IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1318-d1459933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Urban Ecological Welfare Performance: An ST-LMDI Approach to the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yang

    (Department of Economics, The Engineering & Technical College of Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, China
    College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Zhigang Li

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    Research Center for Protection Policy of Key Ecological Functional Areas in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Enhancing urban ecological welfare performance is essential for achieving sustainable urban development and fostering a comprehensive regional green transformation. This study develops a quantitative assessment framework for urban ecological welfare performance, grounded in both the welfare of urban residents and their consumption of ecological resources. Employing the spatio-temporal Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model to dissect the ecological welfare performance across 108 key prefecture-level cities within China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt, considering both temporal and spatial dimensions, the analysis reveals a “W”-shaped trajectory in the ecological welfare performance from 2006 to 2022, characterized by pronounced spatial disparities. Particularly in the downstream coastal regions and notably the Yangtze River Delta, advantages in social and economic structures, along with public fiscal outlays, contribute to a superior ecological welfare performance, exhibiting a notable spatial spillover effect. The study introduces six key factors—social benefit, economic benefit, population dispersion, population density in urban areas, urbanization scale, and ecological sustainability—to examine their influence on ecological welfare performance, uncovering substantial differences in the outcomes of temporal and spatial decomposition. Temporal decomposition indicates that economic benefit and urbanization scale are the primary drivers enhancing ecological welfare performance, whereas population dispersion is identified as the primary inhibitor. Spatial decomposition reveals that the determinants of above-average urban ecological welfare vary regionally and undergo dynamic shifts over time. Overall, a holistic understanding of the interplay among economic growth, ecological preservation, and the enhancement of residents’ welfare can inform the development and execution of tailored policies by local governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yang & Zhigang Li, 2024. "Improving Urban Ecological Welfare Performance: An ST-LMDI Approach to the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1318-:d:1459933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhigang Li & Jie Yang & Jialong Zhong & Dong Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Agglomeration Ecological Sustainability and Identification of Influencing Factors: Based on the 3DEF Model and the Random Forest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Lingyan Bao & Xuhui Ding & Jingxian Zhang & Dingyi Ma, 2023. "Can New Urbanization Construction Improve Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Chen, Youlin & Wang, Lei & Yu, Peiheng & Cheng, Changxu, 2024. "Linkages between digital economy and ecosystem services: Revealing the spatiotemporal relationship based on U-shaped effect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Shuwen Jiang, 2022. "Research on Spatial Differences and Driving Effects of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Xiaoling Xie & Qi Zhu, 2023. "Research on the Impact of Urban Expansion on Habitat Quality in Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Haoyang Lu & Jing Tong & Yajiao Tang, 2022. "Analysis of Green Credit and the Ecological Welfare Performance Based on Empirical Models and ARIMA(2,3,2): Taking China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jing Bian & Ying Wang & Wenxin Shen, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Diganta Das & Tracey Skelton, 2020. "Hydrating Hyderabad: Rapid urbanisation, water scarcity and the difficulties and possibilities of human flourishing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1553-1569, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Yu Zhang & Xi Cai & Yanying Mao & Liudan Jiao & Liu Wu, 2023. "What Is the State of Development of Eco-Wellbeing Performance in China? An Analysis from a Three-Stage Network Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Xuanmiao Peng & Xiaoai Dai & Ryan Shi & Yujian Zheng & Xinyue Liu & Yuhe Xiao & Weile Li & Yang Zhang & Jue Wang & Huan Huang, 2024. "Investigating the Effects of Mining on Ecosystem Services in Panzhihua City: A Multi-Scenario Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Dongqing Han & Zhengxu Cao, 2024. "Evaluation and Influential Factors of Urban Land Use Efficiency in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Siying Chen & Zhixiong Tan & Xingwang He & Lichen Zhang, 2023. "The Measurements and Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Variations of Human Development Index Based on Planetary Boundaries in China: Evidence from Provincial-Level Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Qingsong Ni & Xue Ma & Ruiming Duan & Yan Liang & Peng Cui, 2024. "Research on the Coupling Co-ordination between Quality of County-Level New Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in Shaanxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Qin Zhu & Yaxin Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Differences of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Poyang Lake Area at the Local Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Kai Zhang & Dong Yan, 2023. "Enhancing the Community Environment in Populous Residential Districts: Neighborhood Amenities and Residents’ Daily Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Jing Bian & Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jiamin Bai & Yuanping Wang, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation of Chinese Major Node Cities along the Belt and Road," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Can Zhang & Jixia Li & Tengfei Liu & Mengzhi Xu & Huachun Wang & Xu Li, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Chinese Cities’ Ecological Welfare Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Michelle Ann Miller & Mike Douglass & Jonathan Rigg, 2020. "Governing resilient cities for planetary flourishing in the Asia-Pacific," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1359-1371, May.
    12. Yun Qing & Bingjian Zhao & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "The Coupling and Coordination of Agricultural Carbon Emissions Efficiency and Economic Growth in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1318-:d:1459933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.