IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i5p674-d1393674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Waterfront Regeneration on Ecological and Historical Dimensions: Insight from a Unique Case in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lulu Chen

    (School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
    Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Hong Leng

    (School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
    Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Jian Dai

    (School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
    Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Yi Liu

    (School of Art and Archaeology, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Ziqing Yuan

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

To address current ecological issues and a lack of historical preservation in Beijing’s waterfront, it has become necessary to establish an urban design project that optimizes these aspects. This study focuses on “Beijing’s Waterfront Overall Urban Design,” a project that integrates government requirements with Beijing’s waterfront urban design characteristics and problems to establish an urban layer system from two dimensions: historical and ecological. It explores how the urban layer system can be applied to Beijing’s overall waterfront urban design, from investigation to evaluation, analysis, visualization, and strategy development. First, an urban layer system for Beijing’s waterfront was established from a historical perspective, based on urban setting and construction stages and space utilization, referring to the literature and field surveys. The evolution of urban layers of waterbodies, the water–city relationship, and water functions was systematically analyzed. Second, an urban layer system was established for the ecological dimension of Beijing’s waterfront based on a literature review, expert interviews, and analytic hierarchy process methods. It included four urban layers: waterbody, greening, shoreline, and ecological function. The quality of the ecological urban design of 54 waterfront reaches in Beijing was evaluated using questionnaires and field surveys. Third, a series of urban layer maps was generated using the mapping method. Finally, urban design strategies were developed based on the combined historical and ecological characteristics and problems of Beijing’s waterfront. The results of this study and the concept of an urban layer system for waterfront urban design can benefit waterfront urban design projects and future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lulu Chen & Hong Leng & Jian Dai & Yi Liu & Ziqing Yuan, 2024. "Urban Waterfront Regeneration on Ecological and Historical Dimensions: Insight from a Unique Case in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:674-:d:1393674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahar Attia & Asmaa Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim, 2018. "Accessible and Inclusive Public Space: The Regeneration of Waterfront in Informal Areas," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 314-337, October.
    2. Shima Hamidi & Somayeh Moazzeni, 2019. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lulu Chen & Yi Liu & Hong Leng & Suning Xu & Yichen Wang, 2022. "Current and Expected Value Assessment of the Waterfront Urban Design: A Case Study of the Comprehensive Urban Design of Beijing’s Waterfront," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Singleton, Patrick A. & Park, Keunhyun & Lee, Doo Hong, 2021. "Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Jorge Quijada-Alarcón & Roberto Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Gabriel Bethancourt-Lasso, 2023. "Spatial Analysis of Territorial Connectivity and Accessibility in the Province of Coclé in Panama," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Deborah Paul & Sara Moridpour & Le Andrew Nguyen, 2023. "Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Behaviour of Pedestrians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Haiming Wang, 2023. "Walk Score, Environmental Quality and Walking in a Campus Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Paulo Silva, 2020. "Not So Much about Informality: Emergent Challenges for Urban Planning and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Hessameddin Maniei & Reza Askarizad & Maryam Pourzakarya & Dietwald Gruehn, 2024. "The Influence of Urban Design Performance on Walkability in Cultural Heritage Sites of Isfahan, Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, September.
    10. Shuang Zhang & Jamie Mackee & Michael Sing & Liyaning Maggie Tang, 2022. "Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Affected Local Community Participation Research in Megaproject-Induced Displacement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Yirong Luo & Zhisen Lin, 2023. "Spatial Accessibility Analysis and Optimization Simulation of Urban Riverfront Space Based on Space Syntax and POIs: A Case Study of Songxi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Andreea-Loreta Cercleux, 2021. "Street Art Participation in Increasing Investments in the City Center of Bucharest, a Paradox or Not?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Zhehao Zhang & Haiming Wang & Lei Pang & Thomas Fisher & Shuo Yang, 2023. "Comparisons of Built Environment Correlates of Walking in Urban and Suburban Campuses: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Jishu Huang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Research on Social Service Effectiveness Evaluation for Urban Blue Spaces—A Case Study of the Huangpu River Core Section in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:674-:d:1393674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.