IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1001-d1430177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Rice–Crayfish Field Fragmentation Based on Landscape Indices: A Case Study of Qianjiang City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Shi

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xu He

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Bo Hu

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jiuwei Li

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lei Yu

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Since the 21st century, rice–crayfish fields have been widely distributed in the Yangtze River Basin in China. However, the spontaneous construction of these fields by farmers has given rise to the issue of rice–crayfish field fragmentation (RCFF) in certain areas. This study introduced a novel method for evaluating RCFF using township-level administrative regions as the evaluation units. Three key evaluation elements, including five landscape indices, were employed: area and edge metrics (rice–crayfish area ratio), shape metrics (perimeter–area ratio distribution), and aggregation metrics (rice–crayfish patch density, percentage of like adjacencies, and rice–crayfish contagion index). The RCFF was quantified and its spatial distribution pattern was analyzed through the entropy method and GIS spatial analysis. Empirical studies conducted in Qianjiang city yielded insightful results: (1) The contribution of evaluation elements to the RCFF was ranked in descending order as follows: aggregation metrics > shape metrics > area and edge metrics. (2) The RCFF of Yunlianghu farm was the lowest at 0.06, while the RCFF of Yangshi subdistrict 2 was the highest at 0.94. The spatial distribution of the RCFF exhibited a distinct trend, showing a gradual decrease from the northeast to the southwest in Qianjiang, and a low-RCFF area in the southwest. This evaluation system enables local government decisionmakers to comprehend the current status of rice–crayfish field management and construction. It facilitates the scientific planning of rice–crayfish field layouts and provides guidance for farmers in their expansion strategies. This method can be promoted in counties (cities) where rice–crayfish fields are primarily distributed in the Yangtze River Basin, promoting the transition of traditional agriculture to environmentally friendly agriculture in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Shi & Xu He & Bo Hu & Jiuwei Li & Lei Yu, 2024. "Evaluation of Rice–Crayfish Field Fragmentation Based on Landscape Indices: A Case Study of Qianjiang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1001-:d:1430177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgina Milne & Andrew William Byrne & Emma Campbell & Jordon Graham & John McGrath & Raymond Kirke & Wilma McMaster & Jesko Zimmermann & Adewale Henry Adenuga, 2022. "Quantifying Land Fragmentation in Northern Irish Cattle Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Gang Fu & Wei Wang & Junsheng Li & Nengwen Xiao & Yue Qi, 2021. "Prediction and Selection of Appropriate Landscape Metrics and Optimal Scale Ranges Based on Multi-Scale Interaction Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shangkun Yu & Yi Miao & Mengcheng Li & Xiaoming Ding & Chengxin Wang & Wangsheng Dou, 2022. "Theoretical Development Model for Rural Settlements against Rural Shrinkage: An Empirical Study on Pingyin County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2023. "Investigating the Factors Influencing the Intention to Adopt Long-Term Land Leasing in Northern Ireland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Hebing Zhang & Qingqing Yan & Fangfang Xie & Shouchen Ma, 2023. "Evaluation and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Security Based on a CA-Markov Model in Overlapped Area of Crop and Coal Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Dongjie Wang & Hao Yang & Yueming Hu & A-Xing Zhu & Xiaoyun Mao, 2022. "Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Fragmentation and Their Influencing Factors in a Rapidly Developing Region: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry & Paul Caskie, 2023. "Barriers and Enablers of Long‐term Land Leasing: a Case Study of Northern Ireland," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(2), pages 20-27, August.
    6. Sonali Sharma & Pawan Kumar Joshi & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Exploring Multiscale Influence of Urban Growth on Landscape Patterns of Two Emerging Urban Centers in the Western Himalaya," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Chenyang Liu & Xiuyi Shi & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Digital Technology, Factor Allocation and Environmental Efficiency of Dairy Farms in China: Based on Carbon Emission Constraint Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Lu Niu & Mengyao Xu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Investigation and Comparison of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Farmland Fragmentation in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China, and Bavaria, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Karolina Zięba-Kulawik & Piotr Wężyk, 2022. "Monitoring 3D Changes in Urban Forests Using Landscape Metrics Analyses Based on Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Hongbin Liu & Hebin Zhang & Yuxuan Xu & Ying Xue, 2024. "Decision-Making Mechanism of Farmers in Land Transfer Processes Based on Sustainable Livelihood Analysis Framework: A Study in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1001-:d:1430177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.