IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p317-d1583886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multisensory Health and Well-Being of Chinese Classical Gardens: Insights from Humble Administrator’s Garden

Author

Listed:
  • Li Guo

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xueqian Gong

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yinan Li

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    School of Urban Construction, Anhui Xinhua University, Hefei 230088, China)

  • Deshun Zhang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Mohamed Elsadek

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jiayan Yun

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Hassan Ahmad

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Manqin Yao

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Nian Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Chinese classical gardens serve as restorative environments that epitomize the essence of Chinese aesthetics. Despite their recognized Outstanding Universal Value, research on the multisensory experiences and associated well-being benefits they offer remains insufficiently explored. This study examines the Humble Administrator’s Garden through a multisensory framework incorporating visual, auditory, and tactile dimensions. By employing a mixed methods approach that integrates questionnaires and physiological measurements, we assessed the psychophysiological responses of 78 participants before and after entering the garden, as well as at distinct landscape points. Key findings reveal the following: (1) the traditional garden environment evoked significant positive perceptual effects; (2) the garden, with its diverse combination of landscape elements—including architecture, water features, rock formations, and plants—was strongly associated with enhanced well-being outcomes. A higher diversity of visual landscapes yielded more pronounced benefits, with water features exerting the most substantial positive influence on health, while rock formations showed a comparatively lesser effect; and (3) physiological and psychological responses of participants varied within the same landscape setting, with tactile experiences eliciting the most profound psychological changes. These findings underscore the pivotal role of multisensory engagement in Chinese classical gardens for fostering well-being, offering valuable health-related benefits beyond their cultural and ecological significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Guo & Xueqian Gong & Yinan Li & Deshun Zhang & Mohamed Elsadek & Jiayan Yun & Hassan Ahmad & Manqin Yao & Nian Li, 2025. "Multisensory Health and Well-Being of Chinese Classical Gardens: Insights from Humble Administrator’s Garden," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:317-:d:1583886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Li & Bing Xia & Anne Lusk & Xing Liu & Ning Lu, 2019. "The Humanmade Paradise: Exploring the Perceived Dimensions and Their Associations with Aesthetic Pleasure for Liu Yuan, a Chinese Classical Garden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Shiyi Guo & Yan Zhou & Jianing Yu & Liuqi Yang, 2022. "Effects of the Combination of Audio and Visual Factors on Mental Restoration in a Large-Scale Urban Greenway: Perspectives from Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Liu & Baolong Han & Deming Tan & Dawei Wu & Chengji Shu, 2023. "The Value of Ecosystem Traffic Noise Reduction Service Provided by Urban Green Belts: A Case Study of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Lina Yan & Yile Chen & Liang Zheng & Yi Zhang & Xiao Liang & Chun Zhu, 2023. "Intelligent Generation Method and Sustainable Application of Road Systems in Urban Green Spaces: Taking Jiangnan Gardens as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-80, February.
    3. Huishu Chen & Li Yang, 2023. "Analysis of Narrative Space in the Chinese Classical Garden Based on Narratology and Space Syntax—Taking the Humble Administrator’s Garden as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Tianjiao Yan & Hong Leng & Qing Yuan, 2023. "The Role of “Nostalgia” in Environmental Restorative Effects from the Perspective of Healthy Aging: Taking Changchun Parks as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Chang Li & Xiaohui Huang, 2022. "Differences in Visual Attraction between Historical Garden and Urban Park Walking Scenes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:317-:d:1583886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.