giles Exley & Steven M. Grodsky & Jordan Macknick & John Sherwin & Rebecca R. Hernandez, 2020. "The Land Sparing, Water Surface Use Efficiency, and Water Surface Transformation of Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Affek, Andrzej N. & Jabs-Sobocińska, Zofia & Wolski, Jacek & Radeloff, Volker C., 2023. "Pockets of persistence of agricultural land use during the socioeconomic shock of forced post-WWII displacements in the Carpathians," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Glebe, Thilo & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 82.
    14. Thilo W. Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2008. "Assessing the production and welfare effects of agri-environmental policy: a conceptual analysis," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 75-92.
    15. Álvarez, Antonio & Roibás, David, 2006. "An Economic Model to Evaluate the Contribution of Genetics to Milk Production," Efficiency Series Papers 2006/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    16. Kan, Iddo & Haim, David & Rapaport-Rom, Mickey & Shechter, Mordechai, 2009. "Environmental amenities and optimal agricultural land use: The case of Israel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1893-1898, April.
    17. Jan & Zawadka & Agata & Balinska & Piotr & Gabryjonczyk, 2021. "Agritourism as a Form of Free Time Activity Among Families with Kids in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 571-582.
    18. Happe, Kathrin & Damgaard, Martin & Osuch, Amanda & Sattler, Claudia & Zander, Peter & Uthes, Sandra & Schuler, Johannes & Piorr, Annette, 2006. "CAP-reform and the provision of non-commodity outputs in Brandenburg," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(05-06), pages 1-12.
    19. Rolf Jens Brunstad & Ivar Gaasland & Erling Vardal, 2005. "Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(4), pages 469-488, December.
    20. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N. & Blandford, David, 2005. "Achieving Environmental Objectives Under Reduced Domestic Agricultural Support and Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Application to Taiwan," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 16-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:74-:d:152107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.