IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p131-d1564053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Environmental Suitability for the Spatial Distribution of Minority Villages in Mountainous Areas—Taking Fujian Province as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiang Xu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Hong Wu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Daxun Hao

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Hantao Wang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

The geographical environment and economic conditions that influence the spatial distribution of minority villages vary significantly, particularly in mountainous regions where they face different levels of disaster risks. Environmental suitability assessment can help us gain a deeper understanding of the differences and degrees of differences among different villages and provide a basis for resource allocation and planning. This study focuses on 499 national level and 68 provincial level minority villages in Fujian province and evaluates the environmental suitability of their spatial distribution using analysis tools such as ArcMap and GeoDetector. The research findings indicated: (1) The ratio between the influence strengths of natural geographical, socioeconomic, and disaster constraint indicators on the environmental suitability of minority villages in mountainous areas is 5:10:7, with the highest influence being the regional gross domestic product (RGDP) in the socioeconomic indicator (0.509) and the lowest influence being flood sensitivity (0.011). (2) Areas with high suitability values are in the southeast coastal and central regions. From east to west, the suitability values gradually decrease. The suitable areas cover 87.2% of the total region, including 91.9% of the minority villages. (3) The geographical correlation coefficient between the spatial distribution of minority villages and environmental suitability is 86.87, indicating a high degree of spatial interaction and fit between the two. This validates the rationality of the multi-factor evaluation model for assessing the environmental suitability of ethnic village spatial distribution in mountainous areas. (4) There is an inverse “U” relationship between environmental suitability and the distribution of national and provincial level minority villages. With the increase in the suitability index, the number of national level minority villages tends to increase, while the number of provincial level minority villages tends to decrease. The research findings have significant implications for promoting the sustainable development of minority villages in Fujian province and provide reference for the regional development and protection of minority villages in other mountainous areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese & Xiang Xu & Hong Wu & Daxun Hao & Hantao Wang, 2025. "Assessment of Environmental Suitability for the Spatial Distribution of Minority Villages in Mountainous Areas—Taking Fujian Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:131-:d:1564053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Zhanfeng & Sun, Li, 2016. "The planning, development and management of tourism: The case of Dangjia, an ancient village in China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 52-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng Liu & Ming Bai & Min Yao & Ke Huang, 2021. "Identifying the natural and anthropogenic factors influencing the spatial disparity of population hollowing in traditional villages within a prefecture-level city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Zaitul Zaitul & Ilona Desi & Novianti Neva, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    3. Tie Wang & Wei Wang & Zhongjun Wu & Ching-Hui Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen, 2019. "Understanding Farm Households’ Participation in Nong Jia Le in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Yafang Bao & Hanjing Jiang & Emily Ma & Zhi Sun & Lihua Xu, 2022. "A Longitudinal Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Ancient Village Tourism Development in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Christou, Prokopis & Hadjielia Drotarova, Maria, 2022. "Digitalization, agility, and customer value in tourism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Gao, Jing & Wu, Bihu, 2017. "Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 223-233.
    7. Grabin Praničević, Daniela & Peterlin, Judita, 2017. "Are ICT Tools Recognized Enough as Management Support in Croatian Tourism?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 33-40, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    8. Gao, Chunliu & Cheng, Li, 2020. "Tourism-driven rural spatial restructuring in the metropolitan fringe: An empirical observation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Xuesong Xi & Haiyun Xu & Qiang Zhao & Guohan Zhao, 2021. "Making Rural Micro-Regeneration Strategies Based on Resident Perceptions and Preferences for Traditional Village Conservation and Development: The Case of Huangshan Village, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Ronizi, Saeed Reza Akbarian & Mokarram, Marzieh & Negahban, Saeed, 2020. "Utilizing multi-criteria decision to determine the best location for the ecotourism in the east and central of Fars province, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Chao Wu & Miaomiao Chen & Lei Zhou & Xiaojin Liang & Wei Wang, 2020. "Identifying the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Traditional Villages in China: A Multiscale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Guannan Zhu & Xiande Li & Yongxun Zhang, 2021. "Multi-Stakeholder Involvement Mechanism in Tourism Management for Maintaining Terraced Landscape in Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) Sites: A Case Study of Dazhai Village in Longji Terra," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Zuoming Jiang & Derong Lin, 2022. "Genius Loci of Ancient Village from the Perspective of Tourists Experience: Scale Development and Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Xiang Xu & Paolo Vincenzo Genovese & Yafei Zhao & Yidan Liu & Eyasu Markos Woldesemayat & Abraham Nathan Zoure, 2022. "Geographical Distribution Characteristics of Ethnic-Minority Villages in Fujian and Their Relationship with Topographic Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Sheng Liu & Ming Bai & Min Yao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Function and Structure to Assess Landscape Ecological Risk in Traditional Village Clustering Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:131-:d:1564053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.