IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p886-d1417690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Policy Frameworks in Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand: Examining the Opportunities and Barriers of Indigenous-Led Conservation and Protected Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Emalee A. Vandermale

    (Faculty of Science, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada)

  • Jordyn Bogetti

    (Faculty of Science, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada)

  • Courtney W. Mason

    (Tourism Management/Natural Resource Science Departments, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada)

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples throughout the world have been displaced from their ancestral territories through colonial land use management. Indigenous Peoples have pushed settler-colonial governments to shift their policy frameworks to better support Indigenous rights and leadership across land management, but particularly in conservation. In Canada, this has recently involved the development of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas. Combined with pressure from international organizations, Canada’s Federal Government has dedicated substantial funds to support the establishment of these areas and to achieve conservation and reconciliatory goals. In Aotearoa New Zealand, Māori groups have shaped new legislation that recognizes legal personality status for natural features, which contrasts with Western understandings of land ownership. Indigenous-led conservation in Canada faces many interrelated barriers grounded in colonial histories that complicate land jurisdictions, reconciliation, and protected area networks. This research reveals some of this complexity by examining how Indigenous-led conservation can contribute to more equitable and consensus-based decision-making frameworks in land use management. Policy and legal analyses of Canadian, Aotearoa New Zealand, and international conservation and human rights documents inform our results. We affirm that Indigenous-led conservation can foster relationships between Indigenous Nations and Crown governments. They can also provide steps towards reconciling colonial injustices, supporting Indigenous self-determination, and advancing more sustainable land use systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Emalee A. Vandermale & Jordyn Bogetti & Courtney W. Mason, 2024. "Land Use Policy Frameworks in Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand: Examining the Opportunities and Barriers of Indigenous-Led Conservation and Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:886-:d:1417690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aikaterini Argyrou & Harry Hummels, 2019. "Legal personality and economic livelihood of the Whanganui River: a call for community entrepreneurship," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6-7), pages 752-768, October.
    2. Mason, Courtney W., 2015. "The Banff Indian Days tourism festivals," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-95.
    3. Graeme Reed & Nicolas D. Brunet & Deborah McGregor & Curtis Scurr & Tonio Sadik & Jamie Lavigne & Sheri Longboat, 2022. "Toward Indigenous visions of nature-based solutions: an exploration into Canadian federal climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 514-533, April.
    4. Shirley Thompson & Stewart Hill & Annette Salles & Tanzim Ahmed & Ajarat Adegun & Uche Nwankwo, 2023. "The Northern Corridor, Food Insecurity and the Resource Curse for Indigenous Communities in Canada," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(20), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Damon Matthews & Kirsten Zickfeld & Alexander Koch & Amy Luers, 2023. "Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Jenanne Ferguson & Evgeniia (Jen) Sidorova, 2023. "The Usage of Indigenous Languages as a Tool for Meaningful Engagement With Northern Indigenous Governments and Communities," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(12), April.
    3. Woratschek, Herbert & Horbel, Chris & Popp, Bastian, 2020. "Conceptualizing Resource Integration: The Peculiar Role of Pure Public Resources," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(2-3), pages 157-169.
    4. Jing Xu & Yongchun Yang & Shihan Cheng & Yanjie Mu, 2022. "The Globalization Path of the Deep Inland Cities Dominated by the International Festivals Based on the Power in Western China: The Comparison between Xining Sports Festival and Yinchuan Cultural Festi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "The impact of national tourism day festivals on inbound tourism: A spatial difference-in-differences approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(2), pages 417-441, March.
    6. Chima Onyeneke & Bruce Harper & Shirley Thompson, 2024. "Mining versus Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas: Traditional Land Uses of the Anisininew in the Red Sucker Lake First Nation, Manitoba, Canada," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Marie Davidová & Kateřina Zímová, 2021. "COLreg: The Tokenised Cross-Species Multicentred Regenerative Region Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Ruizi Yu & Quan Mu, 2023. "Integration of Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Policy and Practice of Nature-Based Solutions in China: Progress and Highlights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Xiaoming (Rose) Liu & Jun (Justin) Li, 2018. "Host Perceptions of Tourism Impact and Stage of Destination Development in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Junyan Meng & Wei Xu, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Carbon Reduction Policy Based on the Background of Global Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:886-:d:1417690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.