IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2024i1p41-d1555170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Carbon Balance and Its Response to Urbanization: A Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Xinling Jiang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xu Chu

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xinyu Yang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Ping Jiang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jing’an Zhu

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Zhongyao Cai

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Siqi Yu

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Fudan Tyndall Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Urbanization and its impact on land use and land cover change are key drivers of global carbon balance shifts. Understanding the spatiotemporal evolution of carbon balance in relation to urbanization helps optimize regional planning and sustainable development. This study develops a city-level land use carbon balance system to quantify the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use carbon balance across 130 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB). Moran’s Index is applied to assess the spatial correlation of carbon balance, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) is used to explore the relationship between urbanization levels and net carbon emissions. The results show the following: (1) From 2005 to 2021, land use carbon absorption in YREB cities remained relatively stable, whereas carbon emissions increased. Net carbon emissions increased by 574.61, 456.16, and 1163.60 Mt C in the upper, middle, and lower reaches, respectively. Nearly 98% of the cities exhibited a carbon balance index greater than 1, indicating a carbon deficit. Carbon emission intensity displayed a decreasing trend, with the most significant reductions observed in the middle reaches. (2) Land use carbon balance exhibits significant positive spatial correlation, with cities in the northeastern lower reaches and southwestern upper reaches forming “high–high” and “low–low” net carbon emission clusters. (3) Urbanization and per capita net carbon emissions followed an inverted “N”-shaped curve, with turning points at around 30% and 85% urbanization. This study provides insights into optimizing land use carbon management amidst urban growth in the YREB.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinling Jiang & Xu Chu & Xinyu Yang & Ping Jiang & Jing’an Zhu & Zhongyao Cai & Siqi Yu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Carbon Balance and Its Response to Urbanization: A Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:41-:d:1555170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/41/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/41/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yunqiang & Zhu, Jialing & Li, Eldon Y. & Meng, Zhiyi & Song, Yan, 2020. "Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Huangling Gu & Yan Liu & Hao Xia & Zilong Li & Liyuan Huang & Yanjia Zeng, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Differences in CO 2 Equivalent Emissions and Carbon Compensation Caused by Land Use Changes and Industrial Development in Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    4. Xiaoxin Zhang & Martin Brandt & Xiaowei Tong & Philippe Ciais & Yuemin Yue & Xiangming Xiao & Wenmin Zhang & Kelin Wang & Rasmus Fensholt, 2022. "A large but transient carbon sink from urbanization and rural depopulation in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 321-328, April.
    5. Alexey Mikhaylov & Nikita Moiseev & Kirill Aleshin & Thomas Burkhardt, 2020. "Global climate change and greenhouse effect," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2897-2913, June.
    6. Yiqi Fan & Ying Wang & Rumei Han & Xiaoqin Li, 2024. "Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Carbon Budgets and Carbon Balance Zoning: A Case Study of the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Shengli Dai & Weimin Zhang & Yingying Wang & Ge Wang, 2022. "Examining the Impact of Regional Development Policy on Industrial Structure Upgrading: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Zhou & Meng Shi & Qi Huang & Tao Shi, 2021. "Do Double-Edged Swords Cut Both Ways? The Role of Technology Innovation and Resource Consumption in Environmental Regulation and Economic Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Senlin Hu & Gang Zeng & Xianzhong Cao & Huaxi Yuan & Bing Chen, 2021. "Does Technological Innovation Promote Green Development? A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Cong Li & Xihua Liu & Xue Bai & Muhammad Umar, 2020. "Financial Development and Environmental Regulations: The Two Pillars of Green Transformation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Alsagr, Naif, 2023. "How environmental policy stringency affects renewable energy investment? Implications for green investment horizons," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. James Ming Chen & Mira Zovko & Nika Šimurina & Vatroslav Zovko, 2021. "Fear in a Handful of Dust: The Epidemiological, Environmental, and Economic Drivers of Death by PM 2.5 Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-59, August.
    6. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Michael Greenstone & Rema Hanna, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3038-3072, October.
    8. Dongqing Han & Dayong Zhang & Peng Yue & Zhengxu Cao, 2024. "Toward Sustainable Development: Can Digital Transformation of Industrial Enterprise Drive Carbon Reduction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    10. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2008. "The Contribution of Pollution to Productivity Growth," Working Paper series 06_08, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    11. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    12. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    13. Giedrė Lapinskienė & Kęstutis Peleckis & Neringa Slavinskaitė, 2017. "Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1082-1097, November.
    14. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    15. Paul Welfens & Jens Perret & Deniz Erdem, 2010. "Global economic sustainability indicator: analysis and policy options for the Copenhagen process," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 153-185, August.
    16. Nicole Grunewald & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2009. "Driving Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and the Impact from Kyoto Protocol," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 190, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Lei Gao & Taowu Pei & Jingran Zhang & Yu Tian, 2022. "The “Pollution Halo” Effect of FDI: Evidence from the Chinese Sichuan–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Bradford David F. & Fender Rebecca A & Shore Stephen H. & Wagner Martin, 2005. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, June.
    19. Ghimire, Narishwar & Woodward, Richard T., 2013. "Under- and over-use of pesticides: An international analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-81.
    20. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:41-:d:1555170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.