IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1476-d1476667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Cropland Reclamation and Abandonment in Xinjiang

Author

Listed:
  • Yuling Fang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Shixin Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Guanyu Hou

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Weiyi Long

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Since China’s reform and opening up in 1978, the reclamation and abandonment of cropland in Xinjiang have become significant features of the land use change in the arid land of Northwest China. However, the spatiotemporal changes and driving mechanisms of cropland reclamation and abandonment over long time periods are still unclear, but this is crucial in understanding cropland changes in inland arid land, providing important insights for land management and agricultural development. Based on 40 years of remote sensing data on resources and the environment, this study examines the spatiotemporal characteristics of cropland reclamation and abandonment in Xinjiang over four periods since 1980. Additionally, it uses an optimal parameter geographical detector model to quantify the driving factors for each period. The results indicate that cropland reclamation experiences a “slow decrease–rapid increase” trend, forming a “V-shaped” pattern, while abandonment shows a “rapid decrease–slow decrease–slow increase” trend, forming a “U-shaped” pattern. These trends can be divided into three periods: 1980–1990 (unstable growth), 1990–2010 (stable growth), and 2010–2020 (growth with constraints). The movement pattern of cropland reclamation’s center of gravity is “slightly southeast–slightly northeast–southwest”, whereas the abandonment’s center of gravity shifts “northeast–southwest–northeast”. Further analysis reveals that the impact of agricultural technological investment and infrastructure on cropland reclamation has increased, while the influence of natural environmental factors has decreased. Although climate and water resources remain key factors in cropland abandonment, the influence of economic and social factors has gradually diminished, and the impact of agricultural mechanization has steadily risen.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuling Fang & Shixin Wu & Guanyu Hou & Weiyi Long, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Cropland Reclamation and Abandonment in Xinjiang," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1476-:d:1476667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haichang Yang & Fenghua Zhang & Yun Chen & Tingbao Xu & Zhibo Cheng & Jing Liang, 2016. "Assessment of Reclamation Treatments of Abandoned Farmland in an Arid Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Zhiyang Wang & Sizhong Sun, 2016. "Transportation infrastructure and rural development in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 516-525, September.
    3. Wang, Siliang & Tan, Shukui & Yang, Shengfu & Lin, Qiaowen & Zhang, Lu, 2019. "Urban-biased land development policy and the urban-rural income gap: Evidence from Hubei Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Lijun Zuo & Zengxiang Zhang & Kimberly M. Carlson & Graham K. MacDonald & Kate A. Brauman & Yingchun Liu & Wen Zhang & Huayong Zhang & Wenbin Wu & Xiaoli Zhao & Xiao Wang & Bin Liu & Ling Yi & Qingke , 2018. "Progress towards sustainable intensification in China challenged by land-use change," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(6), pages 304-313, June.
    5. Zhiyang Wang & Sizhong Sun, 2016. "Transportation infrastructure and rural development in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 516-525, September.
    6. Wenjiao Shi & Fulu Tao & Jiyuan Liu & Xinliang Xu & Wenhui Kuang & Jinwei Dong & Xiaoli Shi, 2014. "Has climate change driven spatio-temporal changes of cropland in northern China since the 1970s?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 163-177, May.
    7. Tyler J. Lark & Seth A. Spawn & Matthew Bougie & Holly K. Gibbs, 2020. "Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Xu, Feng & Wang, Zhanqi & Chi, Guangqing & Zhang, Zhexi, 2020. "The impacts of population and agglomeration development on land use intensity: New evidence behind urbanization in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Ziyang Yu & Zhenzhen Li & Haoxuan Yang & Yihao Wang & Yang Cui & Guoping Lei & Shuai Ye, 2023. "Contrasting responses of spatiotemporal patterns of cropland to climate change in Northeast China," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1197-1214, October.
    3. Meseret Chanieabate & Hai He & Chuyue Guo & Betelhem Abrahamgeremew & Yuanji Huang, 2023. "Examining the Relationship between Transportation Infrastructure, Urbanization Level and Rural-Urban Income Gap in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Qin Li & Shuangning Lv & Jingya Cui & Dongchen Hou & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2024. "Sustainability Constraints on Rural Road Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Liu, Qiyang & Ma, Tianyu & Liu, Zhengying, 2024. "Reconceptualising transport-related social exclusion in rural China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Lu, Haiyan & Zhao, Pengjun & Hu, Haoyu & Yan, Jie & Chen, Xiaoping, 2023. "Exploring the heterogeneous impact of road infrastructure on rural residents’ income: Evidence from nationwide panel data in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 155-166.
    7. Yuejuan Yang & Kun Wang & Di Liu & Xinquan Zhao & Jiangwen Fan & Jinsheng Li & Xiajie Zhai & Cong Zhang & Ruyi Zhan, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Losses in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Qiu, Bingwen & Li, Haiwen & Tang, Zhenghong & Chen, Chongcheng & Berry, Joe, 2020. "How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Li, Mengxu & Liu, Jianghua & Chen, Yang & Yang, Zhijiu, 2023. "Can sustainable development strategy reduce income inequality in resource-based regions? A natural resource dependence perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Xin Deng & Dingde Xu & Miao Zeng & Yanbin Qi, 2018. "Landslides and Cropland Abandonment in China’s Mountainous Areas: Spatial Distribution, Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Lu, Shenghua & Wang, Hui, 2023. "How revolving-door recruitment makes firms stand out in land market: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Chen, Feifei & Qiu, Huanguang & Zhao, Yilin & Wei, Xun & Wan, Xiangyuan, 2024. "Impact of new maize variety adoption on yield and fertilizer input in China: Implications for sustainable food and agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Dora Almeida & Luísa Carvalho & Paulo Ferreira & Andreia Dionísio & Inzamam Ul Haq, 2024. "Global Dynamics of Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Cross-Correlation Analysis of Income and CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-35, October.
    18. Zhang Zhang & Huimin Zhou & Shuxian Li & Zhibin Zhao & Junbo Xu & Yuansuo Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Krisztina Soreg & Guillermo Bermudez-Gonzalez, 2021. "Measuring the Socioeconomic Development of Selected Balkan Countries and Hungary: A Comparative Analysis for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Yanli Gao & Hongbo Li & Yan Song, 2021. "Interaction Relationship between Urbanization and Land Use Multifunctionality: Evidence from Han River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1476-:d:1476667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.