IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1135-d1442603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Value or Meta Value? The Value of Virtual Land during the Metaverse’s Digital Era

Author

Listed:
  • Aurora Greta Ruggeri

    (Department ICEA—Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Giuliano Marella

    (Department ICEA—Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Laura Gabrielli

    (Department of Architecture, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

Abstract

Nowadays, some of the most expensive real estate is not “real” at all. Several investors are purchasing land in the virtual world of the Metaverse. To be more accurate in the wording, they are buying “meta-estates”. This work is dedicated to opening a debate about this emerging research field within the real estate discipline. It begins by discussing market segmentation, ownership, and pricing by comparing the traditional real estate market with the virtual estate market. Furthermore, this study involved interviews with six seasoned Metaverse land investors who participated in two Analytic Hierarchy Processes (AHPs). The first AHP ranked 14 investment typologies, while the second focused on ranking and discussing the most important characteristics of meta-estates that influence the formation of prices. As a result, the most appealing investments identified were day-trading, virtual land trading (buying to resell), and virtual land development (transforming and reselling). The primary characteristics of meta-estates considered by investors include the platform (e.g., Earth 2, Sandbox), the location within the platform (proximity to famous neighbours), and the architectural design of the buildings (designed by renowned architects). It is evident that the Metaverse represents a new frontier for land investors, and the primary aim of this study was to encourage other researchers to explore and investigate this evolving field.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Giuliano Marella & Laura Gabrielli, 2024. "Market Value or Meta Value? The Value of Virtual Land during the Metaverse’s Digital Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1135-:d:1442603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodman, Allen C. & Thibodeau, Thomas G., 2003. "Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 181-201, September.
    2. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    3. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    2. José-María Montero & Román Mínguez & Gema Fernández-Avilés, 2018. "Housing price prediction: parametric versus semi-parametric spatial hedonic models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 27-55, January.
    3. repec:asg:wpaper:1044 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Antonio Páez & Fei Long & Steven Farber, 2008. "Moving Window Approaches for Hedonic Price Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Modelling Techniques," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(8), pages 1565-1581, July.
    5. Pascoe, Sean & Doshi, Amar & Kovac, Mladen & Austin, Angelica, 2019. "Estimating coastal and marine habitat values by combining multi-criteria methods with choice experiments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Faroek Lazrak & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld & Jan Rouwendal, 2014. "The market value of cultural heritage in urban areas: an application of spatial hedonic pricing," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-114, January.
    7. Fernando, Angeline Gautami & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi, 2023. "What do consumers want? A methodological framework to identify determinant product attributes from consumers’ online questions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Nishi, Hayato & Asami, Yasushi & Shimizu, Chihiro, 2021. "The illusion of a hedonic price function: Nonparametric interpretable segmentation for hedonic inference," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. William Cheung & Lewen Guo & Yuichiro Kawaguchi, 2021. "Automated valuation model for residential rental markets: evidence from Japan," Journal of Spatial Econometrics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Gao, Qishuo & Shi, Vivien & Pettit, Christopher & Han, Hoon, 2022. "Property valuation using machine learning algorithms on statistical areas in Greater Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Yan Kestens & Marius Thériault & François Des Rosiers, 2006. "Heterogeneity in hedonic modelling of house prices: looking at buyers’ household profiles," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 61-96, March.
    12. Martin Bohl & Winfried Michels & Jens Oelgemöller, 2012. "Determinanten von Wohnimmobilienpreisen: Das Beispiel der Stadt Münster," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 193-208, September.
    13. Ward, Clement E. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Dutton, Jennifer M., 2008. "Implicit Value of Retail Beef Product Attributes," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-18.
    14. Reynolds, Travis & Kolodinsky, Jane & Murray, Byron, 2012. "Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for compact fluorescent lighting: Policy implications for energy efficiency promotion in Saint Lucia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 712-722.
    15. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Letki, Natalia & Tryjanowski, Piotr & Wąs, Adam, 2021. "Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Hyowon Kim & Dong Soo Kim & Greg M. Allenby, 2020. "Benefit Formation and Enhancement," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-468, December.
    18. Anderson, Simon P. & Foros, Øystein & Kind, Hans Jarle, 2012. "Product quality, competition, and multi-purchasing," Discussion Papers 2012/9, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    19. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    20. Mika Kortelainen & Timo Kuosmanen, 2007. "Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 57-69, October.
    21. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1135-:d:1442603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.